Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Thompson, Malcolm (2012). “Foucault, fields of governability, and the population-family-economy nexus in China”. History and theory, 51 (1), p. 42-62.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2303.2012.00611.x

Abstract
It was only in the early twentieth century that China discovered that it had a population, at least if a population is understood not as a simple number of people but instead in terms of such features as variable levels of health, birth and death rates, age, sex, dependency ratios, and so onas an object with a distinct rationality and intrinsic dynamics that can be made the target of a specific kind of direct intervention. In 1900, such a developmentalist conception of the population simply did not exist in China; by the 1930s, it pervaded the entire social and political field from top to bottom. Through a reading of a series of foundational texts in population and family reformism in China, this paper argues that this birth of the Chinese population occurred as a result of a general transformation of practices of governing, one that necessarily also involved a reconceptualization of the family and a new logic of overall social rationalization; in short, the isolation of a population family economy nexus as a central field of modern governing. This process is captured by elaborating and extending Foucault’s studies of the historical emergence of apparatuses (dispositifs) into a notion of fields of governability. Finally, this paper argues that the one-child policy, launched in the late 1970s, should be understood not in isolation from the imposition of the family-responsibility system in agriculture and market reforms in exactly that period, but as partmutatis mutandis of a return to a form of governing that was developed in the first half of the twentieth century.

The first issue of an exciting new half-yearly peer reviewed journal entirely dedicated to Foucault and the applications of his thought materiali foucaultiani is now available online. It is open access and freely available for download.

The first issue includes a special section devoted to the “Geographies of power: space and heterotopias, beginning from Foucault”.

materiali foucaultiani is based in Italy and the articles are published in Italian. The journal will soon be publishing the original versions of the articles in French and English in order to disseminate them to a wider audience.

Herrmann, A. F. (2012). “”I Know I’m Unlovable”: Desperation, Dislocation, Despair, and Discourse on the Academic Job Hunt”. Qualitative inquiry, 18 (3), p. 247-55
https://doi.org/10.1177/107780041143156

Abstract
Failure, according to the academic canonical narrative, is anything other than a tenure-track professorship. The academic job hunt is fraught with unknowns: a time of fear, hope, and despair. This personal narrative follows the author’s three-year journey from doctoral candidate, to visiting assistant professor, to the unemployment line. Using a layered account and through a Foucauldian lens the author examines the academic success narrative, delving into the emotional bipolarity during the job search, and the use technologies of the self. It concludes with a reexamination of academic discourses and the canonical narrative of academic success as well as an appeal to continue to do good work.

Richard Sennett: ‘Big society? It’s to keep the bankers happy … ‘ Interview by Andrew Anthony, The Observer, Sunday 12 February 2012

Q: You were friends with the celebrated and late French intellectual Michel Foucault. What was he like?

RS: He was a great friend to me and his other friends. I know he was very forbidding to the public. You read about all the drugs and the sex, which was part of him, but it’s kind of an external portrait, trying to make him into a Nietzschean man. He was also a very sweet, domestic person, a wonderful cook. He and his boyfriend grew tomatoes in between their marijuana plants.

Foucault Reading Group
The Courage of Truth
Manchester University

10am – 12 noon in Geoffrey Manton Room 333, fortnightly, commencing 24th February 2012

This reading group will focus on the last lectures given by Michel Foucault at The Collège de France in February-March 1984, a few months before his death. Continuing the theme of the government of the self introduced in 1982-1983 lectures, this series is more precisely centred on the notion of Greek parrhesia and on the changes it undergoes from the figure of Socrates through that of the Cynic to pre-Christianity.

Questioning the effects of specific relations established between truth, self and life, Foucault endeavours to show how Western metaphysics proceeds from an ethical problematic which deals with these three notions altogether.

The following edition will be used: Michel Foucault, The Courage of Truth: The Government of the Self and Others II”, Lectures at The Collège de France 1983-1984, trans. Graham Burchell (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).

Jessica Whyte, Human Rights: Confronting Governments? Michel Foucault and the Right to Intervene
Published later as chapter in New Critical Legal Thinking. Law and the Political, Edited By Matthew Stone, Illan Wall, Costas Douzinas, Birkbeck Law Press, 2012

The Writing & Society Research Centre and the Philosophy Research Initiative at UWS

TIME: March 21, 2-4pm

Venue: Room 3.G.55
University of Western Sydney
Bankstown Campus,
Australia

ABSTRACT:
In 1981, Foucault delivered the statement “Confronting Governments: Human Rights” at the UN in Geneva. Addressing “all members of the community of the governed”, he argued that the “suffering of men”, too often ignored by Governments, grounds a new right to intervene. In this period, he worked alongside Bernard Kouchner (then head of Médecins san Frontieres/Médecins du Monde, and, until recently, France’s Foreign Minister) who is credited with playing a central role in the development of the norm of humanitarian intervention. This paper suggests that Foucault saw the new activist humanitarianism of the 1970s as heralding the possibility of a new form of right liberated from sovereignty. It examines the tensions of this position, and traces the movement of the “right to intervene” from a right available to NGOs and those Foucault termed “private individuals”, to a new legitimizing doctrine for state militarism. The distance travelled by this new right is indicated by Foucault’s refusal, in 1983, to sign a petition calling for France to take action against Colonel Gaddafi of Libya. Justifying this refusal, Foucault made clear that he did not want to be seen to be calling for war. Today, in the wake of a war in Libya that was justified as a humanitarian intervention, this paper argues that Foucault’s earlier argument that discourses of right serve as masks for power is worthy of further consideration.

BIO:
Jessica Whyte is a lecturer in cultural and social analysis at the University of Western Sydney. She has published widely on contemporary continental philosophy, sovereignty, and human rights. Her PhD on the political thought of Giorgio Agamben was awarded in 2010. She is a co-editor of the Theory and Event Symposium “Form-of-Life: Giorgio Agamben, Ontology, Politics” (2010) and of The Agamben Dictionary (Edinburgh UP, 2011). Her current research is on Michel Foucault’s contribution to the emergence of the ‘right to intervene’, and on its transformation into a legitimizing discourse for state militarism.

La gouvernementalité socialiste

Quatrième soirée-débat :
avec Pierre Dardot et Christian Laval
Saint-Simon et Marx : gouvernement des hommes et administration des choses
mardi 20 mars 2012, à 19h
au Lieu-Dit (6 rue Sorbier, Paris, M° Ménilmontant)
France

Présentation du séminaire :
Dans une formule provocatrice, Michel Foucault estimait « qu’il n’y a pas de gouvernementalité socialiste autonome » ; il en concluait que cette gouvernementalité, « il faut l’inventer ». Y a-t-il un art socialiste de gouverner? Comment penser ensemble l’émancipation socialiste et les impératifs de l’organisation? Le socialisme ne signifie-t-il pas, par essence, l’extinction de la politique et des rapports de pouvoir? Ou, à l’inverse, la tradition socialiste, de la Commune de Paris à Porto Alegre, de Flora Tristan à Evo Morales, n’est-elle pas riche de réflexions et pratiques autour de nouvelles manières de conduire les hommes – jusque dans ses échecs les plus notables?

Réinterroger la réalité et la possibilité d’une politique du socialisme qui ne soient ni celle de la bureaucratie d’État ni celle d’un libéralisme tempéré, telle est l’ambition de ce séminaire qui se tiendra au Lieu-Dit, de janvier à juin 2012. Avec des historiens, sociologues, militants, philosophes ou économistes, le public est invité à échanger librement sur les questions suivantes : une gouvernementalité socialiste est-elle possible? Et si oui, à quoi pourrait-elle bien ressembler?

Au-delà de la campagne électorale qui battra son plein, dans un contexte de crise globale historique et de renouvellement des formes de mobilisation sociale, ces soirées-débats seront l’occasion d’aller plus loin que la critique du néolibéralisme, en (re)découvrant collectivement les réalités et les virtualités du socialisme et de sa politique.
Calendrier 2012 :

31 janvier : Laurent Jeanpierre & Luc Boltanski
14 février : Samuel Hayat & Michèle Riot-Sarcey
6 mars : Yves Cohen & Paolo Napoli
20 mars : Pierre Dardot & Christian Laval
3 avril : Yves Citton & Frédéric Lordon
15 mai : table-ronde militante sur les modes passés et présents d’organisation et d’action collective.

Contacts : Isabelle Bruno (izabruno@gmail.com) et Arnault Skornicki (askornicki@yahoo.fr)
Séminaire organisé avec le soutien d’Editions Amsterdam et de RdL, la Revue des Livres

Via Variazione foucaultiani

Encountering the Other: Philosophical Perspectives on Recognition

Date: Saturday, 31st March 2012
Time: 9am-6pm
Venue: Newman House, St. Stephen’s Green, Dublin 2, Ireland

Speakers:

Lois McNay (Oxford University)
Alice Le Goff (Université Paris V Descartes)
Katherine Morris (Oxford University)
Arto Laitinen (University of Jyväskylä, Finland)
Robin Celikates (University of Amsterdam)
Respondents: To be Confirmed

Workshop Description:

The workshop contrasts recognitive perspectives on social interaction, particularly from the German critical theory tradition, with a range of alternative philosophical perspectives, particularly drawn from contemporary French philosophy and phenomenology, which explore alternative understandings and modalities through which social interaction is experienced.

The participants in the workshop seek to explore critical perspectives on the concept of recognition understood as the basis of normative interaction and the condition of social freedom. Papers will focus on issues such as recognition and embodiment, recognition and the politics of needs, reification, experiences of misrecognition and the ways in which recognition might be imbued with power, and the implications of a theory of recognition for collective action. The papers will draw on the work of philosophers such as Jean-Paul Sartre, Axel Honneth, Michel Foucault, Maurice Merleau-Ponty and others.

Program

9.45 am: Welcome

10.00-11.00: Lois McNay (Oxford University)
‘The Politics of Suffering and Recognition: Foucault contra Honneth’

11.00-11.30: Coffee

11.30-12.30: Alice Le Goff (Université Paris V Descartes)
‘Recognition, Freedom and Collective Action in Sartre’

12.30-13.30: Katherine Morris (Oxford University)
‘Merleau-Ponty and Bodily Reciprocity: Understanding Other Others’

13.30-15.00 Lunch

15.00-16.00 Arto Laitinen (University of Jyväskylä, Finland)
‘Ricoeur on Recognition: Fallible Man, Oneself as Another and Course of Recognition’

16.00-17.00 Robin Celikates (University of Amsterdam)
‘Recognition and the Politics of Needs’

All welcome! If you would like to attend this event please email Danielle Petherbridge (danielle.petherbridge@ucd.ie) or Luna Dolezal (luna.dolezal@ucd.ie).

The second South Asian Governmentalities Workshop will be held at the British Academy in London on Friday 30 March 2012.

This is part of a series of workshops organised through the BASAS South Asian Governmentalities Research Group. Attendance is free but limited to those who pre-register. The concept of governmentality has exerted an ever growing influence in South Asian studies, for scholars working on both colonial and post-colonial contexts. It has inspired South Asian work on “deep democracy” and urban governmentality (Appadurai, 2002), the politics of the governed (Chatterjee, 2004, 2011), the Indian public sphere and economy (Kalpagam, 2000, 2002), agrarian capital (Gidwani, 2008), cinema and the end of empire (Jaikumar, 2006), knowledge transfer and urban politics (McFarlane, 2011), colonial urbanism (Legg, 2007), health and hygiene (Heath, 2010), aesthetics and slum politics (Ghertner, 2010), gender and imperial social formations (Sinha, 2006), the colonial economy (Birla, 2009, Goswami, 2004), and race and violence (Kolsky, 2010). Such works have raised governmentality to the status of near-orthodoxy for much South Asian research. The workshop has been generously funded by the British Association of South Asian Studies and the British Academy

Via Stuart Elden’s blog Progressive Geographies

Foucault Circle 2012 conference
Canisius College
Buffalo, NY

Further information

All sessions will be held on the main floor of the Montante Cultural Center, located at Main and
Eastwood Streets on the Canisius College campus.

Friday evening, March 30th
Reception – Time and location TBA

Saturday, March 31st
9-10:45 – Power and Resistance
Moderator: Pär Widén, Malmő University

“Where There is Resistance, There is Power: A Revision of the Concept of Co-originality”
Marco Checchi, Radboud University

‘Between Foucault and Ekeh: Governmentality and the “Two Publics” in Africa’
Wale Adebanwi, U.C. Davis

“Beyond the Neo-liberal Paradigm: Foucault on the Multiplicity of Power-relations and the Critical Force of the Care of the Self”
Edward McGushin, Stonehill College

11- 12:10 – The Organic and the Inorganic
Moderator: Jonas Qvarsebo, Malmő University

“Abnormal Appetites: Foucault and the Politics of Food”
Chloё Taylor, University of Alberta

“Plasticization as Necrophilia: Death, Decomposition, and the Inorganic in Foucault”
Kelsey Borrowman, Stony Brook University

12:10-1:30 – Lunch

1:30-3:15 – Prisons and Imprisonment
Moderator: Thom Axelsson, Malmő University

“The New Asylums: Madness and Mass Incarceration in the Neoliberal Era”
Michael Rembis, SUNY Buffalo

“Isolate and Manage: The Birth of the Supermax”
Kristin Li, McGill University

“Imprisonment Begins in the Mind”
Anwar Harper, Kingsborough Community College, CUNY

3:30-4:45 –Discussion of GIP Documents
Facilitators: Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn, DePaul University

5:00 – Business Meeting

Dinner – Time and location TBA

Sunday, April 1st
9-10:45 – Ethics and Politics
Moderator: Sam Talcott, University of the Sciences

“Stoicism’s Hermeneutic of Interpretation and its Political Implications”
Robin Weiss, DePaul University

“Integrity, Misanthropy, Democracy”
Robert Nichols, University of Alberta

“Real Bodies in Real Spaces? Rethinking Anatomo-politics for the Twenty-first Century”
Sophie Fuggle, King’s College London

11-12:10 – Madness
Moderator: Sam Binkley, Emerson College

“Indeterminacies: Of Madness, Animality, and Theatricality in Foucault’s History of Madness and J.M. Coetzee’s Lives of Animals”
Corey McCall, Elmira College

“Foucault’s Madness: Re-reading the Foucault-Derrida Debate Through the 1961 Preface”
Eric Jonas, Northwestern University

The Program Committee wishes to thank Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn for their work in translating the GIP documents used in Saturday’s discussion.