Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Drazenovich, George (2012). “A Foucauldian Analysis of Homosexuality”. Educational philosophy and theory, 44 (3), pp. 259-75.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00653.x

Abstract
The present research paper approaches homosexuality from a Foucauldian perspective. Foucault’s place and standing in a postmodern historical and cultural context will be explained. The paper outlines how homosexuality has been historically constructed and socially constituted. How sexuality became understood as a particular form of discourse, that is as a science, will be explored particularly with regard to the strategic use of confession as a producer of knowledge. I will present how homosexuality, as a medicalized, ontological identity was implanted in bodies and an entire pathological population was created. To reverse an excessive medicalized discourse of homosexuality, Foucault’s prescription of moving to the care of self and predicating sexuality on the pleasure of bodies as opposed to scientific or clinical ideology will be discussed. Such critical analysis facilitates new imaginative spaces that can enable educators to engage in meaningful and informed dialogue around the various discourses surrounding homosexuality in a postmodern historical and cultural context.

Thomas, Andrea S. (2012). “Michel de Ghelderode, the Wooster Group, and postmodernist revisions of La tentation de saint Antoine”.  Orbis litterarum , 67 (2), p. 136-53.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0730.2011.01046.x

Abstract
La tentation de saint Antoine initially recalls Hieronymus Bosch’s famous Renaissance painting or Flaubert’s onieric work-in-progress. A closer look at more recent adaptations of the story of Saint Anthony the Great, however, reveals that such transformations of the myth addressed shifting aesthetics in the twentieth century by combining genres and texts, designed to cast what Foucault considered Flauberts most modernist ideas in an entirely postmodern light. This paper examines two of these adaptations: first, Michel de Ghelderode’s multiple versions of the tale set in Flanders, published separately from 1919 to 1932, but not performed until 1957 as a radio play and marionette show; and, second, the Wooster Groups provocative stage adaptation, which transplanted the hermit Anthony to an excess-filled New York of the eighties in Frank Dell’s The Temptation of Saint Antony.

What Flaubert created as a self-reflexive commentary on the dangers of books, twentieth-century adaptors turned into a postmodern statement about other contemporary media forms, including stage, radio, cinema, and television. More importantly, by strategically appropriating not only Flaubert’s subject matter, but also his composition technique and passages from his texts, these artists draw attention to the perils of a culture-saturated twentieth century in which art had become adaptation.

From the new ‘Between Foucault and Deleuze’ website.

August 2025 update: This site no longer exists. The link above is to the site as it was captured by the Wayback Machine in 2015

The aim of the “Between Deleuze and Foucault” project is to establish an on-going collaborative and synergistic relationship between Purdue University and the Université de Paris VIII–Vincennes à St. Denis (University of Paris 8, Vincennes-St. Denis) in order to transcribe, translate, and make available online the seminars that the French philosopher Gilles Deleuze gave on Michel Foucault’s work at the University of Paris 8 during the years 1985-1986.

Read more…

A transcription of Foucault’s replies to questions from the audience at Berkeley’s History Department in 1983 can be found on the Variazione foucaultiane site. The transcription is by Arianna Bove and there are links to the audio on Stuart Elden’s Progressive Geographies blog.

Audrey Kiéfer et David Risse (eds). La biopolitique outre-atlantique après Foucault, Editions Harmattan, 2012

From the détentions et rétentions carcérales blog

Principe de précaution. Bioéthique. Multiplication et diversification des dispositifs de contrôle des corps. Sexualité. Placement sous surveillance électronique. Village d’insertion pour les communautés Roms. Ces dispositifs de pouvoirs se présentent-ils comme rassurants, novateurs, libéralisateurs ? Ou bien, au contraire, se posent-ils comme des systèmes insidieux, indéchiffrables, effrayants ou simplement normalisants ?

Que penser de ces nouveaux modes de contrôle qui émergent ou dominent nos sociétés ?

Foucault ne parlait pas, stricto sensu, de sociétés de contrôle mais, pour satisfaire le « pacte de sécurité », des contrôles toujours plus fins se mettent en place et se structurent. Pour conceptualiser cette gestion du pluriel, cette régulation des flux, ce contrôle des corps, Foucault parlait, non plus de « discipline » comme il le faisait à propos de la majoration des forces individuelles, mais plutôt, de biopolitique.

Devons-nous alors comprendre cette mutation et division du contrôle comme une biopolitisation de la société ?

Ce livre, issu d’un colloque international organisé à Ottawa en 2009, espère apporter quelques éléments de réponse à ces questions : d’abord par des analyses théorico-critiques de la pensée foucaldienne ; ensuite, par une attention portée à l’actualité et aux usages contemporains de la biopolitique. Enraciné dans la réalité d’Outre-Atlantique, cet ouvrage offre au lecteur une vision élargie et plurielle de la biopolitique. En prenant acte de la diversité des approches françaises et nord-américaines, le lecteur pourra apprécier les convergences et les différences de points de vue.

SOMMAIRE :

INTRODUCTION par Audrey Kiéfer et David Risse

1° Une généalogie du pouvoir :

Alexandre Mac Millan : Pouvoir souverain et pouvoir sur la vie : Continuité et rupture dans l’histoire des relations de pouvoir chez Foucault.

Julie Mazaleigue : Le corps sexuel, entre discipline et biopouvoir. Une lecture critique du « dispositif de sexualité ».

Stéphanie Martens : Le concept de biopolitique chez Foucault : entre souveraineté et gouvernementalité.

Arona Moreau : Foucault et le renouveau de la pensée politique.

2° La population, un concept central :

Karlis Racevsis : La fin de l’homme et de l’exception humaine.

Hervé Oulc’hen : La population, émergence d’un concept technologique.

Luca Paltrinieri : L’émergence de la population : Mirabeau, Quesnay, Moheau.

3° Le sujet et la santé, des outils biopolitiques :

Louise Blais : Le couple conceptuel : Savoirs savants/savoirs ordinaires.

Carole Clavier : Biopolitique et santé publique. Réflexion sur les usages du concept en santé publique.

4° De la sécurité, au nom du thérapeutique ou du désirable ?

Thomas Foth et Dave Holmes : Gestion biopolitique d’une population captive.

Fabrice Duclos : Gouvernementalité et contrôle des corps : pour une biopolitique de la pharmaceutique.

Olivier Razac : Il faut lutter contre les morts prématurées.

Paul La Bas : Biopolitique des gens du voyage.

Tony Ferri : La biopolitique et le Placement sous surveillance électronique (P.S.E.).

POSTFACE de Lawrence Olivier

Luis Lobo-Guerrero, Insuring War: Sovereignty, Security and Risk, Routledge (Interventions Series), 2012, ISBN: 978-0-415-61772-7

Publisher’s web page

Description
Insurance is a central, if until now ignored, instrument of war in the modern period. Ever since the eighteenth century, interaction between governments and insurers in Western countries has materialised in the form of war risk schemes that have contributed to the waging of war and the preservation of peace. The operation of those schemes has given rise to a curious, if not innocent, association between practices of statehood and practices of risk, which are theorised here under the label of ‘insurantial sovereignty’.

The book draws on the British experience of using maritime insurance as an instrument of war during the Napoleonic Wars, the two World Wars, and the early twenty-first century. It asks, what happens, when, under conditions of war, the sovereign adopts insurantial imaginaries and practices into its rationalities of government? In doing so the book makes a novel contribution to the understanding of liberal security and liberal governance which is central to the theory of Political Science and International Relations, the understanding of international political sociology, and international political economy.

The book follows Insuring Security: Biopolitics, Security and Risk as the second of a trilogy that analyses how concepts and practices of power, risk and security materialise in the form of insurance as a central instrument of governance in the liberal world.

Reviews of Insuring War

Insuring War does much more than show how important practices of insurance were to the development of modern warfare and security. Historically rich and theoretically sophisticated, the book demonstrates the central importance of the Probabilistic Revolution and secular risk calculation to the very possibility of sovereignty and modern statehood. Highly recommended to students of International Relations and International Political Economy alike.
Marieke de Goede, Professor of Politics, University of Amsterdam

Lobo-Guerrero’s Insuring War is, first and foremost an important contribution to political thinking. Eschewing the traditional framing of violent conflict that foregrounds executive decision-making, arms races, and geopolitical alliances, Insuring War makes evident that what is central to the politics of deadly engagements is “the concerted art of managing uncertainty.”
Michael Shapiro, Professor of Political Science, University of Hawai’i at Mãnoa, USA

Luis Lobo-Guerrero is what I consider to be one of the foremost scholars in International Relations and specifically Critical Security Studies. Inspired by Michel Foucault’s analytics and methods and forming part of a triptych devoted to insurance and security, Lobo-Guerrero provides in this volume a fascinating and original investigation into insurance and its uses in time of war.
Vivienne Jabri, Professor of International Politics, King’s College London

From Le Monde, 14 April 2012

The French government has decided to classify the Foucault archives as a ‘national treasure’ and has forbidden the export of these archives. This move has taken place as a ‘preventative measure’ against the sale of these 37,000 pages of documents abroad.

L’Etat français a décidé de classer “trésor national” les archives du philosophe Michel Foucault et interdit leur exportation, par un avis publié samedi 14 avril au Journal Officiel.

Saisie par le ministère de la culture, la Commission consultative des Trésors nationaux fait valoir que cette réunion de 37 000 feuillets, manuscrits et textes dactylographiés couvrant quarante années, “est unique pour la compréhension et l’étude de l’oeuvre de Michel Foucault”, décédé en 1984. “En conséquence, cet ensemble de biens présente un intérêt majeur pour le patrimoine national du point de vue de l’histoire et de l’art et doit être considéré comme un trésor national”.

Interrogé samedi, le ministère de la culture a indiqué qu’il pouvait s’agir d’une “mesure préventive” afin d’empêcher la vente de ces documents à l’étranger.

Friday, April 27, 2012 – 3 pm

Università degli Studi di Padova
piazza Capitaniato 3, Padova
Sala delle Edicole

Roundtable on Michel Foucault, “Sull’origine dell’ermeneutica del sé. Due conferenze al Dartmouth College”, edited and translated by mf / materiali foucaultiani (Cronopio, Napoli, 2012)

With:
Judith Revel (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)
Sandro Chignola (Università di Padova)
Daniele Lorenzini (Université Paris-Est / Università La Sapienza Roma)
Martina Tazzioli (Goldsmiths College London)

Further info

Cox, Barbara; Pringle, Richard (2012). “Gaining a foothold in football: A genealogical analysis of the emergence of the female footballer in New Zealand”. International review for the sociology of sport, 47 (2), pp. 217-34.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690211403203

Abstract
In this article we adopted Foucault’s genealogical approach to examine the emergence of the female footballer in the early 1970s. Results from in-depth interviews and document analyses indicated that these female footballers were discursively constructed as submissive, heterosexual, non-feminists, who were supportive of male football and entertainment. We relatedly argue, in a seemingly paradoxical manner, that female footballers emerged into the male domain because they were disciplined by discourses of normalized femininity and, as such, were understood as bodies not worthy of serious consideration. The power effect of this positioning was that female football was not perceived as a threat to the existing gender order and, accordingly, there was no need to invest political concern or future money to their existence. This miscalculation, or accident of history, provided a window of opportunity that allowed the neophyte players to taste the pleasures of ‘running with the ball at their feet’ and to develop a love of the game. We concluded that the pleasure that these women gained from their involvement in football, plus the prevailing discourses of liberal feminism, acted as productive forces that enabled them to endure and eventually challenge gender inequities.

Purabi Bose, Bas Arts, Han van Dijk, (2012). “‘Forest governmentality’: A genealogy of subject-making of forest-dependent ‘scheduled tribes’ in India”. Land use policy, 29 (3), pp. 664-73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.11.002

Abstract
This paper analyses the historical trajectories of both British colonial rule and independent India to categorise scheduled tribes and to appropriate and legalise forests in tribal areas. It builds upon Foucault’s notion of governmentality to argue that the history of the scheduled tribes’ subject-making and the related history of forest demarcation is indispensable for understanding the current politics of decentralised forest management in India. Three dimensions of ‘forest governmentality’ – the history of categorisation, the politics of social identity, and the technologies of forest governance – are discussed to show how recent efforts to politicise forest tenure rights have reinforced political control over the scheduled tribes through new forms of authority, inclusion and exclusion. However, to claim their individual and community right to forestland and resources, the scheduled tribes have internalised their ‘new’ ethnic identity, thereby creating countervailing power and room to manoeuvre within the current forest governance regime. This is supported by a case study of the Bhil, a predominantly forest-dependent scheduled tribe in the semi-arid region of western India.