Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

The Foucault Century

The Foucault Century

2026 marks the centennial of Michel Foucault’s birth and the 50-year anniversary of the publication of his landmark History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. This two-day symposium offers a renewed assessment of Foucault’s thought.

Dates: September 24 – 25, 2026
Location: Class of 1978 Orrery Pavilion, 6th Floor, Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
Open to the Public

Hosted by: Kislak Center

“What, do you imagine that I would take so much trouble and so much pleasure in writing, do you think that I would keep so persistently to my task, if I were not preparing—with a rather shaky hand—a labyrinth into which I can venture, in which I can move my discourse, opening up underground passages, forcing it to go far from itself, finding overhangs that reduce and deform its itinerary, in which I can lose myself and appear at last to eyes that I will never have to meet again? I am no doubt not the only one who writes in order to have no face.”

Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge

Michel Foucault’s influence on contemporary thought is unmatched by any other twentieth-century intellectual. Reputed to be the most widely cited scholar in history, his work has provided a foundational vocabulary in a variety of disciplines across the humanities and social sciences. He remains one of the most widely taught figures in institutions of higher education worldwide. Even where Foucault’s name is no longer invoked, the shaping influence of his corpus has been transformative—even revolutionary.

2026 marks the centennial of Foucault’s birth and the 50-year anniversary of the publication of his landmark History of Sexuality, Vol. 1The Foucault Century, a symposium at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (September 24–25, 2026), offers a renewed assessment of Foucault’s thought.

Forty years after his death, our understanding of Foucault’s scholarship has been enriched and transformed by a wealth of groundbreaking posthumous publications. These include Foucault’s thirteen courses at the Collège de France, lectures and seminars at other institutions around the world from the 1960s to the 1980s, and the fourth volume of History of Sexuality—Confessions of the Flesh. More material is coming out all the time, with Foucault’s 1966–1967 public lectures at the University of Tunis now in press.

The Foucault Century considers the manifold implications of this expanding corpus. And it takes as its premise that the Foucault we already know—or think we know—may need to be reconsidered. What has sometimes been called the “textbook image of Foucault” has become an obstacle to fully grasping the depth, complexity, and tensions of his thought.

The Foucault Century will bring together an international group of Foucault specialists to consider a range of problems in the contemporary assessment of Foucault: What questions are being left unasked in the default interpretation of Foucault that has been passed down? What controversies remain unresolved? Which of Foucault’s many voices and guises can be brought into productive conversation with our contemporary intellectual, political, and cultural controversies? And which need to be criticized or dismantled? Which Foucaults have been remembered? And which have been forgotten and may need to be brought to light again?

Sponsors

Centre Michel Foucault
Greater Philadelphia Philosophy Consortium 

University of Pennsylvania:

Registration

Register for each day separately.

Register: Sept 24

Register: Sept 25

Schedule

September 24

2:30–3:00 – Welcome

3:00–4:15 – Public lecture, “Chez Foucault: Rethinking Foucault through the Archives” (Niki Kasumi Clements)

4:15–4:30 – Break

4:30–6:00 – Session 1 (Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson, Daniele Lorenzini)

6:00–7:00 – Catered dinner

7:00–9:00 – Film screening + discussion

Foucault Against Himself

Foucault: Historian of Truth

September 25

10:00–12:00 – Session 2 (Sabeen Ahmed, Amy Allen, Penelope Deutscher)

12:00–1:15 – Catered Lunch and Viewing of Exhibit

1:15–2:45 – Session 3 (Amy Hollywood, Donovan Schaefer)

2:45–3:00 – Break

3:00–4:30 – Session 4 (David Halperin, Lynne Huffer)

4:30–4:45 – Break

4:45–5:30 – Wrap-up discussion

Speakers

Sabeen Ahmed
Amy Allen
Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson
Niki Kasumi Clements
Penelope Deutscher
David Halperin
Amy Hollywood
Lynne Huffer
Daniele Lorenzini
Donovan Schaefer

Sam Binkley , Biopolitical Metaphor: Habitualized Embodiment between Discourse and Affect, Body & Society, 24(3), 2018, pp. 95-124.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X1876739

Abstract
This article theorizes the biopolitical production of embodiment through a consideration of biopolitical metaphor. It is argued that much recent theoretical work on biopower fails to provide an adequate account of embodiment, and particularly the question of the habitualization of bodily experience. However, read through the lens of biopolitical metaphor, and drawing on the works of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, a dynamic account of the biopolitical shaping of bodily memory and embodied habit becomes possible. Moreover, it is argued that a theory of biopolitical metaphor provides provocative openings for thinking together the recent discursively oriented work on biopower and other approaches associated with the affective turn, specifically around the problems of mimesis and supplement. New research directions are proposed, centered on common experiences of biopolitical domination among marginalized groups drawn from shared experiences of habit and embodiment.

Maurizio Meloni, Coloniality and Structural Othering in European Thought A Racialized Canon, Routledge 2026

This book provides a historical and conceptual analysis of patterns of racialized otherness in European thought, traversing primary sources, historical periods, and national archives, to show that the longue durée of structural othering beyond individual disciplinary canons is essential to making sense of epistemic violence and structural coloniality in the European canon.

Through the analysis of published texts and personal letters, the book brings to light racializing tropes and patterns of othering in four canonical authors each representing a different Western European country: Italian father of humanism Francesco Petrarca (Petrarch), Charles Darwin, Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault. The chapters on Italian humanism begin by highlighting how one of the founding myths of European modernity was shaped by a protocolonial mentality and the violent excision of Arabic sources, whilst the chapter on Darwin analyses the importance of shooting and frontier wars in the Beagle voyage and the vicissitudes of the term ‘extermination’ in Darwin’s thought. Elias’s civilizing narrative is unpacked to highlight his omission of colonial violence in parallel to the development of court etiquette in the metropoles. Finally, Foucault’s belief in the uniqueness of the Greek experience goes in parallel with his deletion of Islamic presence in the genealogy of modern governmentality. The initial and final chapters offer an ethnography of forgotten ethnic violence and racialized monuments in Italy linked with the distinctive history of Italian colonialism and ‘eternal fascism’.

It will appeal to scholars, researchers and students with interests in social theory, sociology, political theory, cultural studies, history, history of science, and postcolonial and ethnic studies.

Maurizio Meloni is Associate Professor of Sociology at the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at Deakin University, Australia. He works at the interface of social theory and the history of biology, racism, and the body. His authored books include: Political Biology (2016), and Impressionable Biologies (Routledge, 2019).

Stephen J. Ball, Education Policy and Social Class The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball, Routledge, 2026

Bringing together twenty years of research and writing, this book provides an overview of Stephen Ball’s career and shows not only the development of his most important ideas but also the long-lasting contributions he has made to the field of educational policy analysis. This volume contains sixteen key essays divided into three sections:

  • perspectives on policy research
  • policy technologies and policy analysis
  • social class and education policy

Each chapter presents innovative ways of thinking about public policy, asking probing questions about what policy is, how policy is influenced and what effects intentional and unintentional policies have. As a body of work, this collection raises issues of ethics and social justice which are often neglected in the mass of policies that now affect every aspect of our education systems.

Kampanart “Menn” Chaiyarat (2026). Democratic citizenship education under constraint: a critical phenomenological study of teacher agency and everyday resistance. Oxford Review of Education, 1–18. Published online: 27 Jul 2026
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2026.2702439

ABSTRACT
In contexts where democracy is politically constrained, how do teachers continue to teach democratic values without placing themselves or their students at risk? Drawing on a critical phenomenological study of two secondary social studies teachers in Thailand, this article examines how democracy is lived and interpreted in everyday teaching practice. Based on classroom observations, interviews, school shadowing, and analysis of teaching artefacts, the study shows that teachers approach democracy less as a stable political regime or the transmission of civic knowledge and more as a relational and temporally deferred practice. In doing so, they engage in navigational compliance and collective counter-conduct, alongside pedagogical subversion and constructive transformation, to manage institutional risk. Rather than framing these practices as democratic transformation, this article conceptualises them as democratic maintenance, understood as the ongoing work of keeping democratic imagination, participation, and ethical relations alive under constraint. The study contributes to scholarship on teacher agency, everyday resistance, and civic education by theorising democracy as a fragile practice sustained through teachers’ everyday labour.

KEYWORDS:
Democracy, everyday resistance, teacher agency, social studies education, critical phenomenology, Thailand

Sam Binkley, (2026). The double life of the dangerous object: phobogenecity from doctrinal to relational racism. Culture, Theory and Critique, 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14735784.2026.2683961

ABSTRACT
Foucault’s genealogy of race traces the racial to the normalising functions of the biopolitical state. Thus conceived, racism is deeply invested in the doctrinal practices of racial government, while little attention is paid to racism as a relational, interpersonal phenomenon. This essay considers Foucault’s inattention to the relational character of racism by considering the contradiction between doctrinal and relational racisms. A theory of what I term racial grafting describes the overlay of doctrinal racism across the relational forms of ordinary, everyday racial resentment. Moreover, through a consideration of Frantz Fanon’s phobogenic object and Foucault’s race war, it is proposed that grafting occurs around the phobic production of dangerous objects. Dangerousness, which serves as both an ontological condition and a propensity for possible actions, describes a deeply ambivalent object that straddles racial being and racial doing, and as such serves as a pivotal point around which doctrinal and relation grafting occurs. This analysis concludes with a discussion of Foucault’s treatment of the Social Defense criminological movement (for which the course Society Must Be Defended was named) wherein criminological dangerousness provides the framework for contemporary racism. Such a discussion demonstrates Foucault’s relevance to contemporary critiques of racial civility in public life.

KEYWORDS:
Racism Foucault Fanon phobogenesis, grafting, doctrinal racism, relational racism, social defense, criminology

Emily Eakin, The Frenchmen. Or, My Life in Theory, Penguin Random House, 2026
Review by Dayna Tortorici, New York Times, 23 July 2026

Description
When Emily Eakin arrived at Harvard in the late 1980s, she fell under the spell of an eclectic body of philosophical texts by a handful of French authors. This was French theory, a set of recondite ideas that had taken American campuses by a storm during the preceding decades. In retrospect, the influence of these men and their writings seems both extraordinary and improbable. The Frenchmen argued that language is all-powerful, meaning unstable, and the self is an illusion. Their prose was brilliant, dazzling even, but often mystifyingly elaborate and highly abstract. Yet American students and scholars flocked to their books and lectures, intoxicated by a powerful new means of understanding—and perhaps even changing—the world. For Eakin, an unsophisticated graduate of a small-town Midwestern high school, theory was no mere intellectual exercise but a way of being—a heady shortcut to worldly glamour and wisdom.

The Frenchmen
is the story of Eakin’s youthful love affair with French theory, alongside a wider examination of its rise and fall. Looking closely at Jacques Derrida, Louis Althusser, Roland Barthes, Gilles Deleuze, Michel Foucault, Félix Guattari, Jacques Lacan, and the French-speaking Belgian Paul de Man, Eakin untangles their famously difficult works with peerless, delightful clarity. What’s more, she brings to light the eccentric, scandalous—at times criminal!—lives of thinkers who themselves were often highly averse to biography, in a daringly original weave of storytelling and exegesis.

As she explores the magnetism of their work, Eakin illuminates not just the Frenchmen’s enduring legacy but some of today’s deepest political, social, and intellectual arguments. She neither rejects nor flatters the Frenchmen’s ideas but instead reveals how they indelibly changed our understanding of power, truth, and identity. Eakin shows how, for better or worse, the Frenchmen continue to shape and unsettle our lives today.

Emily Eakin is a senior editor at The New York Times Book Review. The Frenchmen is her first book.

Michael C. Behrent, Becoming Foucault. The Poitiers Years, University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023

Though Michel Foucault is one of the most important thinkers of the twentieth century, little is known about his early life. Even Foucault’s biographers have neglected this period, preferring instead to start the story when the future philosopher arrives in Paris.

Becoming Foucault is a historical reconstruction of the world in which Foucault grew up: the small city of Poitiers, France, from the 1920s until the end of the Second World War. Beyond exploring previously unexamined aspects of Foucault’s childhood, including his wartime ordeals, it proposes an original interpretation of Foucault’s oeuvre. Michael Behrent argues that Foucault, in addition to being a theorist of power, knowledge, and selfhood, was also a philosopher of experience. He was a thinker intent on making sense of the events that he lived through. Behrent identifies four specific experiences in Foucault’s childhood that exercised a decisive influence on him and that, in various ways, he later made the subject of his philosophy: his family’s deep connections to the medical profession; his upbringing in a bourgeois household; the German Occupation during World War II; and his Catholic education.

Behrent not only reconstructs the specific nature of these experiences but also shows how reference to them surfaces in Foucault’s later work. In this way, the book both sheds light on a formative period in the philosopher’s life and offers a unique interpretation of key aspects of his thought.

Michael C. Behrent is Professor of History at Appalachian State University.

Patrick Weil et Jeanne Favret-Saada, Continuer Foucault ? , Le Grand Continent, 27 mai 2026
L’historien Patrick Weil s’entretient avec l’anthropologue qui, cinquante ans plus tard, rouvre le cas Rivière.

Jeanne Favret-Saada vient de publier un livre événement pour les sciences sociales. Cinquante-trois ans après que Michel Foucault eut dirigé la publication en 1973, dans le cadre d’un séminaire fermé du Collège de France, d’un dossier « Moi Pierre Rivière, ayant égorgé ma mère, ma sœur et mon frère… » auquel elle avait participé, elle rouvre ce cas de parricide au XIXe siècle.

Avec un esprit vif et acéré et une liberté de ton revigorante, elle se plonge dans le dossier Rivière en revenant sur les nombreux écrits qu’il a suscités parmi les historiens, criminologues, psychiatres et psychanalystes. Avec la même liberté, elle réfléchit aussi sur son propre travail et celui de ses collègues qui co-éditeurs Moi Pierre Rivière… avec Foucault.

Elle aborde sous un angle inédit, l’archive qui fait le caractère exceptionnel de ce dossier : le témoignage du meurtre de sa mère — quarante-neuf grands feuillets écrits de sa prison à l’intention de ses juges, pour expliquer son crime et son désir de sauver son père du martyre auquel sa mère le soumettait depuis leur mariage.

suite