Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Alvaro Sevilla-Buitrago, Territory and the governmentalisation of social reproduction: Parliamentary enclosure and spatial rationalities in the transition from feudalism to capitalism, Journal of Historical Geography, Volume 38, Issue 3, July 2012, Pages 209-219
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2012.02.002

Abstract
Recent applications of Foucauldian categories in geography, spatial history and the history of town planning have opened up interesting new perspectives, with respect to both the evolution of spatial knowledge and the genealogy of territorial techniques and their relation to larger socio-political projects, that would be enriched if combined with other discursive traditions. This article proposes to conceptualise English parliamentary enclosure-a favourite episode for Marxist historiography, frequently read in a strictly materialist fashion-as a precedent of a new form of sociospatial governmentality, a political technology that inaugurates a strategic manipulation of territory for social change on the threshold between feudal and capitalist spatial rationalities. I analyse the sociospatial dimensions of parliamentary enclosure’s technical and legal innovations and compare them to the forms of communal self-regulation of land use customs and everyday regionalisations that preceded it. Through a systematic, replicable mechanism of reterritorialisation, enclosure acts normalised spatial regulations, blurred regional differences in the social organisation of agriculture and erased the modes of autonomous social reproduction linked to common land. Their exercise of dispossession of material resources, social capital and community representations is interpreted therefore as an inaugural logic that would pervade the emergent spatial rationality later known as planning.

Author keywords
Commons; Michel Foucault; Parliamentary enclosure; Planning history; Spatial governmentality; Territoriality

Gordon Tait, Clare O’Farrell, Sarah Davey Chesters, Joanne Brownlee, Rebecca Spooner-Lane, “Are There Any Right or Wrong Answers in Teaching Philosophy?: Ethics, Epistemology, and Philosophy in the Classroom” Teaching Philosophy, 35 (4), pp.367-381
https://doi.org/10.5840/teachphil201235442

Abstract
This article assesses undergraduate teaching students’ assertion that there are no right and wrong answers in teaching philosophy. When asked questions about their experiences of philosophy in the classroom for primary children, their unanimous declaration that teaching philosophy has ‘no right and wrong answers’ is critically examined across the three sub-disciplinary areas to which they were generally referring, namely, pedagogy, ethics, and epistemology. From a pedagogical point of view, it is argued that some teach­ing approaches may indeed be more effective than others, and some pupils’ opinions less defensible, but pedagogically, in terms of managing the power relations in the classroom, it is counter-productive to continually insist on notions of truth and falsity at every point. From an ethical point of view, it is contended that anti-realist approaches to meta-ethics may represent a viable intellectual position, but from the point of view of normative ethics, notions of right and wrong still retain significant currency. From an epistemological point of view, it is argued using Karl Popper’s work that while it may be difficult to determine what constitutes a right answer, determining a wrong one is far more straightforward. In conclusion, it is clear that prospective teachers engaging in philosophy in the classroom, and also future teachers in general, require a far more nuanced philosophical understanding of the notions of right and wrong and truth and falsity. In view of this situation, if we wish to promote the effective teaching of philosophical thinking to children, or produce educators who can understand the conceptual limits of the claims they make and their very real and often serious practical and social consequences, it is recommended that philosophy be reinstated to a fundamental, foundational place within the pre-service teaching curriculum.

Ben Anderson, Affect and biopower: Towards a politics of life, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, Volume 37, Issue 1, January 2011, Pages 28-43
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2011.00441.x

Abstract
In this paper I stage an encounter between two concepts that have become popular placeholders for a broad concern with a politics of life: affect and biopower. Through engagement with Antonio Negri’s writings on the ‘real subsumption of life’ in contemporary capitalism and Michel Foucault’s lectures on neoliberalism, I show that understanding how forms of biopower work through affect requires attending to three relations: affective relations and capacities are object-targets for discipline, biopolitics, security and environmentality; affective life is the outside through which new ways of living may emerge; and specific collective affects (including ‘state-phobia’) are part of the conditions for the birth of forms of biopower. In what is simultaneously a departure from, and an affirmation of, recent work on affect, I argue that attending to the dynamics of affective life may become political as a counter to forms of biopower that work through processes of normalisation. The consequence is that understanding how biopower works on and through affect becomes a precondition for developing affirmative relations with affective life.

Author keywords
Affect; Biopolitics; Biopower; Life; Neoliberalism; Non-representationaltheories

Source Progressive Geographies

Mark Poster, intellectual historian of French thought and theorist of media and information, died yesterday. Mark Poster was one of the early commentators on Foucault’s work with his 1984 book Foucault, Marxism and History

Images et fonctions du théâtre dans la philosophie française contemporaine

Colloque organisé par Dimitra Panopoulos et Flore Garcin-Marrou

CIEPFC (Centre International d’Étude de Philosophie Française Contemporaine) /LAPS (Laboratoire des Arts et Philosophies de la Scène)
19-20 octobre / 23-24 novembre 2012, 9h-18h30, 45 rue d’Ulm 75005 Paris

Pour en savoir plus, Conference website

Programme complet en PDF

SUR MICHEL FOUCAULT
Samedi 20 octobre 2012
Modérateur : Mathieu Potte-Bonneville (ENS Lyon, directeur du CIPH)
14h : Collectif F 71 : L’acteur, metteur en scène comme « usager » des textes de Foucault.
14h30 : Bertrand Ogilvie (CIEPFC, Univ. Paris VIII) : Sur Michel Foucault.
15h : discussion
15h15 : pause

Dates à venir Collectif Foucault 71
Du 25 au 27 mars 2013, au TAP, Scène Nationale de Poitiers, Foucault 71
info et réservation

Notre Corps Utopique

En cours de production, un nouveau projet, Notre Corps Utopique à partir du texte de Michel Foucault, Le Corps Utopique

Contact Thérèse Coriou, 06 82 18 39 14, coriou.therese@wanadoo.fr
www.collectiff71.com

McKinlay, A.A , Carter, C.B, Pezet, E.C. Governmentality, power and organization (Editorial), Management and Organizational History, Volume 7, Issue 1, February 2013, Pages 3-15
https://doi.org/10.1177/1744935911429414

Abstract
Michel Foucault has moved from being marginal to organization studies to perhaps the most important authority in critical management studies. Yet his methods, historiography and the theoretical value of his work remain obscure, contested or, even worse, simply taken for granted. Governmentality, Foucault’s term for how institutions are imagined, offers a way of understanding how specific forms of knowledge and power emerge, develop and decline. Governmentality brings Foucault very close to Max Weber’s concern with rationalization and the ways that individuals come to govern themselves. Governmentality looks at administrative powers and knowledges that shape our everyday lives. For Foucault, as for Weber, administrative power is not of secondary importance but essential to the ‘successes’ and ‘failures’ of disciplinary institutions and societies.

Author keywords
governmentality; Max Weber’s bureaucracy; Michel Foucault

The Foucault Society Reading Group, 2012-2013

Michel Foucault, “Society Must Be Defended” Lectures at the College de France, 1975-1976

Introductory Meeting:
Thursday, October 11
7:00-9:30pm

CUNY Graduate Center
365 Fifth Avenue, Room 5409
New York, NY, USA

In this year-long discussion group, we will study Foucault’s 1975-76 lecture course alongside Johanna Oksala’s newly published, Foucault, Politics, and Violence (2012)

At our our introductory meeting this week we will discuss central themes and our plan for the semester.  Our second meeting will be Thursday, October 25.

We will meet every two weeks at the Graduate Center throughout the 2012-2013 academic year.

Please join us!
Open to the public.

We recommend that participants have some familiarity with Foucault’s work.

Suggested donation: $10/meeting.
Registration: foucaultsocietyorg@gmail.com

For complete description, see our website.

Questions? Please contact
Kevin Jobe, Reading Group Director, at foucaultsocietyorg@gmail.com.

About the Foucault Society:

The Foucault Society is an independent, nonprofit educational organization offering a variety of programs dedicated to the critical study of the ideas of Michel Foucault (1926-1984).  All of our events are open to the public. We welcome new participants who have an interest in Foucault’s work and its impact on diverse areas of inquiry, including critical social theory, philosophy, politics, history, culture, gender/sexuality studies, and the arts.

Website
Facebook
Twitter:  @foucaultsociety

E-mail: foucaultsocietyorg@gmail.com

Call for papers: Alternative Enlightenments

Submission deadline: Saturday, December 1

Conference dates:
Friday, April 26 2013 – Sunday, April 28 2013

Conference Venue:
Program in Cultures, Civilizations and Ideas, Bilkent University
Ankara, Turkey

Details
From Kant’s seminal essay “What is Enlightenment?” through the manifold critical responses of the twentieth century, the ambiguity of a term designating both a paradigmatic approach to human thought or autonomy, and a specific historical period, remains. How distinct is the concept of Enlightenment from the era of European history long taken to have discovered or invented it? This symposium proposes an examination of Enlightenments in the plural, welcoming both revisionary accounts of the Age of Enlightenment and explorations of Enlightenment in other times and places.

With an eye to translating the idea of Enlightenment, scholars have traced its many national and regional varieties. Discussions of an Ionian or an Athenian Enlightenment, of movements of Enlightenment in the medieval caliphate or the Ottoman Empire, share the contemporary intellectual landscape with debates on the continuing relevance of the eighteenth-century Enlightenment to the current global order. We are interested in the way the term has been borrowed and translated, creating a constellation of “Enlightenments” bound together by family resemblances. Is there still a singular project of Enlightenment (i.e. the critique of received ideas and inherited values, in particular religious ones; the promotion of rational or empirical methods; the creation of cosmopolitan and secular spaces), or has the term broken out of its historical mold to designate a more fluid set of cultural projects and practices? Where do we stand today with regard to the Enlightenment? After all, the continuation of a politics and practice of Enlightenment may depend on the spatial and temporal translations we propose to explore. Such displacements give new life to the idea of Enlightenment, even as the term is contested, criticized and transformed.

Topics of interest include:

Ionian / Athenian Enlightenment
Secularism, materialism, the immanent frame
Literatures of Worldliness in East and West: Renaissance, Tanzimat, Arab and
Near Eastern Enlightenments
Orientalism and Occidentalism
Diplomacy, correspondence, the figure of the court philosopher
What is Enlightenment: Kant, Foucault and beyond
(The) Enlightenment in the Americas
The public and the private: cross-cultural studies of an Enlightenment distinction
Travel literature, satire, and utopian fiction
Nineteenth century national Enlightenments, nationalism vs. internationalism
Enlightenment and Empire
The rhetoric of Enlightenment in geopolitics, the claims of the West
Material culture, exchange, circulation, accumulation, dispersal
Enlightenment and its others: mysticism, hermeticism and the arcane
The metaphorics of Enlightenment: illumination, dawn, twilight and dusk
Where do we stand today with regard to (the) Enlightenment?
Critical theory / social and political practice

Submission of Abstracts

Please submit an abstract of no more than 300 words to wcoker@bilkent.edu.tr by
December 1, 2012.

The Program in Cultures, Civilizations and Ideas at Bilkent University is an
interdisciplinary humanities program focusing on Comparative Literature, Classics and Philosophy. We teach the university’s core courses in the humanities as well as the bi-yearly Bilkent undergraduate “honors seminars” and other elective courses in our respective fields of specialization. Our program began in 1999 as part of an initiative on the part of the university administration to craft a more global curriculum and to foster greater dialogue between cultures and disciplines. We are proud to host the Alternative Enlightenments Conference, 26-28 April 2013 in Ankara.

For more information or to ask questions, please contact us at wcoker@bilkent.edu.tr.

Peter Triantafillou, New Forms of Governing: A Foucauldian inspired analysis. Palgrave Macmillan, August 2012.

Description
By elaborating the conceptual framework and methodological guidelines suggested by Michel Foucault, Peter Triantafillou analyzes the ways in which public organizations over the last few decades have become the target of numerous interventions which, for better or for worse, have sought to improve their efficiency and quality. The author exposes how various political and social science theories were adopted in often unpredictable ways in the process of reforming the public sector. By focusing on Britain, France and Denmark, Triantafillou examines changes and developments in the governing of life, labour and learning, showing that across different political regimes, the development of particular forms of freedom played a crucial role in enabling these political interventions. This volume will be of interest to those scholars and students interested in using Foucault’s concepts and methodological principles to critically analyze political interventions.

Contents

Introduction
Purpose and Concepts
Methodological Challenges
Governing the Performance of Governments
Activating Government
Life: New Forms of Public Health
Labour: Employment and Activation
Learning: The Making of Competent and Entrepreneurial Populations
Conclusion

Author
PETER TRIANTIFILLOU is Associate Professor of Politics and Administration, Roskilde University, Denmark. His research deals with the exercise of power and freedom in public organizations and welfare policies. He has co-edited (with Eva Sørensen) The Politics of Self-Governance and (with Jacob Torfing) Interactive Policymaking, Metagovernance and Democracy.

“L’homme après sa mort, Kant après Foucault”
Special Issue of Rue Descartes

Rue Descartes 2012/3 (n° 75). 128 pages.
ISSN : 1144-0821
ISSN en ligne : 2102-5819.
Lien : http://www.cairn.info/revue-rue-descartes-2012-3.htm.

Sommaire

Horizons
De livres considérés à tort comme mineurs
Diogo Sardinha

Corpus
Michel Foucault, philosophe de la liberté ? Sur sa lecture de Kant dans l’Introduction à l’Anthropologie
Jörg Volbers

La thèse complémentaire dans la trajectoire de Foucault
Márcio Alves da Fonseca et Salma Tannus Muchail

L’idée de sensibilité transcendantale dans l’Introduction à l’Anthropologie de Kant
Marco Díaz Marsá

Différence entre l’anthropologie pragmatique et l’anthropologie métaphysique
Diogo Sardinha

Le grondement de la critique du sujet fondateur dans le réveil du sommeil anthropologique
Roberto Nigro

La présence de Descartes et de Kant dans l’œuvre de Foucault
Guilherme Castelo Branco

Parole
L’anthropologie philosophique et l’anthropologie historique en débat
Étienne Balibar, Gunter Gebauer, Roberto Nigro et Diogo Sardinha

Périphéries
Au sujet du terrain – subjectivation et ethnologie
Mathieu Potte-Bonneville

Comment penser le temps présent ? De l’ontologie de l’actualité à l’ontologie sans l’être
Gabriel Rockhill