Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Carlson, David Lee, Rodriguez, Nelson M. (Eds.) Michel Foucault and Sexualities and Genders in Education. Friendship as Ascesis, Palgrave Macmillan, 2019

This book examines, within the context and concerns of education, Foucault’s reflections on friendship in his 1981 interview “Friendship as a Way of Life.” In the interview, Foucault advances the notion of a homosexual ascesis based on experimental friendships, proposing that homosexuality can provide the conditions for inventing new relational forms that can engender a homosexual culture and ethics, “a way of life,” not resembling institutionalized codes for relating. The contributors to this volume draw from Foucault’s reflections on ascesis and friendship in order to consider a range of topics and issues related to critical studies of sexualities and genders in education. Collectively, the chapters open a dialogue for researchers, scholars, and educators interested in exploring the importance and relevance of Foucault’s reflections on friendship for studies of schooling and education.

David Lee Carlson is Associate Professor of Qualitative Research in the Mary Lou Fulton Teachers College at Arizona State University, USA. His current research focuses on the ways in which the post-qualitative movement continues to problematize the onto-epistemology of research methodologies.

Nelson M. Rodriguez is Associate Professor of Women’s, Gender, and Sexuality Studies in the School of Humanities and Social Sciences at The College of New Jersey, USA. His current research areas span queer studies and education, critical masculinity studies, and Foucault studies.

Aldo Avellaneda y Guillermo Vega, (eds.) Conductas que importan. Variantes de análisis de los Estudios en Gubernamentalidad. EUDENE 2018.

Presentation: Wednesday, 27, 18:30. Salón de Actos, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Nacional del Nordeste, Argentina.

Resumen
Los así llamados Governmentality Studies (Estudios en Gubernamentalidad) vieron la luz en el año 1991, si convenimos en otorgar crédito suficiente a la designación que Colin Gordon, Graham Burchel y Peter Miller emplearon para denominar una compilación de artículos que se hacían eco, de una u otra manera, del concepto foucaulteano de gobierno. En efecto, en la clase del primero de febrero de 1978 dictada en el Collège de France, Foucault se había enfocado en las artes de gobierno como modo específico de articulación de las relaciones de poder y en la gubernamentalidad como grilla de inteligibilidad de las mismas, dando de esta manera un giro vertiginoso sobre las estrategias de análisis de los modos de pensar y programar el ejercicio del poder político

Contratapa
Entre 1978 y 1979, Foucault dicta dos cursos en el Collège de France, en los que pone de relieve los conceptos de «artes de gobierno» y de «gubernamentalidad» como herramientas de análisis de los modos en que se ejerce el poder político sobre la población. En los noventa, en Francia y en el mundo de habla inglesa, esta analítica dio origen a una serie de trabajos cuyas contribuciones conceptuales y metodológicas expandieron el campo de este nuevo enfoque. Desde entonces, los Estudios en Gubernamentalidad han alcanzado un profuso desarrollo fundamentalmente en el mundo anglosajón.
Este libro se propone hacer de los Governmentality Studies un objeto de interés, para reflexionar sobre sus posibilidades, virtudes y limitaciones. Es con este sentido que reúne una serie de trabajos de un grupo de investigadores pertenecientes a distintas universidades argentinas. Al mismo tiempo, aspira a poner en manos de los lectores de habla hispana artículos de algunos de los referentes extranjeros de esta línea de pensamiento, a la fecha, no traducidos al castellano. Finalmente, espera que la travesía de sus «territorios» −desde lo conceptual, pasando por los nuevos campos de abordaje, a lo operativo− problematice efectivamente los modos de pensar y comprender nuestras realidades.

Smaranda Spanu, Heterotopia and Heritage Preservation. The Heterotopic Tool as a Means of Heritage Assessment. Springer, 2020
This book approaches the field of built heritage and its practices by employing the concept of heterotopia, established by the French philosopher Michel Foucault. The fundamental understandings of heritage, its evolution and practices all reveal intrinsic heterotopic features (the mirror function, its utopic drive, and its enclave-like nature). The book draws on previous interpretations of heterotopia and argues for a reading of heritage as heterotopia, considering various heritage mechanisms – heritage selection, conservation and protection practices, and heritage as mnemonic device – in this regard. Reworking the six heterotopic principles, an analysis grid is designed and applied to various built heritage spaces (vernacular, religious architecture, urban 19th century ensembles). Guided through this theoretical itinerary, the reader will rediscover the heterotopic lens as a minor, yet promising, Foucauldian device that allows for a better understanding of heritage and its everyday practices.

Chris Methmann, “The Sky Is the Limit: Global Warming as Global Governmentality.” European Journal of International Relations 19, no. 1 (March 2013): 69–91.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066111415300

Open access

Abstract
The concept of governmentality has gained significant influence among scholars of International Relations. Recently, however, there is a growing literature engaging critically with the notion of a global governmentality. This article seeks to inform this debate with insights from global climate change politics as a paradigmatic case for applying governmentality to global politics. Drawing on an analysis of the Clean Development Mechanism, it makes three arguments, which seek to refine the global governmentality concept. First, governmentality does not necessarily centre on the notion of the ‘population’, but can also function as a governmentality of other ‘technological zones’. Second, the seeming failure of a governmentality in its own terms is better understood within a ‘post-foundational’ framework of depoliticization. Third, governmentality and sovereignty are not mutually exclusive. Instead, the former allows the latter to ‘govern at a distance’. The Clean Development Mechanism illustrates these points perfectly. Although it is based on a global ‘carbon governmentality’, it is able to conduct individual conduct directly. Its apparent failure in terms of carbon emission reductions is in fact a success of depoliticizing climate politics, excluding fundamental social structures. And although it is based on an international treaty, it establishes an advanced liberal government of the climate.

Keywords
Clean Development Mechanism, climate change, depoliticization, governmentality

Biagio Carrano, Balkanism, the European image of the Balkans, Serbian Monitor, 13/08/2019

An analysis of the Balkanist mentality, which, in a way, we all take with us when we think about the Balkans.

A premise that is almost a spoiler: if you want to read something lighter, go immediately to the related article dedicated to Balkanology. And if you really want to read this one too, then I must immediately abuse your patience by proposing the distinction between Balkan and Balkanology. (in order to make the article somewhat lighter, some explanatory notes are given at the end and indicated with a circle °)

Balkanism as a dispositif of power

The Balkans is inspired by Edward W. Said’s classic book “Orientalism”. In it the Arab-American scholar has shown how the political and academic “discourse” on a territory and its inhabitants is always inscribed in an asymmetrical power relationship between those who write, study, describe, represent and the subjects represented by these activities. So we had the construction of Western stereotypes about the East (especially, in Said’s book, about the Near East) that justified the colonialism and then the neocolonialism of the Western powers. In the wake of Said’s studies, the reference text about the Balkans is Maria Todorova’s “Imagining the Balkans“, in which the Bulgarian scholar reconstructs the Balkanism of the major European countries towards this part of the continent, that is, the representation of the Balkans as a primordial environment from the physical and ancestral point of view to the social one, economically backward, with people as victims and heritage of the Ottoman rule and therefore with cultures that tend to be different from those forged by Catholic Latinity and Central European Enlightenment.

As in the case of orientalism, Balkanism starts from the observation of the local economic backwardness to the point of attributing it even to a delay in the anthropological evolution of the inhabitants (Said, pg. 204).

read more

Erick Bengel, A One-Man Show Repackages Michel Foucault for the Age of Trump, November 11, 2019, Hyperallergic

This article is part of a series of pieces covering or inspired by the French Institute Alliance Française’s Crossing the Line festival, produced in collaboration with the Arts & Culture MA concentration at Columbia University’s Graduate School of Journalism.

Editor: Update 13 February 2026. Link above to Festival is the archived page on the Wayback Machine

[…]
This experimental effort — one of many events in French Institute Alliance Française’s Crossing the Line festival — ran two nights in mid-September at Cooper Union.

A one-man show, starring Guillaume Bailliart and staged in French, Disorder dramatizes an unrecorded but notable event in 20th century philosophy: Foucault’s delivering “The Order of Discourse” at the Collège de France, his inaugural lecture there, on December 2, 1970, in which he gives his longstanding focus on discourse a political spin by looking at the institutions that control it

Editor: Update 13 February 2026. Link in paragraph above to the archived page on the Wayback Machine

[…]

Editor: “la critique, ce sera l’art de l’inservitude volontaire, celui de l’indocilité réfléchie. La critique aurait essentiellement pour fonction le désassujetiissement dans le jeu de ce qu’on pourrait appeler, d’un mot. la politique de la vérité”
Michel Foucault, Qu’est-ce que la critique? Suivie de La culture de soi, Vrin, 2015, p.39

inservitude
dans le cadre de la saison culturelle Liberté ! Bordeaux 2019

du mercredi 19 juin au dimanche 26 janvier 2020
Arc en rêve centre d’architecture
Entrepôt
7 rue Ferrère
33000 Bordeaux

Et si l’architecture, discipline de la contrainte, ne cessait de s’inventer dans l’indiscipline des utopies créatrices, des auteurs et des usages ?
Entre l’avènement politique des Lumières et celui des totalitarismes du XXe siècle, où en sommes-nous dans l’art de l’inservitude volontaire, de l’indocilité réfléchie¹?
Le philosophe Guillaume le Blanc invite à ces questions.
inservitude les met en exposition avec la liberté en ligne de mire comme matériau essentiel de l’architecture, porteuse d’alternatives potentielles.

inservitude réunit une somme d’œuvres de référence internationale, comme autant d’expériences de la pensée et de la création architecturale qui expriment une vision du monde, en empruntant les chemins détournés qui vont à la rencontre des ailleurs, là où l’imprévu, la liberté et la beauté se retrouvent. Ces manières de faire, de dire, sont le fruit du travail d’architectes, urbanistes, paysagistes, ingénieurs, designers, géographes, philosophes, qui racontent ici et maintenant, une histoire du Monde.

[…]

Can architecture, a discipline defined by constraint, constantly reinvent itself via undisciplined creative utopias, architects, and modes of use? Between the political advent of the Enlightenment and that of 20th century totalitarianism, where do we stand in the art of “voluntary inservitude” and “reflexive indocility?¹?

The philosopher Guillaume le Blanc invites us to address these questions, and the exhibition inservitude explores the question of freedom as an essential raw material for architecture that offers potential alternatives.

inservitude brings together a selection of international projects in which thinking and architecture express an alternative vision of the world, treading unexplored paths that lead to places where the unexpected, freedom and beauty converge.

These ways of doing and saying things are the result of the work of architects, planners, landscape designers, geographers and philosophers who tell a story about the world, here and now.

Paul Horton, School bullying and bare life: Challenging the state of exception
EDUCATIONAL PHILOSOPHY AND THEORY, Volume: 51 Issue: 14, 2019, Pages: 1444-1453

https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2018.1557043

Despite a vast amount of research into school bullying and the widespread implementation of anti-bullying policies and programs, large numbers of students continue to report that they are routinely subjected to bullying by their peers. In this theoretical article, I argue that part of the problem is that there has been a lack of critical discussion of the theoretical foundations upon which such studies are based. Drawing on recent theoretical contributions within the field of school bullying, the work of anthropologist James C. Scott, and the work of philosophers Michel Foucault and Giorgio Agamben, I take particular issue with the notion of power that has long been a foundational pillar of bullying definitions. Utilizing a Foucauldian understanding of power, I argue that rather than focusing on the power imbalance involved in bullying relations, focus instead needs to shift onto the role that bullying plays in power relations. Reimagining Agamben’s figure of homo sacer as a victim of school bullying, I consider the ways in which some individuals are reduced to bare life and forced into a state of exception whereby social laws are no longer deemed applicable. The article concludes with a discussion of how this state of exception might be challenged.

Francisco Klauser, (2017) Surveillance and space, London: SAGE Publications Ltd

The digital age is also a surveillance age. Today, computerized systems protect and manage our everyday life; the increasing number of surveillance cameras in public places, the computerized loyalty systems of the retail sector, geo-localized smart-phone applications, or smart traffic and navigation systems. Surveillance is nothing fundamentally new, and yet more and more questions are being asked:

  • Who monitors whom, and how and why?
  • How do surveillance techniques affect socio-spatial practices and relationships?
  • How do they shape the fabrics of our cities, our mobilities, the spaces of the everyday?
  • And what are the implications in terms of border control and the exercise of political power?

Surveillance and Space responds to these modern questions by exploring the complex and varied interactions between surveillance and space.  In doing so, the book also advances a programmatic reflection on the very possibility of a ‘political geography of surveillance’.

Introduction: Governing the Everyday in the Digital Age
Part I: Conceptual foundations
Chapter 1: Surveillance and the Everyday
Chapter 2: Surveillance and Mediation
Chapter 3: Surveillance and Power
Chapter 4: Surveillance and Space

Part II: Spatial Logics of Surveillance
Chapter 5: Punctual, Linear and Planar Logics of Surveillance
Chapter 6: Surveillance relating to Fixity and Flexibility, Enclosure and Openness
Chapter 7: Spherical Attributes of Surveillance

Part III: The Functioning of Surveillance in its Relation to Space
Chapter 8: Surveillance, Authority and Expertise
Chapter 9: Policy Mobilities and Exemplification in Surveillance Matters

Part IV: The Socio-spatial Implications of Surveillance
Chapter 10: Spatial Distancing and Separation
Chapter 11: The Orchestration and Automatic Production of Space

Conclusion: Towards a Political Geography of Surveillance

de Bilbao Fabienne, « Le diagnostic comme symptôme », Cliniques méditerranéennes, 2019/2 (n° 100), p. 103-115.
DOI : 10.3917/cm.100.0103

La maladie d’Alzheimer est une maladie organique : tel est le dogme positiviste actuellement dominant. Cependant, le manque de fiabilité du diagnostic et les échecs répétés à trouver des traitements efficaces incitent à remettre en question l’hégémonie de ce dogme. Ceci est d’autant plus urgent qu’un dépistage de masse s’organise pour poser des diagnostics de plus en plus précocement. Ici, l’hypocrisie serait de se dire que c’est toujours pour le bien du patient qu’il est diagnostiqué. En accord avec la thèse foucaldienne sur la circularité propre au savoir et au pouvoir, le diagnostic, comme pratique discursive, constitue l’exercice d’un pouvoir qui produit des effets cliniques. Ces effets participent à la constitution d’un savoir qui renforce en retour ce pouvoir. Un discours qui créerait les conditions favorables à faire exister ce qu’il affirme. Sous couvert d’une rationalité emprunte de moralité, ce savoir-pouvoir, dont on devine l’impact mortifère, revêt des allures de sacrifice : celui du sujet inconscient. Il serait un partenaire actif du refoulement. C’est à ce titre que nous envisagerons l’acte diagnostic comme le symptôme du clinicien.