Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Jessamine Giese, Marie White and Megan Gibson. 2026. “Leading from Outside the ‘Hierarchical Box’: Enacting the Educational Leader Role in Early Childhood Teams” Education Sciences 16, no. 8: 1306.
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci16081306

Abstract
Early childhood education and care (ECEC) is significantly shaped by policy and an enduring focus on quality. While policy governs service provision, it is teams of educators who transform policy into practice, defining and enacting understandings of policy and quality through shared decision-making. In Australia, central to the ECEC quality agenda is the educational leader, a role positioned to guide teams of educators in decision-making. This paper examines how the educational leader role is interpreted in centre documents by services and then enacted in practice by individuals, drawing on Foucauldian-informed discourse analysis of a textual archive comprising policy documents, centre documentation, and focus group data from four Queensland long day care centres. Findings indicate a disconnect between policy intentions of the educational leader and centre-level enactment, where the role is both enabled and constrained in various ways. The educational leader is identified as enacted through five discursive practices: the educational leader as an ‘add-on’ role, no degree required, outside the ‘hierarchical box’, compliance officer, and guide and mentor. By making visible the ways centres interpret and individuals enact the role, this study presents pathways forward to revisit policy and reconsider the positioning of the educational leader in centre staffing structures.

Keywords:
early childhood education and care; educational leader; discourse analysis; discursive practices; decision-making; quality; leadership and teamwork; roles and responsibilities

Julie Assouly & Esther Heboyan (eds.) “Elsewhere” in American Cinema. How Hollywood Represents the World, Bloomsbury, 2026

Description
The foreign ‘elsewhere’ has long been depicted in American cinema as a site of fascination and fantasy, shaping how Western audiences view the world. ‘Elsewhere’ in American Cinema explores how these portrayals have also created enduring stereotypes and reinforced troubling power dynamics, models and counter-models.

Bringing together a diverse group of international contributors, the volume explores depictions of the ‘elsewhere’ across various genres including musicals, westerns, war films, and romantic comedies. Drawing on theoretical frameworks such as Michel Foucault’s heterotopias, Edward Said’s Orientalism, and Homi Bhabha’s concept of in-betweenness, the eleven chapters offer fresh perspectives on films spanning from the silent era to contemporary Hollywood. Through close readings of films such as The Fugitive (1947), America America (1963), and Kingdom of Heaven (2005), they analyse Hollywood’s emphasis on patriotism and its problematic portrayal of conflict zones, the role of music in exoticising foreign lands, and the evolution of stereotypes into counter-models.

As a result, the cinematic ‘elsewhere’ emerges as a complex space that is simultaneously real and constructed, familiar and alien, onto which American filmmakers project cultural anxieties, fantasies, and ideologies, revealing the changing relationship between the United States and the rest of the world.

Rex Butler, Spiritual Exercises in Kantian Philosophy: An Interview with Ian Hunter, Journal of the History of Ideas blog, 17 August 2026

Ian Hunter is an emeritus professor in the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences at the University of Queensland, Australia. He is an intellectual historian who has published various studies in the history of philosophical, political, legal, and theological thought. These studies treat thought as a concrete activity that is carried out within historical time through “arts and methods” and anchored in various “intellectual personae.” His first major work of this kind was Rival Enlightenments, published by Cambridge University Press in 2001. His most recent work and the topic of the present discussion is The Kantian Religion, an historical account of Kantianism as a philosophical religion published by Princeton University Press in 2026. For the JHI Blog, he discussed his latest work with Rex Butler, a Professor of Art History in the Faculty of Art Design and Architecture at Monash University who writes on critical theory and Australian art.

[…]
Ian Hunter: I had already drawn on Foucault’s discussion of spirituality and its relation to philosophy in earlier works. Foucault treats spirituality as the carrying out of certain “acts of the self on the self” that are designed to shape a subject capable of higher forms of insight, including philosophical insight. This was an approach that he shared with his one-time Berkeley colleague, the historian of late antiquity Peter Brown, from whose studies of philosophical asceticism I have also learned so much. Fraenkel’s and Hadot’s work has been less important for my investigations, since the former thinks that Neoplatonic philosophy functions as a true religion, while the latter argues that ancient philosophy’s role as a way of life was transferred to Christianity, leaving modern philosophy to emerge as an abstract method. In characterizing Kantianism as a philosophical religion, my aim is more straightforwardly historical: to delineate a series of features that permit the empirical question of its religious disposition to be posed.

[…]

Ian Hunter, The Kantian Religion, Princeton University Press, 2026.
A historical inquiry into Kantian philosophy as a form of philosophical religion

Kantian philosophy is typically viewed as providing a universal theory of knowledge and morality based on timeless principles retrieved from the human mind. In The Kantian Religion, Ian Hunter offers a starkly different account. Hunter contends that Kant’s arguments were assembled from purely historical sources and served as ascetic devices for crafting the towering self of the Kantian philosopher; they were exercises in intellectual self-clarification and moral transformation undertaken by a cohort of the philosophically educated in search of spiritual clarity and moral purity. These “solemn rites of the mind” were seen as heir and rival to the regenerative resources and cultural importance of the Christian religion, and Kantianism was characterized as a philosophical religion.

Hunter describes the ways that elite spiritual athletes performed a series of philosophically strenuous “acts of the self on the self” through Kant’s intellectual exercises. When Kantianism emerged as an insurgent cultural movement in the 1780s, it offered young academics training to be clergy and teachers a philosophy that was powerful enough to supplant Christian spirituality and to subordinate humanist scholarship and the natural sciences to philosophical self-reflection. For Kant and his followers, the religious disposition of Kantian philosophy came solely from the immanent practice of the philosophy itself. As a rival to conventional religion and as an academic interloper, Kantian philosophy unleashed a wave of conflicts in Germany’s ecclesiastical and scholarly cultures. Although recent Kant commentary typically views Kantianism as intrinsically secular and scientific, Hunter argues provocatively that Kant’s contemporaries viewed his philosophy as an extra-ecclesiastical path to spiritual refinement and moral regeneration.

The Foucault Century

The Foucault Century

2026 marks the centennial of Michel Foucault’s birth and the 50-year anniversary of the publication of his landmark History of Sexuality, Vol. 1. This two-day symposium offers a renewed assessment of Foucault’s thought.

Dates: September 24 – 25, 2026
Location: Class of 1978 Orrery Pavilion, 6th Floor, Van Pelt-Dietrich Library Center
Open to the Public

Hosted by: Kislak Center

“What, do you imagine that I would take so much trouble and so much pleasure in writing, do you think that I would keep so persistently to my task, if I were not preparing—with a rather shaky hand—a labyrinth into which I can venture, in which I can move my discourse, opening up underground passages, forcing it to go far from itself, finding overhangs that reduce and deform its itinerary, in which I can lose myself and appear at last to eyes that I will never have to meet again? I am no doubt not the only one who writes in order to have no face.”

Michel Foucault, The Archaeology of Knowledge

Michel Foucault’s influence on contemporary thought is unmatched by any other twentieth-century intellectual. Reputed to be the most widely cited scholar in history, his work has provided a foundational vocabulary in a variety of disciplines across the humanities and social sciences. He remains one of the most widely taught figures in institutions of higher education worldwide. Even where Foucault’s name is no longer invoked, the shaping influence of his corpus has been transformative—even revolutionary.

2026 marks the centennial of Foucault’s birth and the 50-year anniversary of the publication of his landmark History of Sexuality, Vol. 1The Foucault Century, a symposium at the University of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia (September 24–25, 2026), offers a renewed assessment of Foucault’s thought.

Forty years after his death, our understanding of Foucault’s scholarship has been enriched and transformed by a wealth of groundbreaking posthumous publications. These include Foucault’s thirteen courses at the Collège de France, lectures and seminars at other institutions around the world from the 1960s to the 1980s, and the fourth volume of History of Sexuality—Confessions of the Flesh. More material is coming out all the time, with Foucault’s 1966–1967 public lectures at the University of Tunis now in press.

The Foucault Century considers the manifold implications of this expanding corpus. And it takes as its premise that the Foucault we already know—or think we know—may need to be reconsidered. What has sometimes been called the “textbook image of Foucault” has become an obstacle to fully grasping the depth, complexity, and tensions of his thought.

The Foucault Century will bring together an international group of Foucault specialists to consider a range of problems in the contemporary assessment of Foucault: What questions are being left unasked in the default interpretation of Foucault that has been passed down? What controversies remain unresolved? Which of Foucault’s many voices and guises can be brought into productive conversation with our contemporary intellectual, political, and cultural controversies? And which need to be criticized or dismantled? Which Foucaults have been remembered? And which have been forgotten and may need to be brought to light again?

Sponsors

Centre Michel Foucault
Greater Philadelphia Philosophy Consortium 

University of Pennsylvania:

Registration

Register for each day separately.

Register: Sept 24

Register: Sept 25

Schedule

September 24

2:30–3:00 – Welcome

3:00–4:15 – Public lecture, “Chez Foucault: Rethinking Foucault through the Archives” (Niki Kasumi Clements)

4:15–4:30 – Break

4:30–6:00 – Session 1 (Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson, Daniele Lorenzini)

6:00–7:00 – Catered dinner

7:00–9:00 – Film screening + discussion

Foucault Against Himself

Foucault: Historian of Truth

September 25

10:00–12:00 – Session 2 (Sabeen Ahmed, Amy Allen, Penelope Deutscher)

12:00–1:15 – Catered Lunch and Viewing of Exhibit

1:15–2:45 – Session 3 (Amy Hollywood, Donovan Schaefer)

2:45–3:00 – Break

3:00–4:30 – Session 4 (David Halperin, Lynne Huffer)

4:30–4:45 – Break

4:45–5:30 – Wrap-up discussion

Speakers

Sabeen Ahmed
Amy Allen
Verena Erlenbusch-Anderson
Niki Kasumi Clements
Penelope Deutscher
David Halperin
Amy Hollywood
Lynne Huffer
Daniele Lorenzini
Donovan Schaefer

Sam Binkley , Biopolitical Metaphor: Habitualized Embodiment between Discourse and Affect, Body & Society, 24(3), 2018, pp. 95-124.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1357034X1876739

Abstract
This article theorizes the biopolitical production of embodiment through a consideration of biopolitical metaphor. It is argued that much recent theoretical work on biopower fails to provide an adequate account of embodiment, and particularly the question of the habitualization of bodily experience. However, read through the lens of biopolitical metaphor, and drawing on the works of George Lakoff and Mark Johnson, a dynamic account of the biopolitical shaping of bodily memory and embodied habit becomes possible. Moreover, it is argued that a theory of biopolitical metaphor provides provocative openings for thinking together the recent discursively oriented work on biopower and other approaches associated with the affective turn, specifically around the problems of mimesis and supplement. New research directions are proposed, centered on common experiences of biopolitical domination among marginalized groups drawn from shared experiences of habit and embodiment.

Maurizio Meloni, Coloniality and Structural Othering in European Thought A Racialized Canon, Routledge 2026

This book provides a historical and conceptual analysis of patterns of racialized otherness in European thought, traversing primary sources, historical periods, and national archives, to show that the longue durée of structural othering beyond individual disciplinary canons is essential to making sense of epistemic violence and structural coloniality in the European canon.

Through the analysis of published texts and personal letters, the book brings to light racializing tropes and patterns of othering in four canonical authors each representing a different Western European country: Italian father of humanism Francesco Petrarca (Petrarch), Charles Darwin, Norbert Elias and Michel Foucault. The chapters on Italian humanism begin by highlighting how one of the founding myths of European modernity was shaped by a protocolonial mentality and the violent excision of Arabic sources, whilst the chapter on Darwin analyses the importance of shooting and frontier wars in the Beagle voyage and the vicissitudes of the term ‘extermination’ in Darwin’s thought. Elias’s civilizing narrative is unpacked to highlight his omission of colonial violence in parallel to the development of court etiquette in the metropoles. Finally, Foucault’s belief in the uniqueness of the Greek experience goes in parallel with his deletion of Islamic presence in the genealogy of modern governmentality. The initial and final chapters offer an ethnography of forgotten ethnic violence and racialized monuments in Italy linked with the distinctive history of Italian colonialism and ‘eternal fascism’.

It will appeal to scholars, researchers and students with interests in social theory, sociology, political theory, cultural studies, history, history of science, and postcolonial and ethnic studies.

Maurizio Meloni is Associate Professor of Sociology at the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at Deakin University, Australia. He works at the interface of social theory and the history of biology, racism, and the body. His authored books include: Political Biology (2016), and Impressionable Biologies (Routledge, 2019).

Stephen J. Ball, Education Policy and Social Class The Selected Works of Stephen J. Ball, Routledge, 2026

Bringing together twenty years of research and writing, this book provides an overview of Stephen Ball’s career and shows not only the development of his most important ideas but also the long-lasting contributions he has made to the field of educational policy analysis. This volume contains sixteen key essays divided into three sections:

  • perspectives on policy research
  • policy technologies and policy analysis
  • social class and education policy

Each chapter presents innovative ways of thinking about public policy, asking probing questions about what policy is, how policy is influenced and what effects intentional and unintentional policies have. As a body of work, this collection raises issues of ethics and social justice which are often neglected in the mass of policies that now affect every aspect of our education systems.

Kampanart “Menn” Chaiyarat (2026). Democratic citizenship education under constraint: a critical phenomenological study of teacher agency and everyday resistance. Oxford Review of Education, 1–18. Published online: 27 Jul 2026
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2026.2702439

ABSTRACT
In contexts where democracy is politically constrained, how do teachers continue to teach democratic values without placing themselves or their students at risk? Drawing on a critical phenomenological study of two secondary social studies teachers in Thailand, this article examines how democracy is lived and interpreted in everyday teaching practice. Based on classroom observations, interviews, school shadowing, and analysis of teaching artefacts, the study shows that teachers approach democracy less as a stable political regime or the transmission of civic knowledge and more as a relational and temporally deferred practice. In doing so, they engage in navigational compliance and collective counter-conduct, alongside pedagogical subversion and constructive transformation, to manage institutional risk. Rather than framing these practices as democratic transformation, this article conceptualises them as democratic maintenance, understood as the ongoing work of keeping democratic imagination, participation, and ethical relations alive under constraint. The study contributes to scholarship on teacher agency, everyday resistance, and civic education by theorising democracy as a fragile practice sustained through teachers’ everyday labour.

KEYWORDS:
Democracy, everyday resistance, teacher agency, social studies education, critical phenomenology, Thailand