Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Paul Smeyers and Yusef Waghid, ‘Cosmopolitanism in Relation to the Self and the Other: From Michel Foucault to Stanley Cavell’, Educational Theory, Volume 60 Number 4 2010, pp. 449-467

Download pdf of article

Abstract
Educators, not to mention philosophers of education, find themselves in a difficult position nowadays. They are confronted with problems such as which kind of values one would want citizens to embrace, or to what extent social practices of a particular group may differ from what is generally held. In this essay, Paul Smeyers and Yusef Waghid focus on postmodern critiques, in particular on the position of Michel Foucault as it is relevant for the debate on cosmopolitanism. The authors argue that Foucault’s analysis of the self in relation to the other is somewhat contentious, as it seems to invoke an independent ethical self other than a social self. Smeyers and Waghid claim that a more nuanced position regarding this relation can be found in the work of Stanley Cavell. They conclude that encounters with the other should not be seen as a new kind of universalism or Foucauldian subjectivism, but rather as an opening that creates opportunities both for attachment and detachments, that is, for acknowledgment and avoidance.

James Wong, ‘Foucault and Autonomy’, ARSP. Archiv. für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie, vol. 96, no3, 2010, pp. 277-290.

Other details

Abstract
In this paper, I argue against Mark Bevir’s contention that Foucault is committed to reject autonomy but affirms agency. I argue that Bevir’s claim is extravagant, that (a) Foucault need not reject autonomy, and (b) the rejection of autonomy flies in the face of the emphasis Foucault placed on autonomy in his late work. Central to my argument is the distinction between autonomy as self-sufficiency and autonomy as self-rule. By deploying Harry Frankfurt’s structural account of identification, I show that Foucault’s discussion of autonomy in his late work is best understood as self-rule. Such an interpretation has the virtue of not adopting the counter-intuitive view that Foucault is committed to reject autonomy. By way of conclusion, I explore how such a concept of autonomy as self-rule figures in Foucault’s project of self-formation in his late work.

Letting Go of Neo-Liberalism (with some help from Michel Foucault)
Faculty seminar

Professor Terry Flew
Professor of Media and Communication,
Creative Industries Faculty,
Queensland University of Technology,
Brisbane, Australia

12pm-2pm Wednesday 24th November 2010
Z2-315 CI Precinct QUT Kelvin Grove

ABSTRACT

Neo-liberalism has become one of the boom concepts of our time. From its original reference point as a descriptor of the economics of the “Chicago School” such as Milton Friedman, or authors such as Friedrich von Hayek, neo-liberalism has become an all-purpose descriptor and explanatory device for phenomena as diverse as Bollywood weddings, standardized testing in schools, violence in Australian cinema, and the digitization of content in public libraries. Moreover, it has become an entirely pejorative term: no-one refers to their own views as “neo-liberal”, but it rather refers to the erroneous views held by others, whether they acknowledge this or not. Neo-liberalism as it has come to be used, then, bears many of the hallmarks of a dominant ideology theory in the classical Marxist sense, even if it is often not explored in these terms.

This presentation will take the opportunity provided by the English language publication of Michel Foucault’s 1978-79 lectures, under the title of The Birth of Biopolitics, to consider how he used the term neo-liberalism, and how this equates with its current uses in critical social and cultural theory. It will be argued that Foucault did not understand neo-liberalism as a dominant ideology in these lectures, but rather as marking a point of inflection in the historical evolution of liberal political philosophies of government. It will also be argued that his interpretation of neo-liberalism was more nuanced and more comparative than the more recent uses of Foucault in the literature on neo-liberalism. It will also look at how Foucault develops comparative historical models of liberal capitalism in The Birth of Biopolitics, arguing that this dimension of his work has been lost in more recent interpretations, which tend to retro-fit Foucault to contemporary critiques of either U.S. neo-conservatism or the “Third Way” of Tony Blair’s New Labour in the UK.

Biographical note

Terry Flew is Professor of Media and Communication in the Creative Industries Faculty, Queensland University of Technology (QUT). He is the author of New Media: An Introduction (OUP, 2008 – third edition) and Understanding Global Media (Palgrave, 2007). He has also been published in leading international academic journals such as International Journal of Cultural Policy, Television and New Media, Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism, Media, Culture and Society and International Journal of Cultural Studies. He has been First Chief Investigator on an ARC Linkages-Project into citizen journalism in Australia from 2006 to 2009, with industry partners including the Special Broadcasting Service, Cisco Systems Australia, and The National Forum. He is First Chief Investigator on an ARC Discovery-Project on Creative Suburbia, with researchers from QUT and Monash University. He is a Chief Investigator with the ARC Centre of Excellence for Creative Industries and Innovation, and was President of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association during 2009-2010. His forthcoming book is The Creative Industries, Culture and Policy (Sage, 2011).

Please RSVP to Kate Simmonds kate.simmonds@qut.edu.au by Monday 22nd November 2010

Foucault, Geuss and Political Philosophy
Speaker: Mark Kelly

Wednesday 24 November 2010
17:00 until 19:00
Fulton Building 107
University of Susses
UK

Part of the series: Social and Political Thought Research Seminars

Hayden White, the eminent historian who was amongst the first serious commentators in English on Foucault remarks on his blog:

A lot of people still seem to be disturbed by the idea that the language one uses to represent one’s thought or a world external to one’ self might have some effect on the content of what one says about either. Some seem to think that language could be a neutral “container” of a message rather than part of the “contained.” This fear or anxiety over what people call the “linguistic turn” (as if writing or speaking had not always been turned towards the linguistic) shows up among defenders of particular thinkers or pundits whose work has been submitted to linguistic-literary-rhetorical analysis by “eccentrics” like me who think that the “how” of expression is just as important for understanding an utterance as the “what” expressed.

Thus, my analysis of the philosophy of history informing Michel Foucault’s Les mots et les choses (English: The Order of Things) which is about nothing if it is not about discourse,in fact, is a discourse on discourse and discursivity, including the discourse of philosophy of history, this analysis is pilloried by a number of critics because it seems to be based on belief in a kind of linguistic determinism which pre-determines both the “content” of Foucault’s work and its “form” of expression.

See Hayden White’s blog for the rest of the post

From the Portail Michel Foucault

Forum Internacional de Estudos Foucauldianos O cristianismo em Michel Foucault
25/11/10 – 26/11/10

UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE SANTA CATARINA Centro de Comunicação e Expressão
Auditório Henrique Fontes

O objetivo do evento é examinar de que maneira e de que cristianismo trata Michel Foucault, desde a publicação dos três volumes de História da Sexualidade até os três últimos cursos O Governo dos vivos (1980–1981), Hermenêutica do Sujeito (1981-1982), Governo de si e dos outros (1982-1983) e A coragem da Verdade (1984). Vamos reunir pesquisadores que operam diretamente nos arquivos foucauldianos para expor novas maneiras de pensar, investigar e escrever, no âmbito enunciativo do atelier foucauldiano. A pergunta básica do Forum é: como Foucault mobiliza, lê e traduz obras clássicas da antiguidade grega e da patrística para lançar hipóteses sobre a força ainda vigente do cristianismo em processos contemporâneos de subjetivação.

O evento é uma realização dos programas de Pós-Graduação em Literatura e Pós-Graduação em Estudos da Tradução. Terá a participação de convidados estrangeiros e nacionais. Já confirmados estão os pesquisadores:

* Philippe Chevallier, da Biblioteca Nacional da França e membro fundador da Biblioteca Foucauldiana * Anthony Manicki, da École Normale Supérieure de Lyon * Cesar Candiotto, da Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná * Durval Albuquerque, da Universidade Federal de Rio Grande do Norte * Emerson César de Campos, da Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina * Kleber Prado, da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina.

* A comissão executiva: Pedro de Souza, Stelio Furlan e Walter Costa. * A comissão organizadora: Pedro de Souza, Mario Resende e Nara Marques

Além das conferências magnas e mesas-redondas, haverá espaço para exposição de trabalhos em duas sessões coordenadas.

Os trabalhos deverão ter alguma relação com o tema geral do Forum ou versar sobre temas de um dos três últimos cursos ministrados por Michel Foucault no Collège de France.

O resumo deverá:

•ser enviado até 30 de outubro de 2010 para o email:
forumfoucault.ufsc@yahoo.com.br

•ter no máximo 200 palavras.
•vir acompanhado de:
1. Título do trabalho; 2. Nome completo do autor(es); 3. Telefone e email; 4. Breve currículo.

As comunicações não deverão exceder os 20.000 caracteres (com espaços), e o tempo de leitura não deverá exceder os 15 minutos.

Somente serão lidas as comunicações selecionadas e cujos autores estejam presentes durante Forum.

Não haverá taxa de inscrição para apresentação de comunicações.

Maiores informações: forumfoucault.ufsc@yahoo.com.br ou pedesou@gmail.com

From the Portail Michel Foucault

Congreso “Michel Foucault un pensador poliédrico”
en el MUVIM de Valencia.
El 15, 16 y 17 de noviembre.
MuVim, Museu Valencià de la Il.lustració i de la Modernitat.
Calle Quevedo, 10 – 46001 València. Tel.:963 883 730. Más inf.: http://www.muvim.es

Michel Foucault un pensador poliédrico. Su pensamiento no es un pensamiento lineal, sino un pensamiento reticular, multidisciplinario, imprevisible… es, al fin y al cabo, un pensamiento que dispersa lo reunido y que reúne lo disperso.

Su filosofía, resultado del cruzamiento de varios intereses, campos de trabajo y etapas, es una filosofía hecha a martillazos a partir del uso de materiales filosóficamente atípicos e innobles. Eso hace que sea posible -y obligado- realizar múltiples lecturas poliédricas de los textos de este experimentador: “Yo soy experimentador en el sentido de que yo escribo por cambiarme a mí mismo y no pensar más la misma cosa que antes”

Director académico: Josep Bermúdez

The October issue of Law Cultiure and the Humanities contains a number of articles and a book review which relate to Foucault’s work. You can find the abstracts and pdfs (subscription only) on the journal site. The articles in question are:

Jonathan Simon, ‘Beyond the Panopticon: Mass Imprisonment and the Humanities’, Law, Culture and the Humanities, October 2010 6: 327-340.

Abstract
In the 1970s and the 1980s, the role of the prison in modern society was seared into the imagination of the humanities by Michel Foucault’s treatment of the prison in Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison; his genealogy of the modern “soul.” At a time when the social sciences had little to say about the nature of imprisonment as a specific historical practice (rather than a problem of social organization), the humanities helped define the prison as a contemporary problem. During this era, ironically, a new model of imprisonment was arising, one based on the mass imprisonment of whole demographic categories of the population rather than the disciplinary investment of the deviant individual. The scale of imprisonment has arisen by more than five fold. Unfortunately the humanities and cultural studies have been slow to reckon with the nature of mass imprisonment. While a new wave of social science scholarship, partially inspired by the earlier work of the humanities, is engaging the topic, the absence of the humanities, especially their critical and normative edge, is significant.

Keally McBride, ‘Incarceration and Imprisonment’,
Law, Culture and the Humanities, October 2010 6: 341-353.

Abstract
Incarceration is best understood as an extreme environment which complicates our notions of human freedom. Incarceration helps us think about freedom because it demands consideration of the relationship between body and soul, providing yet another testing ground for the longstanding metaphysical and philosophical question of what makes humans truly free. It also is a remarkable test case for how much of human experience is socially determined and how much individuals can create their own reality because prisons try to substitute external administration for self-discipline entirely. How can we account for resistance to these forms of administration?

Ben Golder, ‘Foucault and the Unfinished Human of Rights’, Law, Culture and the Humanities, October 2010 6: 354-374.

Abstract
This article argues that in his late work Foucault does not submit to the ”moral superiority” of humanism and introduce a liberal humanist subject. Rather, Foucault’s late investigations of subjectivity constitute a continuation and not a radical departure from his earlier positions on the subject. This helps us in interpreting Foucault’s late supposed ”embrace” of, or return to -human rights; which is here re-interpreted as a critical anti-humanist engagement with human rights, conducted in the name of an unfinished humanity.

Manas Ray, ‘Book Review: Foucault’s Law By Ben Golder and Peter Fitzpatrick, London: Routledge-Cavendish, 2009. 160 pp. $35.95 (Paper). ISBN 0415424542
Law, Culture and the Humanities October 2010 6: 465-469.

From the Portail Michel Foucault

FOUCAULT-MARX PARALLELI E PARADOSSI
Libreria delle Moline Via delle Moline,
3/A 40126 Bologna tel. : 051 23 20 53 Buongiorno,
VENERDI, 12 NOVEMBRE 2010
E’, questo, l’invito per il prossimo incontro in libreria. Presentiamo il libro :

FOUCAULT-MARX PARALLELI E PARADOSSI
a cura di Rudy M. Leonelli
Bulzoni editore

Ne parlano : Andrea Cavalletti Università IUAV di Venezia Manlio Iofrida Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università di Bologna Giuseppe Panella Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa Rudy M. Leonelli Dipartimento di Filosofia, Università di Bologna

Qui si tratta del buon uso che riusciamo a fare di quanto è contenuto nelle riflessioni di Foucault, Marx, Gramsci, sulla natura ambigua e contraddittoria del potere , che è contemporaneamente sia dominio, sia egemonia, attraversando il pensiero politico della modernità, ma anche del rapporto stretto tra cultura e democrazia , dell’intreccio tra potere e sapere, che ha percorso in molteplici direzioni la profonda riflessione del nostro tempo nei testi di suoi protagonisti, quali Nietzsche, Heidegger, Freud, Breton, Sartre, Blanchot, Canguilhem, per esempio, ma anche il poeta René Char, dell’ immaginazione , del pensiero , del possibile.

Da interventi presentati e discussi all’incontro : – Foucault, Marx, marxismi – organizzato dal Dipartimento di Filosofia dell’università di Bologna presso laScuolaSuperiore di Studi Umanistici il volume raccoglie sei saggi :

Alberto Burgio, La passione per la critica.
Stefano Catucci, Essere giusti con Marx.
Guglielmo Forni Rosa, Note sul rapporto Foucault-Marx. A proposito di”Difendere la società”.
Marco Enrico Giacomelli, Ascendenze e discendenze foucaultiane in Italia. Dall’operaismo italiano al futuro.
Manlio Iofrida, Marxismo e comunismo in Francia negli anni ’50. Qualche appunto sul primo Foucault.
Rudy M. Leonelli, L’arma del sapere.Storia e potere tra Foucault e Marx.

Il volume è arricchito da un contributo di Etienne Balibar.

ESRC Seminar Series on Contemporary Biopolitical Security Fourth workshop:

Problematising Danger

Co-sponsored by the Biopolitics of Security Network,
the Emerging Securities Research Unit @ Keele University
and the Centre for International Relations, War Studies Department, King’s
College London

21-22 February 2011
The River Room, King’s College London, Strand Campus

Keynote speaker:
Professor Marieke de Goede
Professor of Politics, with a focus on Europe in a Global Order, at the Department of Politics of the University of Amsterdam

Call for interventions
‘There is no liberalism without a culture of danger.’ (Foucault, 2008: 67)

FOUCAULT, M. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: lectures at the College de France, 1978-1979,Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan.

Threats and risks have become the preferred categories for imagining contemporary security. Practices such as defence, border control and the surveillance of populations, insurance, risk profiling to identify suspicious subjects, and risk assessments to protect objects and systems such as critical infrastructure, rely heavily on well-established paradigms of security. Discourses and practices of threats and risks, with their allied technologies of measurement and calculation, however, relate to the wider problem of danger and its allied concept of ‘uncertainty’. Thinking ‘danger’ relates to understandings of uncertainties, otherness of being, and spaces and environments of protection in excess of those accounted for in the language and metrics of discourses of threats and risks.

What happens, then, if the analysis of security resorts to understandings of ‘danger’, ‘dangerousness’, and processes of ‘endangerment’? Is it possible to think security by referring ideas of danger to understandings of life, livelihoods and lifestyles, instead of ready-made ‘objects’ of security such as sovereignty, territory, the nation-state, citizens, borders, and sociological categories such as class and gender? Is it possible to think security in relation to danger away from utilitarian economic categories such as cost-benefit analysis, risk calculus, and rational choice? The workshop aims to explore these questions and to challenge participants to wonder if current policy security priorities such as terrorism, climate change, weapons proliferation, resilience and migration can be thought in relation to ‘danger’ outside discourses of threats and risks.

In the first three workshops of this seminar series we began to explore an agenda for contemporary biopolitical security research around problems such as mobilities and circulations, resilience, values and processes of valuations in relation to the technologies through which lifestyles and livelihoods are treated as referents of security. In this fourth workshop we intend to spark a conversation around the implications of thinking dangerousness in relation to security and life.

The workshop welcomes interventions from scholars working on any area of security and risk and invites them to reflect on the following questions:

* How are ideas of danger constituted? What forms of ‘data’, ‘information’, and ‘knowledge’ are involved in constituting a dangerous subject or a dangerous environment?
* What are the preconditions for understanding endangerment and how do they question the ‘new security challenges’ of for example, terrorism (and cyber-terrorism), proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, climate change, and health pandemics?
* Can discourses and practices of security be different if reflections on the consequences of endangerment are advanced?

Interventions do not necessarily need to be in the form of a pre-written paper although we would welcome written contributions. We invite emerging and established researchers on the wider field of security studies to reflect on their own work based on the questions noted above. PhD contributions are very welcome.

Please send a 200-300 word abstract of your proposed intervention for the debate to our workshop coordinators (noted below) no later than the 30th of November 2010.

Please include your affiliation and contact details in the abstract. Acceptance of contributions will be confirmed by email on the week commencing the 6th of December.

Funding: Travel and accommodation expenses will be covered for contributors and a limited number of participants based in the UK (according to ESRC rules). If you are a PhD student and want to participate without an intervention, please express your interest to the workshop coordinators as early as possible. Some funds might be available to facilitate your attendance.

Workshop coordinators:
Philip Slann (p.a.slann@ilpj.keele.ac.uk)
Corey Walker-Mortimer (c.b.walker-mortimer@ilpj.keele.ac.uk )

Event organisers:
Dr Luis Lobo-Guerrero (Visiting Research Fellow, King’s College London; and
Lecturer in International Relations, Keele University), and Professor

Vivienne Jabri (Professor of International Politics and Director of the
Centre for International Relations at King’s College London)