Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Call for papers for a special issue “Mise-en-Scene: Crime”

Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies
Vol. 38 No. 1 (March 2012)

Submissions due August 15, 2011

********
In the beginning was murder. Then came drama: the hair-tearing (or eye-gouging) discovery of one’s own overweening hubris, the inconsolable grieving over the loss of the most basic sense of humanity, and, simply, more killing. Indeed, murderers are significant figures in what Erich Auerbach would call “scenes of drama from European literature”: Cain, Oedipus, Medea, the parricides in Dante’s inferno, and Shakespeare’s army of villains. Acts of killing in these literary texts not only contribute to the excitement of the drama, but also make imperative a rethinking of social order, justice, morality, state power, and human-God relations.

Philosophers have also long relied on scenes of crime to ground their reflections on humanity. René Girard believes that sacrifice was needed for the release of pent-up social violence. Georges Bataille sees community as “founded in the act of killing, in the rupturing of separate existence” (Fred Botting & Scott Wilson). Hegel, Jacques Lacan, and Judith Butler ponder the limit of norms and the viability of ethical claims through the figure of Antigone. Giorgio Agamben posits the figure of the homo sacer (he “who may be killed and yet not sacrificed”) to illustrate the threshold being qua bare life; Agamben even goes so far as to read the concentration camp, an extreme instance of political crime, as the paradigm of modern biopolitics. And for Michel Foucault, the Panopticon prison system symbolizes a new dimension in the modern modality of power, whereas the mass murder committed by the young peasant Pierre Rivière in 1835 helps to elucidate the way in which various modern discursive fields such as the medical, juridical, and historiographical intersected with and confronted one another.

Crime scenes continue to figure prominently in our time, oftentimes in a larger-than-life fashion. The Guantanamo Bay detention and torture of war prisoners exemplifies a sovereignty unbound by law, making one wonder if, in the wake of the 9/11 incident, we must always think of crime in the context of globalization and vice versa. In pop culture, cannibalistic serial killers are ranked among the most fascinating, if not also the smartest, filmic characters. Prime-time crime scene investigation drama series are introducing a new truth regime grounded in forensic science and criminal psychology, to the effect of drastically changing the way we think about human conduct and causality. And the virtual world of online games is to a great extent built on the participant’s imaginary enactment of the role of the criminal and/or crime buster.

For this special issue of Concentric, we invite submissions that investigate the “crime scene” in theoretical discourses. For instance, how are the following issues dealt with in different theorists, by way of the figure of crime—limit, transgression, power, knowledge, life, and ethics? On the stage of today’s worldwide power struggle, is “crime” being redefined thanks to the rise of an inescapably interconnected globe?

We also welcome works that research the genres of crime fiction, crime film, and crime drama in a refreshing light. For example, is the bespectacled detective giving way to the white-robed forensic scientist as the new hero of the social order? Can we read the boom in stories of crime scene investigation and criminal profiling as an indicator of a rational turn in our time? Why is the corpse of the victim increasingly being presented as a familiar, approachable object in these TV and filmic dramas? What kind of repetition compulsion may be at play in the reception of these genres?

Any discussions of the “scene of the crime” in relation to literary, dramatic or cinematic works—including their characters, plots, images, symbols, and ideas—will also be welcome.

********
Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies is a peer-reviewed journal published biannually by the Department of English, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan. The journal is devoted to offering innovative perspectives on literary and cultural issues and advancing the transcultural exchange of ideas. While committed to bringing Asian-based scholarship to the world academic community, Concentric welcomes original contributions from diverse national and cultural backgrounds.

Concentric engages in intellectual discussion by mounting themed issues. Each issue is also open for papers on general topics. The focus can be on any historical period and any region. Any critical method may be employed as long as the paper demonstrates a distinctive contribution to scholarship in the field.

Concentric boasts a strong editorial and advisory team composed of respected scholars from across the world. The journal has also collaborated with distinguished international scholars as guest editors, such as Wlad Godzich, María Herrera-Sobek, Shirley Geok-lin Lim, Charles Shepherdson, Scott Slovic, and Ban Wang. Past and future contributors include Ronald Lynn Bogue, Vilashini Cooppan, Sneja Gunew, Carl Gutiérrez-Jones, Haiyan Lee, Leo Lefebure, Deborah L. Madsen, Steven Shaviro, Hugh J. Silverman, Frank Webster, Rob Wilson, Gang Gary Xu, and Yingjin Zhang.

********
Manuscript Submission Guidelines

1. Manuscripts should be submitted in English. Please send the manuscript, an abstract of no more than 250 words with 5-8 keywords, and a brief curriculum vitae as Word attachments to . Please also attach a cover letter stating that the manuscript is not currently being considered for publication elsewhere. Concentric will acknowledge receipt of the submission but will not return it after review.

2. Submissions made to the journal should generally be at least 6,000 words but should not exceed 10,000 words, notes included; the bibliography is not counted. Manuscripts should be prepared according to the latest edition of the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. Except for footnotes, which should be single-spaced, manuscripts must be double-spaced throughout and typeset in 12-point Times New Roman.

3. To facilitate the journal’s anonymous refereeing process, there must be no indication of personal identity or institutional affiliation in the manuscript proper. The author may cite his/her previous works, but only in the third person.

4. If the paper has been published or submitted elsewhere in a language other than English, please also submit a copy of the non-English version. Concentric may not consider submissions already available in other languages.

5. If the author wishes to include copyrighted images in the essay, the author is solely responsible for obtaining permission for the images.

6. Two copies of the journal and a PDF version of the published essay will be provided to the author(s) upon publication. (Authors who submitted their papers in response to the earlier call for papers of issue 38.1 may opt for the previous offer of one copy of the journal and fifteen off-prints of their essay.)

7. It is the journal’s policy to require all authors to sign an assignment of copyright.
Editor, Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies
Department of English
National Taiwan Normal University
162 Heping East Road, Section 1
Taipei 106
Taiwan
Email: concentric.lit@deps.ntnu.edu.tw

David Galston, Archives and the Event of God: The Impact of Michel Foucault on Philosophical Theology (Ithaca: McGill-Queen’s Univ. Press, 2011).

Review

Description
The philosophical works of Michel Foucault have profoundly influenced many disciplines, but his influence on theology has seldom been considered. Archives and the Event of God unravels the effects that Foucault’s Archaeology of Knowledge and Discipline and Punish have had on the study of theology and religion. Beginning with a study of the concept of archaeology, the meaning of the statement, and the understanding of an epistemic event, David Galston provides a novel synthesis of Foucault’s work on genealogy and the ways in which the statement can be united with power and productivity in the archive. Arguing that archaeology and genealogy give rise to two new theologies, Galston develops concepts that enable us to critique theology, religion, and God as archive events that can be accounted for in the operations of power and resolution to statements. A unique and new agenda in the philosophy of religion, Archives and the Event of God is an insightful and sophisticated study that outlines novel ways to think of religion in the postmodern era.

About the Author
David Galston is the co-founder and past-president of The SnowStar Institute of Religion and is currently its academic adviser and an editor of its magazine, AXIAL. He has a PhD from McGill University, where he was formerly university chaplain.

First two-day workshop of the CIBB Project (‘Contemporary Issues in Bioethics and Biopolitics’)

‘The Normal and the Pathological’

27th and 28th September 2011
MS.05 (second floor) Zeeman Building, The University of Warwick.

Please note that all the papers will be delivered in English.

All welcome. Free registration at normalpathological@gmail.com

Confirmed speakers: Jean-Claude Dumoncel, Robert Bernasconi, Bill Fulford, Frederic Worms, Julien Pieron, Florence Caeymaex, Guillaume Leblanc, John Protevi, Charles T.Wolfe and Giuseppe Bianco

From a philosophical perspective, the problem of illness can be seen to emerge from the tension between the subjective (a life which is mine) and objective dimensions of life. On the one hand, illness is irreducible to an objective fact, as if independent of the subjectivity which it affects; on the other hand, it is irreducible to a mere signification, and cannot be understood independently of its inscription within a living organism, its relation to an environment, and even the effort, on the part of other living beings, to know and treat it. Illness is a qualitative and individual experience that takes place within human life itself. Once we recognise the specificity of illness in those terms, can we not arrive at an understanding of life, and the normal, on the basis of the pathological, and not as what is simply threatened and, ultimately, annihilated by it? Similarly, should medicine not recognize in care (and its latin etymology cura) the ethical implications of the internal tension of life and not isolate the pathology from the subjectivity in which it is rooted?

Far from being of interest only to biology and medicine, the question of the normal and the pathological implicates our perception of life as a whole, in all its forms. Pathology is at the source of all questioning concerned with life. It’s only on the basis of suffering and distress, which are the signs of illness, that every question regarding life, or what living human beings consider normal at a given stage of their history, and the conditions under which such a state can be maintained, becomes possible. “Health is life in the silence of the organs,” wrote Leriche. This means that all discourse of life on life spring from that obscure moment when, confronted with an obstacle, life “speaks” or seeks to speak. To the extent that our purpose is to ask about life, we need to begin by asking about life’s relation to the pathological, and the epistemological, ethical and political implications of such a relation.

After the classical contributions of Canguilhem and Foucault, we are convinced that it is possible, and indeed necessary, to extend and adapt the reflection of the philosophy of pathology in the light of the new challenges emerging from the evolution of society and the life sciences. In the era of bio-power, the norms have become independent of the normative power of the human being, determining its comportments and excluding those considered pathological. To what extent is it possible to emphasise and promote the normative activity of human life in the face of a system that declares in advance, and down to the most minute details, what is normal? What paradigm of normality and health can we develop as an alternative to auto-immunisation, this disease caused by the excess of concern for health? What critical space is left, or can be generated, in an epoch in which the life sciences make it possible for the human being to intervene on itself, on other living beings, and determine their identity? Is it still possible to develop a normative critique that would not be rooted in the naturalistic paradigm?

Michel Foucault The Courage of Truth, Series: Michel Foucault: Lectures at the Collège de France, Palgrave Macmillan, 2011

The course given by Michel Foucault from February to March 1984, under the title The Courage of Truth, was his last at the Collège de France. His death shortly after, on June 25th, tempts us to detect a philosophical testament in these lectures, especially in view of the prominence they give to the theme of death, notably through a reinterpretation of Socrates’ last words–’Crito, we owe a cock to Asclepius’– which, with Georges Dumézil, Foucault understands as the expression of a profound gratitude towards philosophy for its cure of the only serious illness: that of false opinions and prejudices. These lectures continue and radicalize the analyses of those of the previous year. Foucault’s 1983 lectures investigated the function of ‘truth telling’ in politics in order to establish courage and conviction as ethical conditions for democracy irreducible to the formal rules of consensus. With the Cynics, this manifestation of the truth no longer appears simply as a risky speaking out, but in the very substance of existence. In fact, Foucault offers an incisive study of ancient Cynicism as practical philosophy, athleticism of the truth, public provocation, and ascetic sovereignty. The scandal of the true life is constructed in opposition to Platonism and its world of transcendent intelligible Forms.

‘There is no establishment of the truth without an essential position of otherness. The truth is never the same. There can be truth only in the form of the other world and the other life.’

Géraldine Brausch, «Un détour par les stratèges de Jullien pour relire les analyses stratégiques de Foucault», Dissensus, N° 4 (avril 2011)

Table des matières
I. Nécessité d’une hétérotopie
II. Contre le modèle du droit, le modèle stratégique
III. La logique disciplinaire ou l’art de faire table rase du réel pour mieux le (re)créer. Retour sur la matrice militaire
IV. Une stratégie sans général, certes, mais pas sans modèle
V. Grippage, ratage, friction : la logique disciplinaire à l’épreuve de l’analyse stratégique
VI. Le dispositif de sécurité : gouverner non pas le réel mais « à partir du réel »57. Vers l’« efficience » chinoise
VII. Conclusion

Michael Power, Foucault and Sociology, Annual Review of Sociology, Volume 37 July 07, 2011
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-081309-150133

ABSTRACT
Michel Foucault was a gifted but elusive thinker with a wide and continuing impact across many academic fields. This article positions his work as a historical sociology of knowledge and evaluates its contribution. After reviewing Foucault’s central preoccupations as they emerge in his major works, the argument briefly considers their influence on accounting scholarship as an informative exemplar of a wider Foucault effect. Four key areas for the sociological reception of Foucault are then considered: the nature of discourse and archaeology, his historical method, the problem of agency and action, and his conception of power. Articulating Foucault’s relationship to sociology is inherently problematic, not least because he takes the emergence of the sciences of man as something to be explained rather than augmented. Yet his work remains a rich resource for inquiries of the sociological type, is broadly aligned with a practice turn in social theory, and intersects with several themes in both mainstream and critical sociology.

Michael Power
Department of Accounting, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A2AE, United Kingdom; email: m.k.power@lse.ac.uk

Radu, Carmen. 2011. “Governmentality and the Deportation of Eastern European Roma in Italy and France.” Student Pulse Academic Journal 3.04.

Read online

Abstract
This case study asks the following question: given the symbol of the European Union as the ultimate supranational, rights-based, compliance-inducing international organization, why have member states France and Italy escaped punishment for their blatant violations of international law, reflected in their mass deportations of Roma and the dismantlement of Roma camps during the period of 2008 to 2010? Inspired by a Foucauldian theoretical framework, this paper analyzes how discourses and practices reveal power relationships at the EU and state levels, and argues that the mass deportations are a site of governing and biopower as defined by Foucault. The main theoretical Foucauldian tools used are governmentality, discourse, biopower, the archaeology of knowledge, and the genealogy of practice. Given that this case study analyzes factors that lie both inside and outside the state, the paper draw upon scholars who explain why governmentality is relevant to the study of international politics. Finally, because of the dire poverty in which Roma live, governmentality studies are used to highlight the government of poverty, and show how the government of poverty today entails the criminalization of the poor.

The main contention is that the discourses and practices surrounding the 2008-2010 Roma deportations reveal a power struggle between the EU’s governing of France and Italy, and France and Italy’s governing of the Roma. This power struggle allows us to understand why France and Italy were able to evade punitive measures. Because of its lack of power of norm formation in the socioeconomic rights sphere, EU discourse reveals that the EU understands the Roma situation within the context of ethnic discrimination. By governing the Roma within the context of poverty as a social danger, France and Italy escaped punitive measures because the EU has been weak in alternatively shaping the government of poverty. The Eastern European Roma remain caught in intersecting persecutions due to their status as both ethnically different and poor.

Strausz, Erzsébet, ‘Foucault’s Critique: A Topology of Thought’, Law and Critique, March 2011, 1-15
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-011-9082-5

Abstract
In order to elucidate some of the ways in which critique and subjectivity become inextricably linked in Foucault’s oeuvre, the paper proceeds first by briefly discussing the concept of critique as limit-attitude as it appears in some of Foucault’s methodological writings. Subsequently, the main tenets of Judith Butler’s commentary on the essay ‘What is Critique?’ will be summarized, concentrating on the image of the virtuous, self-making subject that the author’s interpretation brings out of Foucault’s original text. The second part of the paper aims to develop an alternative reading of Foucault’s notion of critique by looking at the ways in which the notion of space operates as an underlying perspective in his archaeological analysis. Ultimately, it will be shown how the spatial implications of Foucault’s early works and a more passive form of subjectivity as unfolding from his discussion of the ‘author function’ and his own methodological reflections coalesce into a form of practical critique, which, as wished by the author, may take ‘the form of a possible transgression’ (Foucault 1984a, p. 45).

Saul Newman, ‘Postanarchism and Power’, Journal of Power, Vol. 3, No. 2, August 2010, 259–274
https://doi.org/10.1080/17540291.2010.493704

Abstract
This article develops a postanarchist conception of power by using Foucault to reveal some of the tensions and limitations within classical anarchist theory. As a Foucauldian poststructuralist analysis shows, the operation of power is more complex and constitutive than was allowed in classical anarchist theory, which tended to focus on state sovereignty. The revealing of the pervasiveness of power makes problematic any sort of ontological separation between society and power. However, rather than this insight undermining the possibility of anarchism – a form of radical politics that I argue is becoming more relevant today – it necessitates a certain modification of classical anarchism into postanarchism. Postanarchism might be seen as a new way of thinking about a politics of autonomy based on practices of freedom.

Anders Fogh Jensen and Rasmus Svarre Hansen, Cartographier le pouvoir: Foucault et Bourdieu

Cartographier le pouvoir est un livre illustré qui tente de reformuler les théories de Foucault et de Bourdieu dans une langue simple et au moyen de dessins expressifs.

The Cartography of Power is a picture book which recounts Foucault and Bourdieu’s theories in a simple language supported by inspired drawings. Anders Fogh Jensen’s imaginative expressions is accompanied by Rasmus Svarre Hansen’s expressive images, and together they have created an original guide which takes the reader by the hand and leads her through a great diversity of ideas across a broad range of subjects.