Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

The Panopticon Effect, 99% invisible, 03.28.23 Podcast and transcript

In the Netherlands, about an hour and a half south of Amsterdam, there’s a city called Breda. Like many Dutch towns, it has cozy narrow streets, canals and plenty of bicycles. But there’s one historic building – right in the middle of town that really stands out from the rest.
[…]
Inside the building, there’s a wide-open circular hall the size of half a football field with the sprawling dome overhead. Along the curved brick walls, there are hundreds of heavy orange doors spread out evenly across the four floors. And behind most of these doors are small rooms that were once prison cells. When this place was first built in 1886, it was a penitentiary. But not a typical one. This was a panopticon.
[…]
Over time, the panopticon has turned into something way bigger than just a blueprint for penitentiaries. It’s become the metaphor for the surveillance state. Philosopher Michel Foucault had probably the most popular take on the panopticon concept. He used it to warn society that what actually keeps all of us in check isn’t necessarily that someone is watching you. It’s just the feeling that someone might be watching you. But very few actual prisons were built around this idea.

Bstieler, Michaela and Gianluca Crepaldi. “Working-Through Wellness: Critical Perspectives on the Contemporary Wellness Dispositif.” Genealogy+Critique 9, no. 1 (2023): 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.16995/gc.9543

Abstract
In this paper, we examine the institutionalised demands and imperatives that govern the contemporary working subject. Our starting point is the thesis advanced by both Alain Ehrenberg and Eva Illouz that since the 1960s institutions are no longer characterised by a strict culture of prohibition and discipline. Instead, institutions seem to be increasingly animated by the norms and practices of a “culture of self-care”, enriched by therapeutisation (Ehrenberg) and emotionalisation (Illouz). However, this does not mean that the disciplinary regimes that Foucault focuses on are simply disappearing. They persist, albeit in a different form, and we demonstrate this by looking at three central aspects of contemporary wellness: (a) specific spatial arrangements, (b) the performance of bodily practices and techniques and (c) ritualised interactions. We argue that in wellness facilities disciplinary regimes become effective through interpellations that are inscribed in rigid temporal-spatial orders and demand the body’s docility. Insofar as this process relies on those norms that Ehrenberg and Illouz reserve for post-Fordist labour, the wellness space can ultimately be understood as a labour space. For what is at stake is the productivity of the subject.

Keywords: well-being, subjectivity, neoliberalism, labour, normativity, capitalism, temporality, Alain Ehrenberg, Eva Illouz, Michel Foucault

Ivan Segré, Destitution: Lacan, Foucault et la cabale, Lundi matin, no. 376, 31 mars 2023

Sur la base de certains énoncés de Lacan et de Foucault, qu’il s’efforce d’élucider, Ivan Segré propose une sorte de généalogie de la notion de « critique ». Partant des observations de Foucault relatives à la critique biblique au XVIe siècle, il aboutit, via Lacan, à une réflexion sur la contingence du pouvoir. Le chemin est escarpé, mais le détour vaut le coup d’œil.

Dans l’histoire des sciences humaines, l’interprétation des rêves a d’une certaine manière succédé à celle de la Bible. Or l’herméneutique biblique avait une histoire, depuis les philologues grecs et latins de l’antiquité jusqu’à ce tournant historique que Pierre Gibert a appelé « l’invention critique de la Bible [1] » et qu’il situe entre le XVe et le XVIIIe siècle. C’est à cette « invention » que Michel Foucault se réfère lorsqu’il pose la question « Qu’est-ce que la critique ? » ; et qu’il répond :

« Et si la gouvernementalisation, c’est bien ce mouvement par lequel il s’agissait dans la réalité même d’une pratique sociale d’assujettir les individus par des mécanismes de pouvoir qui se réclament d’une vérité, eh bien, je dirais que la critique, c’est le mouvement par lequel le sujet se donne le droit d’interroger la vérité sur ses effets de pouvoir et le pouvoir sur ses discours de vérité ; la critique, ce sera l’art de l’inservitude volontaire, celui de l’indocilité réfléchie. La critique aurait essentiellement pour fonction le désassujettissement dans le jeu de ce qu’on pourrait appeler, d’un mot, la politique de la vérité. »[2]

[1] L’Invention critique de la Bible. XVe-XVIIIe siècle…
[2] Qu’est-ce que la critique, Vrin, 2015..

Lire la suite

»

Hodges BD, Martimianakis MA, McNaughton N, Whitehead C. Medical education… meet Michel Foucault. Medical Education. 2014 Jun;48(6):563-71.
doi: 10.1111/medu.12411. PMID: 24807433.
Abstract

Context: There have been repeated calls for the greater use of conceptual frameworks and of theory in medical education. Although it is familiar to few medical educators, Michel Foucault’s work is a helpful theoretical and methodological source.

Methods: This article explores what it means to use a ‘Foucauldian approach’, presents a sample of Foucault’s historical-genealogical studies that are relevant to medical education, and introduces the work of four researchers currently undertaking Foucauldian-inspired medical education research.

Results: Although they are not without controversy, Foucauldian approaches are employed by an increasing number of scholars and are helpful in shedding light on what it is possible to think, say and be in medical education.

Conclusions: Our hope in sharing this Foucauldian work and perspective is that we might stimulate a dialogue that is forward-looking and optimistic about the possibilities for change in medical education.

Faubion, James. “Michel Foucault”. Encyclopedia Britannica, 6 Jan. 2023, https://www.britannica.com/biography/Michel-Foucault.

Education and career
The son and grandson of a physician, Michel Foucault was born to a solidly bourgeois family. He resisted what he regarded as the provincialism of his upbringing and his native country, and his career was marked by frequent sojourns abroad. A distinguished but sometimes erratic student, Foucault gained entry at the age of 20 to the École Normale Supérieure (ENS) in Paris in 1946. There he studied psychology and philosophy, embraced and then abandoned communism, and established a reputation as a sedulous, brilliant, and eccentric student.

After graduating in 1952, Foucault began a career marked by constant movement, both professional and intellectual. He first taught at the University of Lille, then spent five years (1955–60) as a cultural attaché in Uppsala, Sweden; Warsaw, Poland; and Hamburg, West Germany (now Germany). Foucault defended his doctoral dissertation at the ENS in 1961. Circulated under the title Folie et déraison: histoire de la folie à l’âge classique (“Madness and Unreason: A History of Madness in the Classical Age”), it won critical praise but a limited audience. (An abridged version was translated into English and published in 1965 as Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason.) His other early monographs, written while he taught at the University of Clermont-Ferrand in France (1960–66), had much the same fate. Not until the appearance of Les Mots et les choses (“Words and Things”; Eng. trans. The Order of Things) in 1966 did Foucault begin to attract wide notice as one of the most original and controversial thinkers of his day. He chose to watch his reputation grow from a distance—at the University of Tunis in Tunisia (1966–68)—and was still in Tunis when student riots erupted in Paris in the spring of 1968. In 1969 he published L’Archéologie du savoir (The Archaeology of Knowledge). In 1970, after a brief tenure as director of the philosophy department at the University of Paris, Vincennes, he was awarded a chair in the history of systems of thought at the Collège de France, France’s most prestigious postsecondary institution. The appointment gave Foucault the opportunity to conduct intensive research.
[…]

David McGrogan, A Foucauldian Defense of Liberalism, Law & Liberty, March 27 2023

We should not settle for the nominal freedom of a relentlessly micromanaged society.

There is a strong case to be made that Michel Foucault was the most important and influential thinker of the second half of the twentieth century. He was not a nice man. And many of his conclusions were odious. But he discerned the path on which modernity was walking better than almost anybody else.

The most useful of Foucault’s contributions were not published in book form but were delivered as lectures, posthumously compiled and translated. Those gathered in the collection Security, Territory, Population are far and away the most significant. In them, Foucault provides a complete conceptualisation of the evolution of modern governance, showing how it is characterised, above all, by “governmentality” or what has elsewhere been called the “conducting of conduct.”

[…]

David McGrogan is Associate Professor of Law at Northumbria University. He blogs at News From Uncibal.

Daniele Lorenzini, Philosophy Colloquium: Genealogy as a Practice of Truth: Nietzsche, Foucault, Fanon

Presented by the Philosophy Department at The New School for Social Research.
Thursday, April 20, 2023, 6:00PM to 8:00PM (EDT)
6 E 16th St Wolff Conference Room/D1103
The New School
66 West 12th Street
New York, NY 10011

This paper has two main, interconnected goals. On the one hand, the argument is that, even though the major forms taken by genealogy throughout the history of philosophy seem to make it impervious to truth, there is an important sense in which genealogy, specifically as conceived of and practiced by Nietzsche and Foucault, is a practice of truth. How to make sense of this claim? The first two sections of the paper address this question and show that the (Nietzschean and Foucauldian) genealogist aims to produce “new truths” that function as disruptive ethico-political forces destabilizing current modes of thinking and being, and creating the concrete possibility for the emergence of new possibilities for thought and action. The third and final section of the paper, on the other hand, builds on these insights to argue that Fanon’s psychiatric writings, too, can be construed as genealogical practices of truth. By doing so, the presenter will not only muster further evidence for the conclusions in section II, but also provide an alternate framework to make sense of Fanon’s contribution to critical theory broadly construed—one that doesn’t reduce him neither to the tradition of historical materialism nor to critical phenomenology or phenomenological psychiatry alone.

Schmidgen, Henning, et al. “From the Archive to the Computer: Michel Foucault and the Digital Humanities.” Journal of Cultural Analytics, vol. 7, no. 4, Mar. 2023, doi:10.22148/001c.55795.

Abstract
Michel Foucault famously introduced the method of “discourse analysis” in the humanities, especially in historiography. In his Archaeology of Knowledge, originally published in 1969, in particular, Foucault argues for making the history of knowledge the object of discourse analyses. In the context of the current surge of interest in discourse analysis in the field of computer science, however, there are hardly any references to Foucault, partly because he never defined a methodological process that could be operationalized. Nonetheless we argue for re-reading The Archaeology of Knowledge in the context of computer science and the digital humanities. As a matter of fact, there are considerable affinities between Foucault’s search for the regularities of discourse and current projects dealing with the digitization of texts, their indexing, distributional features, stylometry, etc. We show that these projects were already quite prominent in Foucault’s day, to the point that historian Emmanuel Le Roy Ladurie could assert, in 1968, that “the future historian will be a programmer.” A year later, Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge actively responded and constructively took up the challenge – which, given the recent advances in machine learning and computational linguistics, strikes us as a crucial move today.

bertJean-François Bert, Jérôme Lamy (dir.), Michel Foucault : un héritage critique, Paris, CNRS Éditions, 2014, 416 p., ISBN : 9782271081469.

Updated 2023. Now available in Open Edition Books
BERT, Jean-François (dir.) ; LAMY, Jérôme (dir.). Michel Foucault, un héritage critique. Nouvelle édition [en ligne]. Paris : CNRS Éditions, 2014 ( Disponible sur Internet : http://books.openedition.org/editionscnrs/50867. ISBN : 9782271142306. DOI : https://doi.org/10.4000/books.editionscnrs.50867.

Infos

Présentation de l’éditeur

Les écrits de Michel Foucault sont stratifiés, hiérarchisés, entre les livres, les entretiens et les cours au Collège de France, mais ils sont surtout disséminés dans leurs usages. Désormais, et en plus de l’histoire des sciences et de la philosophie, les « effets » Foucault sont palpables sur la théorie de la littérature et du cinéma, l’histoire culturelle et sociale, les théories du genre, la pensée politique, les sciences de gestion…

C’est dans ce chantier ouvert que se situe cet ouvrage. Il s’agit pour Jérôme Lamy, Jean-François Bert et leur équipe de spécialistes de resituer et d’analyser une pensée empruntant des questionnements à d’autres champs, de la psychologie à l’économie, de la science politique à la géographie, tout en ne se réclamant pas de ces sciences humaines et sociales. Pour comprendre la position de Foucault, les grands axes méthodologiques qu’il a parcourus sont retracés, telle l’archéologie, l’épistémè, la problématisation. Les concepts, des ouvrages maintenant classiques aux cours et à l’histoire de la sexualité, sont également revisités. Cette lecture critique des écrits et des usages de Foucault permet de le confronter aux analyses les plus récentes en sciences sociales, comme les postcolonial studies, ou de suivre les dialogues engagés (parfois à distance) avec des auteurs comme Norbert Elias, Michel de Certeau et Pierre Bourdieu.

Un inventaire aussi rigoureux qu’éclairant.

Directeurs

Jean-François Bert est maître d’enseignement et de recherche à l’université de Lausanne, IRCM.

Jérôme Lamy est chercheur à l’université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines.

Compte rendu de Alexandre Klein

Trente ans après sa mort, l’ombre imposante du philosophe Michel Foucault (1926-1984) plane encore sur de nombreuses recherches, particulièrement dans le domaine des sciences humaines et sociales (SHS). Pour certains, il y serait même devenu omniprésent1. En effet, des travaux politiques ou juridiques aux recherches sur le genre ou la prison, en passant les études postcoloniales, l’anthropologie, l’ethnologie, la sociologie, l’architecture, l’histoire, les cultural studies, la philosophie ou les STS, celui qui appela à user de son œuvre comme d’une boîte à outils fait aujourd’hui l’objet d’usages multiples, se voyant même parfois usé jusqu’à la corde. Si nul ne doute du succès certain de la pensée de Foucault, reprise et citée abondamment, tant pour être critiquée, encensée, que justement commentée, rares sont ceux qui peuvent prétendre à une vue globale des emprunts, déplacements, transferts, usages, utilisations ou hommages auxquels ses travaux et réflexions sont soumis. Il convenait donc, au-delà de la présentation des possibles usages contemporains de la pensée et des concepts foucaldiens, de se situer par rapport à ce corpus devenu aujourd’hui un pôle méthodologique incontournable, notamment pour les SHS morcelées de la fin du XXe siècle et du début du XXIe siècle.

suite

Juignet, Patrick. Michel Foucault et le concept d’épistémè. Philosophie, science et société. 2015. https://philosciences.com/10

L’œuvre de Michel Foucault est discontinue. Nous nous intéresserons ici à la période que l’on peut approximativement situer entre 1965 et 1977, période pendant laquelle il a développé et utilisé le concept d’épistémè. Ce concept a eu une carrière limitée ; apparu dans Les Mots et les Choses en 1966, il a été délaissé au bout de douze ans, car Michel Foucault a considéré que son utilisation aboutissait à une impasse.

Plan de l’article :

1. Une définition de départ pour le concept d’épistémè
2. Le concept d’épistémè combine plusieurs aspects
3. Les trois épistémès en Occident
4. Le point de vue “archéologique” change la définition
5. L’épistémè n’est ni l’esprit d’une époque, ni un moment de civilisation
6. Critiques des résultats de Michel Foucault
7. Un emploi précis du concept d’épistémè est-il possible ?