Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

A Conversation on Late Fascism
Alberto Toscano and Evan Calder Williams , e-flux, March 15, 2024

This is an edited version of the live event that took place on December 12, 2023 at e-flux in Brooklyn. Alberto Toscano’s Late Fascism: Race, Capitalism, and the Politics of Crisis is published by Verso.

[…]
AT: I remembered reading interviews Michel Foucault did with Cahiers du Cinema and another film magazine, which are not at all well known. In the early to mid-seventies, there is a set of films made by avant-garde or auteur European filmmakers—Cavani, Pasolini, Visconti, and others—that link the emergence of Nazism and fascism to questions of sexuality and gender. This was often done in rather dubious, or as we say today, problematic ways, and it leads to a lot of debate, some really historically curious debates.
[…]

But I think it’s a really interesting moment for a whole set of reasons. And Foucault intervenes in this. Foucault is both quite funny and quite insightful in some of these interviews.

He says that the first problem with these films is that they make us believe—which is both false and in its own way dangerous—that there was an erotic charisma to Nazism. He counters by saying that, at the sexual level, Nazism is like a marriage between an agronomist and a charwoman. (I forget exactly, it was some terrible sentence like that.) His point is that it’s the least sexy thing in the world. That’s what these films don’t get at all, because they’re obsessed with the leather and the boots and all the fetishism.

ECW: Can I read a couple sentences from the interview? Because it’s inimitable and worth hearing: “Nazism was not invented by the great erotic madmen of the twentieth century, but by the most sinister, boring, and disgusting petit bourgeois imaginable. Himmler was a vaguely agricultural type and married a nurse.” (Slightly mean to nurses, I have to say.) “We must understand that the concentration camps were born from the conjoined imagination of a hospital nurse and a chicken farmer, a hospital plus a chicken coop. That’s the phantasm behind the camps.” It’s a pretty remarkable interview.
[…]

Foucault – 40 Years After
Rethinking Foucault’s Historical Ontology of Ourselves:
Subjects, Subjectivation, Self-Practices

University of Innsbruck, Austria
June 21-22, 2024 (June 21: online)
Abstracts: April 1, 2024

CALL FOR PAPERS

Foucault’s 1984 discussion of Kant’s 1784 “What is Enlightenment?” emphasizes the historical ontology of ourselves as our most noble task. Forty years after Foucault’s death (and 300 years after Kant’s birth), society has changed. Capitalist globalization has slowed, and the forgotten Cold War has been reanimated. Monopolies are increasing, and the neoliberal self-governing of people appears to be undermined by the algorithmization of subtle control techniques.

Accordingly, our meeting invites contributions that discuss the reception of Foucault’s analyses under the lens of recent social change: Did or in how far did the formation of subject positions in discourses, processes of subjectivation in governmental power practices, or the constitution of ourselves as ethical selves in self-technologies change compared to Foucault’s late account of the subject constitution in neoliberal capitalism? We will rethink and work with Foucault on an updated historical ontology of ourselves.

ABSTRACT SUBMISSION

We welcome proposals on any topic regarding the conference theme and request submission of abstracts (between 150-250 words) by April 1, 2024.

Please register an account and submit your abstract here: ABSTRACT SUBMISSION
Notification of acceptance & conference registration: early April
If acceptance notifications are needed prior to the submission deadline, please contact the organizers (Frank Welz, frank.welz@uibk.ac.at)

Sessions will depend on submitted papers. Possible session topics are:
1. Discourse and subject positions
2. Governmentality and subjectivation
3. Self-technologies and ethical selves
4. Historical ontology of ourselves

We expect the conference to begin on Friday morning as an online event. On Saturday morning (or Friday afternoon), it will be continued on-site. The meeting will conclude on Saturday, 6 pm. Presenters will have approximately 30-40 minutes combined for paper presentation and discussion. We look forward to your contribution!

REGISTRATION
Registration for conference attendance will open in April 2024.

Emanuel, T.
“It Is ‘About’ Nothing But Itself”: Tolkienian Theology Beyond the Domination of the Author (2023) Mythlore, 42 (1), pp. 29-53.

Abstract
There is a broad stream of Christian interpretation of J.R.R. Tolkien’s fiction, especially The Lord of the Rings, which views it as the intentionally, essentially Christian work of an intentionally, essentially Christian author. This reductive, exclusivist approach does not do justice to the complex, generative interactivity between Tolkien’s faith, the faith of his readers (or lack thereof), and the text itself. Building on work by Veryln Flieger, Michael Drout, and Robin A. Reid, this paper interrogates how Christian Tolkien scholarship drafts Tolkien the human sub-creator to perform Foucault’s author-function by suppressing his contradictions and painting a figure whose life and works speak with a single, authoritative voice. Then, drawing on progressive Christian and Jewish hermeneutics and Tolkien’s own writings on intent and the freedom of the reader, it proposes a hermeneutics of Tolkienian inspiration that honors Tolkien’s Roman Catholic foundations, the sub-creative integrity of his secondary world, and the religious diversity of the readers who draw such deep wells of meaning from it. In so doing, it intervenes in ongoing conflict in the field of Tolkien Studies and Tolkien fandom more broadly over diverse interpretations of his fiction and the control of Tolkienian meaning. © 2023, The Mythopoeic Society. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords
Eucatastrophe; Foucault, Michel—Literary theories; Hermeneutics; Hermeneutics; Jewish theology; Religion; Theology; Tolkien, J.R.R.—Religious interpretations; Tolkien, J.R.R.—Theology; Tolkien, J.R.R.—Theory of eucatastrophe

Kjærgaard, A., Bergmann, R., Blasco, M., Padan, T., Elliott, C., Callahan, J., Robinson, S., Wall, T.
Subtle activism: Heterotopic principles for unsettling contemporary academia from within (2023) Organization

DOI: 10.1177/13505084231167702

Abstract
Research on academic activism tends to foreground vociferous and explicit forms of activism that pursue predefined political agendas. Against this backdrop, this article proposes that academic activism can take more subtle forms. Writing as an academic activist collective, we unpack what subtle activism might look like within the context of contemporary academia. We use Foucault’s concept of heterotopia to argue that subtle activism can expand the space of what is possible in academia today by experimenting with quietly unsettling norms rather than overtly opposing or rejecting them. We offer a set of principles that might underpin a subtle activist agenda, extrapolated from practices from colleagues and from own activist collective. We hope that these principles may serve to inspire other academics wishing to engage in subtle activism by unsettling everyday practices that discreetly challenge the status quo, thereby contributing to gently shifting the agenda for how it is possible to conduct intellectual work in the contemporary neoliberal university context. © The Author(s) 2023.


Author Keywords

Academic activism; collective action; Foucault; heterotopia; individualization; instrumentalization; intensification; neoliberal university; resistance; subtle activism

Chassagnol, A., Marie, C.
Le musée du futur: imaginaire du musée dans la littérature contemporaine imagée, (2023) Culture et Musees, (41), pp. 119-149.

DOI: 10.4000/culturemusees.9947

Abstract
This article elaborates a poetic (in the ancient Greek sense of poesis) description of the future museum on the basis of the portrayal and fictionalization of museums in contemporary illustrated literature. Up until now, the museum in literature has mostly been studied from the perspective of novels. Illustrated literature (picture books, illustrated and graphic novels) has long been neglected despite the fact that it contains original and visionary ideas for how museums exist as institutions, but also as specific markers of space and even time. These images are not simply the fixed visual transcriptions of museums. Their appearance is the result of close collaboration which no longer merely operates between author and illustrator, but directly between museum and illustrator commissioned by them to reflect upon its perceptions, with publishing houses inviting authors and artists (Enki Bilal, Christophe Ono-dit-Biot and Adel Abdessemed) to deliver their vision of a museum by spending a night there. On the basis of a corpus of French and English language works published in the 2000s, this article presents the current trends revealed by these works and how their modelling of the museum of today in fact prefigures that of tomorrow. Illustrated literature seems to reinvent museums on a human scale, as a heterotopia (to use a term from Michel Foucault) of affect, in which it is more important to preserve and question the essence of life as opposed to the essence of the world, museums of people and relations (as Nicolas Bourriaud suggests), museums of self, at once mobile, intimate and humane. © 2023 Avignon University. All rights reserved

Author Keywords
contemporary literature; graphic novels; illustration; museums; novels; picture books

Niesche, Richard. “Educational Leadership as a (Consumer) Culture Industry.” In Educational Leadership and Critical Theory: What Can School Leaders Learn from the Critical Theorists, edited by Charles L. Lowery , Chetanath Gautam , Robert White and Michael E. Hess , 57–74. Educational Leadership: Innovative, Critical and Interdisciplinary Perspectives. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2024. pp. 57-74.

http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781350353459.ch-003

EXTRACT
This chapter brings together into conversation the work of Theodor Adorno, Bernard Stiegler, and Michel Foucault to examine how educational leadership as a field has been seduced by a consumer capitalist industry in the pursuit of “best practice” approaches and “what works” discourses as answers to educational problems and issues. Specifically I explore the notion of the culture industry (Adorno 1991; Horkheimer and Adorno 1979) as an important precursor to what Bernard Stiegler more recently terms a hyper-capitalist consumer industry (Stiegler 2011, 2014), and think how this work can understand and interrogate many current approaches to educational leadership. In addition, I also draw on the ideas of Foucault in concert with Stiegler through the notions of biopower (Foucault 1976) and psychopower (Stiegler 2010). In particular, I argue that there has been a consistent flow of writing in educational leadership that is increasingly designed for ongoing consumption, badged for the purposes of solving many problems in education around the world—with “leadership” as a key driver of such reforms and changes. Thomson et al. (2013) have previously referred to these kinds of discourses as a Transnational Leadership Package (TLP). I argue that these discourses have manifested largely through school effectiveness and improvement research that can also be linked to the rise of gurus, experts, and edupreneurs to form what Kellerman calls a “leadership industry” (2012) but in education….

In Memoriam: Marcelo Otero (1960-2024)
Professor, Department of sociology at the Université du Québec à Montréal (UQAM), member of the Centre de recherche de Montréal sur les inégalités sociales, les discriminations et les pratiques alternatives de citoyenneté (CRÉMIS), and author of Foucault sociologue. Critique de la raison impure (PUQ, 2021)

Specialist in Foucault, whose destabilizing and fruitful thought “renews traditional ways of philosophizing, of thinking about the social, of making history, but above all of problematizing social issues” (2021), Marcelo Otero has been interested throughout his career in the rules of contemporary individuality, or in the articulation between singularities and socialities. His transversal sociological object was what he called “complex social problems”. Seeking to follow the trace of the relationship to normativity, he wondered about what poses a problem, to whom it poses a problem, in what social contexts and for what effects. Mental health and depression, the role of institutions in the construction of these phenomena, drug consumption and its consequences, and social suffering were his favorite subjects.

His passion for debate, his insatiable desire to deconstruct in order to renew and modernize sociological thought is at the center of his approach as a researcher and has favored the dissemination of his thought in many countries.

Hommage à Marcelo Otero – Extraits vidéo, Feb 9, 2024

Table ronde – Penser les sociétés punitives après Foucault, 20 April 2023

With thanks to Sylvain Lafleur for sending this obituary to Foucault News

Call for Papers for Special Issue “Colors in Econarratives about the Human and More-than-Human World“, Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies

Guest Editors: Professor Peggy Karpouzou and Dr. Nikoleta Zampaki

Colors are not only visual stimuli, but also social constructs that play a pivotal role in our perception, psychology, behavior and communication. Colors also evoke a range of emotions, senses and memories that are deeply rooted in various cultural, national and traditional contexts. The meaning, role and impact of colors can vary widely across different linguistic, cultural and historical periods, reflecting complex interactions between language, aesthetics and relationships. The various differences in color symbolism illustrate how cultural beliefs and practices surrounding our daily life, events, occasions and habits can shape the meanings attributed to colors that can evolve over time, e.g. the color black symbolizes death or evil, the color white symbolizes peace and purity (e.g., Conroy, 1921; Birren, 2013; Feisner and Reed, 2014). Colors’ varieties are actually described in terms of “color pluralism” (Mizrahi, 2023), which is not only restricted to the varieties of colors, but it is open to the different perspectives between humans and species when both perceive each other via senses e.g. see them, feel them, taste them in food, etc.

Understanding the complex and dynamic relationship between colors and nature requires an interdisciplinary approach in Environmental Humanities that draws on multiple fields of knowledge, such as literary theory and cultural criticism, psychology, linguistics, arts, philosophy, etc. in order to understand the colors’ nature, function, role and impact on life-forms and the world around us. For instance, ecophenomenology and ecopsychology focus on the embodied experience and psychology within nature respectively, e.g., how we perceive and interpret the colors around us as well as how they affect our psychology by often considering them as a ‘healing space’. Our thinking is oriented to the study of nature, ecology and colors articulated in terms of “prismatic ecology” which delves into the matter of how the vibrant worlds are formed by colors (Cohen, 2013), the reflections, symbolisms, function and role within the natural processes and phenomena as well as their impact on the human and more-than-human world (e.g. flora, fauna, micro-organisms, etc.).

An ecological narration describes human interactions with other species and the physical environment, drawing from narratology, ecology, critical discourse analysis as well as ecolinguistics, offering insights on how ecology, language and narration raise awareness and play a pivotal role in structuring our life. Econarratives’ kinds, structure, content, rhetoric and poetics convey environmental understanding and knowledge via spatiotemporal organization, characterization, narratological techniques etc., paving the way to offer new perspectives and approaches to re-connect humanity with nature. We query how readers perceive and engage with econarratives and how the processes of encountering them stand to affect real-word behaviors and values (e.g., James and Morel, 2023; von Mossner, 2017; Slovic, 2008). In this sense, econarratives mobilize affect and offer factual insights into the functioning of ecologies by describing life-forms and their entanglements.

By studying econarratives of colors we will focus on questions such as what kind of narrations are embodied theoretically, literally, philosophically, etc. How do cultural norms and values shape our ecological thinking on colors? How are colors involved with our senses and what kind of visual streams are offered? How about colors’ representations in cultural, e.g. literal, aesthetic, etc. texts, and how about the role and impact of colors in human and more-than-human life-forms’ behaviors, senses, emotions, moods, thinking and welfare? How is our thought expanded to colors beyond texts and works (Iovino and Oppermann, 2013)? How do colors communicate e.g., social, political and religious meanings in different cultures, including indigenous communities? How do environmental concerns affect the production and consumption of colors? How do authors, artists, etc. use color to express eco-aesthetic, symbolic, or functional ideas? How do scholars study colors in Environmental Humanities, Posthumanities, etc.?

In this special issue, econarratives of colors explore the complexities of pairing material environments with their representations with narrative forms of environmental understanding and ‘propose’ a change in how we interact with the environment today. This endeavor could be effectively executed while exploring storytelling of coloring imaginaries and sustainable futures as ‘narrative rehabilitation’ to draw attention to values and responsibilities and envision strategies to avoid possible ‘disastrous narrative endings’. Econarratives of colors could also be a new approach to overcoming the traditional dichotomies of how we see the world around us, including ourselves, laying the ground to think beyond colors in a more-than-human world. They might also encourage us to think beyond the classical narratological analysis, and consider new analytical tools suited to the current planetary challenges.

Possible topics may include but are not limited to the following:

• narratives of colors in Environmental Humanities, Posthumanities, Environmental Digital Humanities, Blue Humanities, Ocean Humanities, Plant Humanities, Animal Studies, Medical Humanities, Energy Humanities, Public Humanities, Citizen Humanities
• colors in -cenes, e.g. Anthropocene, Symbiocene, Capitalocene, etc.
• colors in ecocriticism, eco-poetics, ecofeminism, queer ecologies, etc.
• econarratives of colors in comparative and global literature
• econarratives of colors in continental philosophy
• econarratives of colors in visual, media and film studies
• colors and soundscape ecologies
• colors in eco-/bio-art
• colors in food studies
• ecotheological, ecopsychological and indigenous environmental approaches on colors
• colors and biopolitics
• the term, concept and language of colors in ecolinguistics
• colors in green pedagogies/education studies
• storytelling of re-connecting/repairing humanity with nature via colors
• storytelling of coloring imaginaries and sustainable futures

The working language is English. Please send an abstract of up to 300 words and further queries to Professor Karpouzou’s e-mail at pkarpouzou@phil.uoa.gr and Dr. Zampaki’s e-mail at nikzamp@phil.uoa.gr until the 31st of August 2024. After the abstracts’ final selection and approval/acceptance, the Editors will notify the author(s) to submit their full in articles (6.000-8.000 words) to their e-mails by the end of February 2025.

URL: https://nebraskapressjournals.unl.edu/calls-for-papers/

CFP: Special Issue: Ecologies of Life and Death in the Anthropocene, Lagoonscapes
The Venice Journal of Environmental Humanities

Guest editors: Professor Peggy Karpouzou, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece & Dr. Nikoleta Zampaki, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Both life and death are natural states of humans and non-humans, coexisting and at the same time in an implicit ‘conflict’. The perception and mostly the experiences of death have varied through different local communities historically, often aiming to explain death through philosophical or religious interpretations of human and non-humans’ afterlife (e.g. Merchant 1979).

In the present condition of a precarious planetary time when environmental crises, wars, violence and pandemics are before us, entire ecosystems are annihilated or even destroyed. Human and more-than-human world’s vulnerabilities get amplified as death and loss become urgent environmental concerns, manifested in many cultural connotations, e.g. literary, artistic, philosophical etc., seeking to explore and explain death matter in nature as well as the consequences of death on species’ behavior and psychology. “It is about recognizing our shared vulnerabilities to human and non-human bodies, and embracing our complicity in the death of these other bodies- however painful that process may be” (Cunsolo 2017, 3-4).

Writers and artists have explored the representations of death matters beyond the human, the mourning for past, present and future ecological loss (Barnett 2022), while attempting to visualize and express ecological grief, mourning and melancholia, carve out memorial spaces and also imagine practices of the afterlife. For example, in literature, the poetic subgenre of elegy found as (anti-)pastoral elegy, eco-elegy or “ecological lament” (Morton 2009) is built on the poet’s acceptance of “death as natural […], in line with the season pattern and rebirth” (Twiddy 2012). Here death is not only synonymous with a biological end, but a rebirth, a state of a new being. However, the loss of nature itself, turning it into a ‘mirror’ of human loss, redefines the traditional elegy’s search for consolation (Sacks 1987).

Grounded in the theoretical framework of death studies, this special issue explores life and death eco-imaginaries and engagements, as they are interwoven through the study of the human and more-than-human world. It is there where an ontology of ecologies of life and death is being exposed and where the ethical territories of eco-grief and eco-mourning unfold. Therefore, the possibility of studying the ecology of life and death is questioned: How do we come up with death issues in nature? Is nature grievable? How do we mourn for it? How about the circular and linear way between life and death in nature’s spatiality and time? How about writers and artists’ perception of ecologies of life and death and how are they represented in texts and artworks? How do ecologies of life and death affect the way of writing or artistic outcome? How about the posthuman perspective on dead bodies and afterlife issues? What will it mean to live and die in the Anthropocene? (e.g., Scranton, 2016; Stiegler 2018).

While the ecologies of life and death give way to ‘decentralize’, even ‘deconstruct’ concepts like melancholy, grief and mourning, also ‘view’ the last ones as an approach of resilience and symbiosis between them, even a ‘spur’ to act. In this sense, there is a need to re-organize what is holding humanity back, such as the fear of humans’ destructive power, and take action to achieve life’s preservation in order to build sustainable futures. We particularly welcome submissions that revolve around, but are not limited to, the following axes and concepts:

• ecologies of life and death in ecocriticism, ecopsychology, eco/bio-philosophies, bioethics, plant humanities, animal studies, etc.
• eco-anxiety, eco-grief, eco-mourning, solastalgia, toxic environments, extinction studies, political ecology of death
• ecologies of life and death in -cene, e.g., Anthropocene, Neganthropocene, Necrocene, Symbiocene etc.
• the genre of elegy (e.g., eco-elegy, “ecological lament”, (anti-)pastoral elegy etc.
• ecologies of life and death in continental philosophy
• ecologies of life and death in posthumanities (e.g., posthumanism, transhumanism, a-humanism, meta-humanism, anti-humanism, super-humanism etc.)
• ecologies of life and death in medical humanities (e.g., pandemics, epidemics, plagues, biotechnology etc.)
• ecologies of life and death in religious studies and anthropology
• postcolonial narrations of death
• “necropolitics” (Mbembe), “bare life” (Agamben), “slow death” (Berlant)
• ecologies of life and death in indigenous studies
• human and more-than-human world in queer death studies and gothic studies
• ecologies of life and death in disability studies
• ecologies of life and death in arts and aesthetics / ars moriendi
• ecologies of life and death in visual studies, media studies, film studies
• memorials, ways of remembering, rituals of eco-mourning
• images, tools and practices of the afterlife in literature, philosophy and arts (e.g., mummification, cryonics, end-of-life applications, 3D printing for facial reconstruction etc.)

Deadline for full articles’ submissions: Kindly submit a full article of no more than 50,000 characters (spaces and references included), an abstract of no more than 650 characters spaces included, and at least five keywords by 31 of July 2024 at the latest.

Should your article be accepted for inclusion in the upcoming December issue, you will receive an email containing instructions on how to upload your final version within 15 days from receipt. Such articles must be suitable for blind peer review.

Please make sure to obtain the necessary reproduction rights documentation if you need to include photos in your text.

Articles must be written in English. In case you have further queries, you are welcome to send an e-mail to the Editors’ e-mails: pkarpouzou@phil.uoa.gr and nikzamp@phil.uoa.gr.

urls: https://ecfpeerflow.unive.it/abstracts/form/journal/25/324

https://edizionicafoscari.unive.it/en/edizioni4/riviste/the-venice-journal-of-environmental-humanities/info#call

In Memoriam: Marnia Lazreg, CUNY Graduate Centre, February 23, 2024

See also Marnia Lazreg, Pathbreaking Hunter Sociology Professor, 83, Hunter CUNY, February 26, 2024

Marnia Lazreg, an emerita professor of sociology at Hunter College who was affiliated with the Graduate Center, died on January 13. She was 83 and was being treated for cancer at a hospital in New York.

A Washington Post obituary noted that she “ranked among the most respected academic voices on women’s affairs in North Africa.”
[…]

In Foucault’s Orient, Lazreg undertook a comprehensive study of Foucault’s views on non-Western cultures, drawing not only on Foucault’s published work but also on original interviews she conducted with those who knew Foucault during his trips to non-Western countries, including Tunisia and Japan. Contemporary Sociology observed that the book paints “a devastating portrait” of Foucault. It was reissued in paperback in 2020. Lazreg discussed the book in a New Books Network podcast.

[…]