Foucault News

Michel Foucault va faire son entrée dans La Pléiade (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

6 September 2015

Michel Foucault va faire son entrée dans La Pléiade,

L’œuvre du philosophe sera publiée le 5 novembre par la Bibliothèque de la Pléiade, aux éditions Gallimard.

Le Monde.fr avec AFP | 20.07.2015 à 19h13

Michel Foucault va faire, bientôt, son entrée dans la Bibliothèque de la Pléiade. C’est le 5 novembre, a confirmé au Monde Gallmard, que paraîtront les deux volumes regroupés sous le titre Œuvres dans la prestigieuse collection.

Figure de la philosophie des années 1960, historien, militant, titulaire d’une chaire au Collège de France, Michel Foucault est mort en 1984, à l’âge de 57 ans. Un peu plus de trente ans après sa mort, celui qui a écrit sur le pouvoir, la médecine ou la sexualité est célébré comme l’un des plus grands penseurs du XX^e siècle. Il est aussi l’un des auteurs de sciences humaines les plus cités au monde. L’an dernier, ses archives, classées « trésor national » par le gouvernement français, ont été rachetées par la Bibliothèque de France.

Auteur de plusieurs ouvrages à son sujet, c’est le philosophe Frédéric Gros qui dirige la publication des œuvres de Michel Foucault par la Pléiade. Histoire de la folie, Naissance de la clinique, Les Mots et les Choses, L’Archéologie du savoir, L’Ordre du discours, Surveiller et punir, les trois volumes de L’Histoire de la sexualité ainsi qu’une sélection d’articles vont ainsi être rassemblés.

« Devenir un classique, c’est bien sûr ambigu dans le cas de Foucault, a expliqué Frédéric Gros au magazine Télérama. Il ne construisait pas son œuvre dans la perspective d’être réuni un jour en un tout, clos sur lui-même. Sa vision de l’écriture était différente, davantage située dans la discontinuité, la rupture, et dans le fait de privilégier les infra-écritures, les marges littéraires. »

With thanks to Stuart Elden at Progressive Geographies for this news

David Banks, The Conservative Hacker – Cyborgology (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

no comments

5 September 2015

David Banks, The Conservative Hacker – Cyborgology, August 26, 2015

“Lone Hacker in Warehouse” by Brian Klug

The hacker label is, as Foucault might say, a “dubious unity.” The single phrase can barely contain its constituent multitude. Even if every single person that self-identified as a hacker had a stable definition, the media would warp, expand, and misunderstand the definition to include all sorts of other identities, tactics, and personas. We cannot know what is in the hearts and minds of every person that feels an allegiance to the hacker brand but this past week’s Ashley Madison hack, where deeply private information was leaked supposedly in the name of consumer protection, forces a conversation about the politics of hacking. Are hackers fundamentally conservative if not in intention, then in deed?

Archive: Todd Meyers interviews Paul Rabinow (2013)

Clare O'Farrell

no comments

4 September 2015

Todd Meyers interviews Paul Rabinow
On the Logic of Anthropological Inquiry: A Conversation with Paul Rabinow, Los Angeles Review of Books, November 4th, 2013

FOR DECADES Paul Rabinow has been producing scholarship that tightens the aperture around what it means to write and think with anthropology. His work is ambitious and broad-reaching, yet at its core there is a preoccupation with the details of practice as well as modes of inquiry and their ethical, conceptual, tangible dimensions — the stuff of “doing” fieldwork in the interpretive social sciences. Rabinow’s work operates through numerous valences: it is driven by personal intellectual commitments articulated in a distinct voice, yet remains fiercely collaborative; it tackles areas seemingly absent of human presence (the laboratory, the administrative life of private and public sector biosciences research, the domain of concepts), yet is densely populated by actors throughout — furthermore, he insists on asking what it is to be human and what it means to make claims on life and living today. Across numerous books, articles, and interventions, Rabinow’s efforts have remained inventive, unquiet, and experimental.

[…]
irst with Bennett and then with Stavrianakis, we worked together almost every day. This practice is accelerative and challenging. Its advantage is a flow of ideas and narration not interrupted by longer and shorter stretches of time with bureaucracy, irritations of the rampant pettiness and gossip that abounds, et cetera. The price to be paid aside from being neglected and even scorned was the risk of insularity. We hoped to counter that tendency by strong dialogue with thinkers such as Foucault, Dewey, Weber, Seneca, and Aristotle. One can easily imagine how this strategy was received in certain quarters — even philosophers complaining about the use of German and Greek terms!

Entretien inedit avec Michel Foucault (2014)

Clare O'Farrell

no comments

4 September 2015

Source: Assassines: Le Blog de Farès Sassine: Entretien inedit avec Michel Foucault 1979

Friday, 22 August 2014

Entretien inedit avec Michel Foucault 1979

Cet entretien d’août 1979 a longtemps été inédit en français. Il n’a été publié dans sa langue originelle qu’en 2013 dans la luxueuse revue annuelle lyonnaise Rodéo précédé et suivi d’un dossier bien fourni. Aujourd’hui en août 2014 il reparaît dans une nouvelle et belle traduction arabe due à Ahmad Beydoun dans la revue beyrouthine Kalamun.

Sur les circonstances de cet entretien, cf. notre article publié dans Rodéo 2013 et sur ce blog et intitulé « Foucault en l’entretien », août 2014.

FS : Si on parle de l’Iran : près de dix mois ont passé, n’est-ce pas, depuis votre première prise de position sur la révolution iranienne, prise de position qui a d’abord scandalisé et ensuite fortement marqué les milieux intellectuels français. Ces dix mois ont assisté au départ du souverain iranien et à la tentative des mollahs d’installer un gouvernement, possibilité que vous aviez évoquée et à laquelle vous aviez refusé de réduire le soulèvement iranien. Ailleurs dans le monde ce fut le soulèvement nicaraguayen, le drame des réfugiés indochinois… Il est peut-être temps d’évaluer rétrospectivement vos diverses prises de position à l’égard des questions iraniennes. Qu’est-ce qui vous a porté à vous intéresser à l’Iran ?

MF : Tout simplement la lecture d’un livre déjà ancien que je n’avais pas encore lu, et que, à la faveur d’un accident et d’une convalescence, j’ai eu le temps de lire avec soin l’été dernier et c’est le livre de Ernst Bloch Le Principe Espérance[1].

Ça m’a beaucoup frappé, parce que c’est un livre qui est finalement assez peu connu en France, a eu relativement peu d’influence, et qui me paraît poser un problème tout à fait capital. C’est-à-dire le problème de cette perception collective de l’Histoire, euh, qui commence à se faire jour en Europe au Moyen Age sans doute, et qui est la perception d’un autre monde ici-bas, la perception que la réalité des choses n’est pas définitivement instaurée et établie mais qu’il peut y avoir, à l’intérieur même de notre temps et de notre histoire, une ouverture, un point de lumière et d’attraction qui nous donne accès, dès ce monde-ci, à un monde meilleur.

Or cette perception de l’Histoire est à la fois un point de départ de l’idée même de Révolution et, d’autre part, une idée d’origine religieuse. Ce sont essentiellement des groupes religieux et surtout les groupes religieux dissidents qui, à la fin du Moyen Age et au début de la Renaissance, ont porté cette idée que, à l’intérieur même du monde d’ici-bas, quelque chose comme une Révolution était possible. Voilà. Alors, euh, ce thème m’a beaucoup intéressé car je le crois historiquement vrai, même si Ernst Bloch ne donne pas de tout cela une démonstration très satisfaisante en termes de science historique. Je crois que c’est une idée, qui est tout de même…

read more

Active Intolerance: Michel Foucault, the Prisons Information Group, and the Future of Abolition (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

2 comments

3 September 2015

Active Intolerance: Michel Foucault, the Prisons Information Group, and the Future of Abolition
Edited by Perry Zurn, Andrew Dilts
Palgrave Macmillan:November 2015

This book is an interdisciplinary collection of essays on Le Groupe d’information sur les prisons (The Prisons Information Group, the GIP). The GIP was a radical activist group, extant between 1970 and 1973, in which Michel Foucault was heavily involved. It aimed to facilitate the circulation of information about living conditions in French prisons and, over time, it catalyzed several revolts and instigated minor reforms. In Foucault’s words, the GIP sought to identify what was ‘intolerable’ about the prison system and then to produce ‘an active intolerance’ of that same intolerable reality. To do this, the GIP ‘gave prisoners the floor,’ so as to hear from prisoners themselves what to resist and how. The essays collected here explore the GIP’s resources both for Foucault studies and for prison activism today.

Michel Foucault, Language, Madness, and Desire. On Literature (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

1 comment

2 September 2015

Michel Foucault, Language, Madness, and Desire. On Literature, University of Minnesota Press, 2015
Edited by Philippe Artières, Jean-François Bert, Mathieu Potte-Bonneville, and Judith Revel
Translated by Robert Bononno

As a transformative thinker of the twentieth century, whose work spanned all branches of the humanities, Michel Foucault had a complex and profound relationship with literature. And yet this critical aspect of his thought, because it was largely expressed in speeches and interviews, remains virtually unknown to even his most loyal readers. This book brings together previously unpublished transcripts of oral presentations in which Foucault speaks at length about literature and its links to some of his principal themes: madness, language and criticism, and truth and desire.

The associations between madness and language—and madness and silence—preoccupy Foucault in two 1963 radio broadcasts, presented here, in which he ranges among literary examples from Cervantes and Shakespeare to Diderot before taking up questions about Artaud’s literary correspondence, lettres de cachet, and the materiality of language. In his lectures on the relations among language, the literary work, and literature, he discusses Joyce, Proust, Chateaubriand, Racine, and Corneille, as well as the linguist Roman Jakobson. What we know as literature, Foucault contends, begins with the Marquis de Sade, to whose writing—particularly La Nouvelle Justine and Juliette—he devotes a full two-part lecture series focusing on literary self-consciousness.

Following his meditations on history in the recently published Speech Begins after Death, this current volume makes clear the importance of literature to Foucault’s thought and intellectual development.

Contents

Editors’ Introduction
Note on the Text
Language, Madness, and Desire
Language and Madness
The Silence of the Mad
Mad Language
Literature and Language
Session 2: What Is Literature?
Session 2: What Is the Language of Literature?
Lectures on Sade
Session 1: Why Did Sade Write?
Session 2: Theoretical Discourses and Erotic Scenes
Editors’ Notes

Scott McLemee, The Afterlife of the Mind: Essay on Michel Foucault’s posthumous publications (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

no comments

1 September 2015

Scott McLemee, The Afterlife of the Mind. Essay on Michel Foucault’s posthumous publications
Inside Higher Ed, August 12, 2015

Franz Kafka left explicit directions concerning the journals, letters and manuscripts that would be found following his death: they were to be burned — all of them — unread. Whether he expected Max Brod, the executor of his estate, to follow through with his instructions is a matter of some debate. In any case, Brod refused, and the first volume of Kafka’s posthumous works came out shortly after the author’s death in 1925.

The disregard for his wishes can be explained, if not justified, on a couple of grounds. For one thing, Kafka was a lawyer, and he must have known that expressing his intentions in a couple of notes wouldn’t be binding — it takes a will to set forth a mandate in ironclad terms. And, too, Brod was both Kafka’s closest friend and the one person who recognized him as a writer of importance, even of genius. Expecting Brod not to preserve the manuscripts — much less to leave them unread! — hardly seems realistic.

On the other hand, Kafka himself destroyed most of his own manuscripts and did so in the same way he told Brod to do it, by setting them on fire. It is reasonable to suppose he meant what he said. If so, world literature has been enriched by an act of blatant disloyalty.

“Don’t pull the Max Brod trick on me,” Michel Foucault is said to have admonished friends. The philosopher and historian did Kafka one better by including a blunt, categorical line in his will: “No posthumous publications.” Be that as it may, in late spring the University of Minnesota Press issued Language, Madness, and Desire: On Literature, a volume of short texts by Foucault originally published in France two years ago and translated by Robert Bonnono. The same press and translator also turned the surviving pages of an autobiographical interview from 1968 into a little book with big margins called Speech Begins After Death. The title is kind of meta, since Foucault, like Kafka, seems to be having an unusually wordy afterlife.

read more

Sverre Raffnsøe, Marius Gudmand-Høyer, Morten S. Thaning, What is a dispositive? Foucault’s historical mappings of the networks of social reality (2014)

Clare O'Farrell

1 comment

31 August 2015

Sverre Raffnsøe, Marius Gudmand-Høyer, Morten S. Thaning, What is a dispositive? Foucault’s historical mappings of the networks of social reality. On Academia.edu.

Note
The present working paper represents an earlier version of our article “Foucault’s dispositive: The perspicacity of dispositive analytics in organizational research”, reviewed and published by Organization (Sept. 17, 2014; DOI: 10.1177/1350508414549885). We have chosen to distribute it since this paper, compared to the later, thoroughly revised article, presents more details pertaining to Foucault’s use of the dispositive as an analytical concept, as well as a number of the more general implications of this type of historico-philosophical social analytics.

Abstract
This article advances the ‘dispositive’ (le dispositif) as a key conception in Foucault’s work. As developed in his annual lectures in 1978 and 1979, the dispositive represents a crucial constituent of societal analysis on par with the familiar analytics of power/knowledge and the governmentality perspective – indeed it forms a lesser known intermediary between these. Foucault’s dispositional analysis articulates a history of connected social technologies that we have constructed to relate to each other. Expounding these points, the article distinguishes various dispositional prototypes and develops key ‘socio-ontological’ implications of the analysis. Reinstating the proper analytical status of the dispositive contributes to the reception of the important notion; the interpretation of Foucault’s entire oeuvre; and a resourceful approach to the study of contemporary societal problems.

Keywords
Michel Foucault, dispositive (dispositif), historico-philosophical social analytics, law, discipline, security, history of governmentality

Sports’ disciplinary legacy and the challenge of ‘coaching differently’ (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

1 comment

30 August 2015

Denison, J., Mills, J.P., Konoval, T.
Sports’ disciplinary legacy and the challenge of ‘coaching differently’
(2015) Sport, Education and Society, 12 p. Article in Press.

DOI: 10.1080/13573322.2015.1061986

Abstract
Be empowering. Be athlete-centered. Be autonomy supportive. These are three related topics currently being promoted by sport psychologists and sport pedagogists in an effort to recognize athletes’ unique qualities and developmental differences and make coaching more holistic and coaches more considerate. This has led us to ask, how likely are such initiatives to lead to coaches putting their athletes at the center of the coaching process given that coaches’ practices have largely been formed through relations of power that subordinate and objectify athletes’ bodies through the regular application of a range of disciplinary techniques and instruments [e.g. Barker-Ruchti, N., & Tinning, R. (2010). Foucault in leotards: Corporeal discipline in women’s artistic gymnastics. Sociology of Sport Journal, 27, 229–250; Heikkala, J. (1993). Discipline and excel: Techniques of the self and body and the logic of competing. Sociology of Sport Journal, 10, 397–412; Gearity, B., & Mills, J. P. (2012). Discipline and punish in the weight room. Sports Coaching Review, 1, 124–134]?

In other words, to try to develop athlete-centered coaches capable of coaching in ways that will empower their athletes without also problematizing the discursive formation of coaches’ practices concerns us [Denison, J., & Mills, J. P. (2014). Planning for distance running: Coaching with Foucault. Sports Coaching Review, 3, 1–16]. Put differently: how can athlete empowerment initiatives be anything more than rhetoric within a disciplinary framework that normalizes maximum coach control? It is this question that we intend to explore in this paper. More specifically, as Foucauldians, we will argue that coaching with greater consideration for athletes’ unique qualities and developmental differences needs to entail coaching in a less disciplinary way and with an awareness and appreciation of the many unseen effects that disciplinary power can have on coaches’ practices and athletes’ bodies. © 2015 Taylor & Francis

Author Keywords
athlete-centered; Coaching; disciplinary power; empowerment; foucault

Knowing Foucault, knowing you: ‘raced’/classed and gendered subjectivities in the pedagogical state (2015)

Clare O'Farrell

no comments

28 August 2015

Burman, E.
Knowing Foucault, knowing you: ‘raced’/classed and gendered subjectivities in the pedagogical state
(2015) Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 25 p. Article in Press.

DOI: 10.1080/14681366.2015.1057215

Abstract
This article evaluates the continuing contemporary relevance of Foucauldian analyses for critical educational and social research practice. Framed around examples drawn from everyday cultural and educational practices, I argue that current intensifications of psychologisation under neoliberal capitalism not only produce and constrain increasingly activated and responsibilised educational subjects but do so via engaging particular versions of feminisation and racialisation. Like Hacking’s ‘looping effect’, Foucauldian ideas may themselves now figure within prevailing technologies of subjectivity but this means we need more, as well as more than, Foucault. © 2015 Pedagogy, Culture & Society

Author Keywords
biopower; discourse; emotions; feminisation; pedagogy of affects