Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Boano, C., Leclair-Paquet, B.
Potential, freedom and space: Reflections on Agamben’s potentialities in the West Bank
(2014) Space and Polity, Published online Feb 2014

Abstract
A special kind of infrastructure has emerged around the West Bank, which lays bare Israel’s capacity to spatialise its colonial power and to constantly solidify its presence. Reading these spatial devices through Agamben’s work, this paper proposes a reflective attempt to read this site of contemporary occupation through a “resistant” lens as a novel take on Agamben’s spatial topology and political aesthetics. The paper offers preliminary remarks on the search for alternative theoretical construction of Agamben “potentialities”. The paper allow speculations on the heterotopian nature of Israeli produced infrastructures, perceived at once as actualised potentials in space, and spaces of potential.

Author Keywords
Agamben; conflicted spaces; Foucault; heterotopian infrastructures; Israel; potentiality; West Bank

DOI: 10.1080/13562576.2013.880010

Hardie, M.
Making Visible the Invisible Act of Doping
(2014) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 27 (1), pp. 85-119.

Abstract
This paper describes the construction of the visual space of surveillance by the global anti-doping apparatus, it is a space inhabited daily by professional cyclists. Two principal mechanisms of this apparatus will be discussed-the Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport; in order to illustrate how this space is constructed and how it visualises the invisible act of doping. These mechanisms act to supervise and govern the professional cyclist and work to classify them as either clean or dirty in terms of the use of prohibited doping substances or methods. Contrary to the analysis of liberal anti-doping scholars such as Hanstad, Loland and Møller this paper argues that Foucault’s Panopticon paradigm is a useful tool for the analysis of this apparatus. The Whereabouts System and Biological Passport are the instruments by which the anti-doping apparatus intensifies the construction of the space of surveillance in professional sport. This space of surveillance not only locates and makes visible the physical location of each individual cyclist, but it also makes visible their internal bodily functions, in this case the composition and the fluctuations of the composition of their blood. In making the cyclist visible the instruments do not allow the cause of doping, or the event of doping to be known or observed. Rather what they do is cast the body in terms of abnormalities of time, place or blood. In the case of an abnormality of the cyclist’s blood, the cause itself cannot be identified with any certainty, all that is made visible is a suggestion, or a probability, that doping may have occurred. The ultimate effects are twofold-an internalisation and continual monitoring of one’s self as well as by the authorities, and a radical change in the nature and the definition of the offence of doping. No longer is it positive evidence of doping that is punishable, but what becomes punishable is an abnormality, in the cyclist’s location, or their body, which suggests a probability that the invisible act of doping may have occurred. In the course of this process accepted manners of proving an offence by the use of scientific evidence and expert commentary are transformed. The Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport open up a new manner in which the invisible can be visualised. Through the discourse and the attendant commentary of the expert a new alliance between doping and the law is constructed. The result is a redistribution of the way in which the law visualises and treats the symptoms (the signifier) and the signified act of doping. The Whereabouts System and Biological Passport are the instruments by which the anti-doping apparatus intensifies the construction of the space of surveillance in professional sport. This space of surveillance not only locates and makes visible the physical location of each individual cyclist, but it also makes visible their internal bodily functions, in this case the composition and the fluctuations of the composition of their blood. In making the cyclist visible the instruments do not allow the cause of doping, or the event of doping to be known or observed. Rather what they do is cast the body in terms of abnormalities of time, place or blood. In the case of an abnormality of the cyclists’s blood, the cause itself cannot be identified with any certainty, all that is made visible is a suggestion, or a probability, that doping may have occurred. The ultimate effects are twofold-an internalisation and continual monitoring of one’s self as well as by the authorities, and a radical change in the nature and the definition of the offence of doping. No longer is it positive evidence of doping that is punishable, but what becomes punishable is an abnormality, in the cyclist’s location, or their body, which suggests a probability that the invisible act of doping may have occurred. In the course of this process accepted manners of proving an offence by the use of scientific evidence and expert commentary are transformed. The Whereabouts System and the Biological Passport open up a new manner in which the invisible can be visualised. Through the discourse and the attendant commentary of the expert a new alliance between doping and the law is constructed. The result is a redistribution of the way in which the law visualises and treats the symptoms (the signifier) and the signified act of doping

Author Keywords
Biological passport; Biopower; Doping; Foucault; International cycling union; Panopticon; Professional cycling; Society of control; Society of the spectacle; Whereabouts; World anti doping code

DOI: 10.1007/s11196-013-9311-3

Viernes, N.
The Magistrate is the Muse: Law and Visual Economy in Bangkok
(2014) International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 27 (1), pp. 27-46.

Abstract
Governmentality is a spatial formation negotiated within historically-constituted political landscapes. In Bangkok, this spatialization of power is manifested in the militarization of urban life and the protocols of security procedure, but also in anti-government protests and an increasingly politicized visual culture. The memory and meaning of the city’s streets exist as an overlooked legibility that challenges the visual strategies of government control. Monuments, travel routes, and other public sites of national recognition now compete in an extended urban arena of images, such as literature and cinema, which re-stage governmentality and the material contours of Thailand’s contemporary political disagreements outside of its institutional norms. I read this intersection between governing and image circulation through the development of a visual economy in Bangkok and depict how different communities-including a bureaucratized military and a populist political party, but also writers and filmmakers-intervene in its circulation. Each group zooms in on key spaces of the city in the attempt to speak to changing forms of governmentality.

Author Keywords
Apichatpong Weerasethakul; Bangkok; Foucault; Governmentality; Street politics

DOI: 10.1007/s11196-013-9318-9

Webb, P.T.
Policy problematization
(2014) International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 27 (3), pp. 364-376.

Abstract
This article places Michel Foucault’s concept of problematization in relation to educational policy research. My goal is to examine a key assumption of policy related to “solving problems” through such technologies. I discuss the potential problematization has to alter conceptions of policy research; and, through this discussion, I provide a set of alternative pragmatics with which to conduct research for, and on, education policy.

Author Keywords
Foucault; policy; problematization

DOI: 10.1080/09518398.2012.762480

Philosophers DVD
Author(s): Moderator and commentator Fons Elders
Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault
Sir Alfred Ayer and Arne Naess
Leszek Kolakowski and Henri Lefèbvre
Sir Karl Popper and Sir John Eccles

A series by Fons Elders

This DVD is available at a more reasonable price from Fons Elders’ site than from Icarus films.

Review by Brian Boling

In 1971, a Dutch initiative called the International Philosophers Project brought together the leading thinkers of the day for a series of one-on-one debates. The participants included intellectual superstars Alfred Ayer and Arne Naess, Karl Popper and John Eccles, Leszek Kolakowski and Henri Lefèbvre, and – most notably, in a now justifiably famous exchange – Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault.

This two-disc set collects all four remarkable conversations, along with introductions and commentary by Dutch philosopher and writer Fons Elders. Elders moderated the original debates – hand-picking each of the participants after spending some time getting to know them. Now, looking back four decades later, he offers perspective and context, summarizing the arguments and highlighting the key moments of each debate.


DISC ONE (80 and 74 minutes)

Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault  

The Chomsky-Foucault debate has become a much-studied classic. This DVD captures all the energy and passion of the two philosophers, as they discuss whether or not some form of universal human nature – an inherent ability to understand language and scientific concepts, for instance – exists, or whether our responses are purely socially and culturally conditioned.

Alfred Ayer and Arne Naess  

A lively debate between British empiricist Alfred Ayer, who champions a limited skepticism, and Norwegian philosopher Arne Naess, the founder of the deep ecology movement, whose philosophy embraces interconnectedness.


DISC TWO (80 and 77 minutes)

Karl Popper and John Eccles  

Historian of science Karl Popper and his close friend, Nobel-prize-winning neuroscientist John Eccles, discuss Popper’s famous criterion of falsifiability: the idea that a statement is only scientific if it could possibility be proved false, which he had articulated against the traditional positivist view of the scientific method.

Leszek Kolakowski and Henri Lefèbvre  

Polish philosopher Leszek Kolakowski and French thinker Henri Lefèbvre (both former Communist Party members) debate the ongoing significance of Marxism and the concept of alienation – while at the same time struggling to define what a future, post-capitalist society might hold.


 
 

Each of these conversations captures the intellectual and social ferment of the late 1960s and early 1970s, when dramatic social and economic transformation seemed imminent – and philosophical questions underpinned discussions about what form the new society would take. Though many of the questions under discussion are timeless, this social and political context gives them a particular sense of urgency.

f71

Vendredi 23 mai à 22h, dans le cadre de La Nuit des idées, Notre corps utopique, Théâtre National de Bordeaux Aquitaine (33)
Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page ou cette page

Atelier à la Maison d’Arrêt de Fresnes
Du 8 au 25 avril, Corps tatoué, corps utopique?, Atelier à la Maison d’Arrêt de Fresnes avec le SPIP 94 et le MAC/VAL

Le petit corps utopique
Après Notre corps utopique, et librement inspiré du même texte de Foucault,
le collectif F71 prépare un spectacle pour tous à partir de 6 ans, Le petit corps utopique
Création prévue en mars 2015

Du 5 mai au 3 juin 2014, résidence de création à l’école Ferdinand Buisson de Mantes-la-Jolie (78) avec le Collectif 12
Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page

Contact
Mélanie Autier, 06 22 13 06 82, production.collectiff71@gmail.com
Christelle Kongolo, 06 15 87 39 64, diffusion.collectiff71@gmail.com
Rejoignez-nous sur notre page facebook, ici
www.collectiff71.com

Séminaire “Foucault: l’oeuvre continue”

Pontifical Catholic University (PUCRS)
Dept of Philosophy – C. Postal 1429
Porto Alegre, RS 90619-900 Brazil

ROFESSEURS: Dr. Norman Madarasz et Dr. Nythamar de Oliveira

CRÉDITS: 3.0 45 h ANNÉE/SEMESTRE: 2014/1
Mercredi 14:00 h – Salle 205 Bâtiment 40 (Fac d’Informatique) PUCRS

DESCRIPTION DU SÉMINAIRE

Dans les trente années depuis la mort de Michel Foucault, l’oeuvre de l’auteur des Mots et les Choses est sousmise à de divers découpage, montage, déconstruction, réfutation, relativisation et minoration, quand il ne s’agit pas de simples tentatives d’effacement. Pourtant, l’oeuvre continue de servir de modèles pour maintes orientations de pensée et de savoir. Son nominalisme externaliste met à défi la refonte des projets de fondation ontologique du penser ; son historicisme vient non pas tant à exposer la conscience et les énoncés du vrai comme autant d’effets d’un régime conceptual soumis à la finitude radicale, que attester de la difficulté à cerner l’énonciation inconsciente des catégories de la subjetivation ; et son recoupement de l’histoire de la philosophie écarte la pratique théorique entre une science du discours et une éthique positiviste de la division du vrai. Ces orientations font de l’oeuvre de Foucault un défi pour un dépassement de la philosophie par un discours post-humaniste encore en recherche de son nom, discours qui ne peut faire l’économie d’un rejet des propositions institutionnelles dont l’objectif est de neutraliser par absorption la puissance critique que la philosophie tient sur l’avenir de la science et de son application à la vie biotechnicisée. L’oeuvre appelle ainsi à une saisie continue.

OBJECTIFS:
Ce semestre, le Programa de Pós-Graduação em Filosofia de l’Université Catholique de Porto Alegre (PUCRS) a l’honneur de présenter le séminaire de 2e et 3e cycle en langue française dédiqué à l’oeuvre de Foucault, sous la direction des professeurs Nythamar de Oliveira et Norman Madarasz. L’objectif en est de reprendre rigoureusement et en détail la progression de l’oeuvre de Foucault en tant que projet expansif de recherche, depuis la critique des institutions de l’asile, de l’hôpital psychiatrique et de la clinique, du tout début de l’oeuvre, jusqu’aux prisons et la biopolitique, depuis l’analyse structurale des sciences humaines et une linguistique de l’inconscient jusqu’aux thèses sur la gouvernamentalité et la prévision d’une nouvelle subjectivité des plaisirs au-delà de la morale et de la culpabilité.

METHODOLOGIE:

Le format du cours aura le style de séminaire. Chaque professeur dirigera les séances en quinze à quinze jours. Les élèves seront encouragé(e)s à participer aux discussions et à faire des exposés de travail. Les exposés de travail devront suivre le format général du séminaire, pouvant être un compte rendu de lectures ou bien un article original. L’assistance régulière est une exigence pour suivre la progression de la discussion, aussi bien que pour participer à l’esprit collectif de recherché.

Reportage de GrandLille TV sur l’exposition Michel Foucault à Lille 3. Mars 2014

clarisMichel Foucault – Freedom and Knowledge
Author(s): Edited by Fons Elders and Lionel Claris
Elders Special Productions BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. ISBN 978-90-805600-6-2 NUR 730

You can purchase this book as a paperback or an ebook. An extract can also be found on Lionel Claris’ academia.edu site and you can find a version of Lynne Huffer’s introduction via a link in this earlier post on Foucault news

Contents

1, Preface by Fons Elders

2. Introduction by Lynne Huffer,
What Could Be Otherwise

Notes Introduction

3. Fons Elders’ response letter to Lynne Huffer

4. Michel Foucault,
Freedom and Knowledge
A first-time published interview by Fons Elders, translated by Lionel Claris

5. Michel Foucault: Retrospective Commentaries
by Fons Elders

Part I –The Interview,
The Question of Paradise

Part II –The Debate:
Human Nature: Justice versus Power
Noam Chomsky and Michel Foucault

Part III –Michel Foucault – My Personal View

Notes
Index of Names
Index of Subjects
Biography

Here is a link again to the newly rediscovered 1971 Foucault interview on Dutch television referred to in this book.

pb Didier Deleule and François Guéry (2014) The Productive Body. Translated and introduced by Philip Barnard and Stephen Shapiro. London: Zero Books.

The Productive Body asks how the human body and its labor have been expropriated and re-engineered through successive stages of capitalism; and how capitalism’s transformation of the body is related to the rise of scientific psychology and social science disciplines complicit with modern regimes of control. In Discipline and Punish, Foucault cited Guéry and Deleule in order to link Marx’s diagnosis of capitalism with his own critique of power/knowledge. The Productive Body brings together Marxism and theories of the body-machine for the goal of political revolution.

Foucault’s remark in Discipline and Punish (chapter on Panopticism)

At a less general level, the technological mutations of the apparatus of production, the division of labour and the elaboration of the disciplinary techniques sustained an ensemble of very close relations (cf. Marx, Capital, vol. 1, chapter XIII and the very interesting analysis in Guéry and Deleule).