Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Johan Hyrén, Självskapelseetik bortom Foucault: En rättviseteori för ett mångkulturellt, liberalt och demokratiskt samhälle

The English title:

An Ethics of Self-creation Beyond Foucault: A Theory of Justice for a Multicultural, Liberal and Democratic Society.

This recently submitted thesis is written in Swedish but includes an extensive English summary at the end and can be downloaded from this University of Gothenburg link

Abstract
This thesis develops a normative theory of justice centered on the concept of subjectivation. The concept originates from (late) Foucault and is connected to his writing on ethics. Foucault did not himself elaborate on the subject in any great detail. This thesis, however, does, creating a theory of justice for a multicultural, liberal, democratic, society on the basis of subjectivation.

The basic principle of the theory is that a just society is one in which everyone has equal opportunity to engage in active subjectivation. This is related, but not synonymous, to Foucault’s ethics, which is sometimes summarized in a clichéd manner by referring to his statement that we should turn our life into “a piece of art”. I argue that the opportunity to engage in active subjectivation is what ought to be equally distributed in society. Active subjectivation is best understood in relation to its opposite, passive subjectivation. The latter refers to an identity that is molded, subjugated and constituted by power relations external to the subject; the former to an identity-formation attained by the subject’s conscious and active work on itself.

The thesis is divided into three parts. The first part deals with the foucaultian ethic and how it is related to its archaic predecessors. This part also develops a critique of Foucault’s version of the ethic of self-creation. In the second part I surpass the foucaultian ethics, creating my own version of the ethic of self-creation. The third and last part is devoted to the questions of group-based rights and organization of education, and tries to explicate how these issues could be handled by a state that affirms the ethic of self-creation.

Dotan Leshem College de France lectures 10.25.13.indd

PDF flyer

Alessandra Renzi and Greg Elmer, The Biopolitics of Sacrifice: Securing Infrastructure at the G20 Summit (2013) Theory, Culture and Society, 30 (5), pp. 45-69.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412474327

Abstract
This article investigates infrastructure spending from a biopolitical perspective and rethinks its connections to emerging regimes of (in)securitization. Starting with a study of the organization and contestation of the G8/G20 summits in Toronto in June 2010, the analysis moves through the shifty territory of a governmental logic that is reconfiguring the body politics of civic participation, as well as the ways in which discourses on economic growth, property and public safety intertwine in the aftermath of the 2008 global financial crisis. The case of Toronto shows significant changes to recent security practices, control techniques and funding arrangements. Rather than ‘war on terror’, ‘austerity and crisis’ are the new keywords sustaining current governmental rationality and the criminalization of dissent, which are no longer funded by defence budgets but by economic stimuli packages. This new rationality, while still relying on fear as an affective mode to mobilize masses, has exchanged a set of discourses on the clash of cultures or civilization for one on sacrifice. Following Foucault’s work on the government of populations and security, it is now possible to talk about ‘a sacrifice series’ to describe the series of elements that connect military or economic logics of (in)securitization.

Author Keywords
biopolitics; contemporary activism; crisis; Foucault; global city; militarization; neoliberalism

Poster Foucault New School

PDF Flyer

Audio of seminar

Saran Ghatak & Andrew Stuart Abel, Power/Faith: Governmentality, Religion, and Post-Secular Societies (2013) International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 26 (3), pp. 217-235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9141-z

Abstract
Foucault’s concept of governmentality, and its attending modalities of biopower and disciplinary technologies, provides a useful conceptual schema for the analysis of the role of religious and quasi-religious institutions in contemporary society. This is particularly important in the study of those neoliberal democratic states where religious organizations constitute an important presence in the civil society. As religion is thoroughly involved in the reproduction of social structure in most societies, an appraisal of the social and political importance of religious institutions is needed to understand the articulation and exercise of governmentality. This is not just limited to partnerships between state agencies and faith-based organizations in providing for social services, but also in rituals and other religious group activities of these organizations that play a vital role in shaping and molding the social and political subjectivities of the adherents. We argue that synergy between the scholarship on governmentality, and sociology of religion would allow for a more nuanced understanding of the politics and culture of post-secular societies.

Author Keywords
Civil society; Faith-based initiatives; Foucault; Governmentality; Post-secularism; Religion; Rituals

Nikolas Rose & Joelle M. Abi-Rached, Neuro:The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, Princeton University Press, 2013

The brain sciences are influencing our understanding of human behavior as never before, from neuropsychiatry and neuroeconomics to neurotheology and neuroaesthetics. Many now believe that the brain is what makes us human, and it seems that neuroscientists are poised to become the new experts in the management of human conduct. Neuro describes the key developments–theoretical, technological, economic, and biopolitical–that have enabled the neurosciences to gain such traction outside the laboratory. It explores the ways neurobiological conceptions of personhood are influencing everything from child rearing to criminal justice, and are transforming the ways we “know ourselves” as human beings. In this emerging neuro-ontology, we are not “determined” by our neurobiology: on the contrary, it appears that we can and should seek to improve ourselves by understanding and acting on our brains.

Neuro examines the implications of this emerging trend, weighing the promises against the perils, and evaluating some widely held concerns about a neurobiological “colonization” of the social and human sciences. Despite identifying many exaggerated claims and premature promises, Neuro argues that the openness provided by the new styles of thought taking shape in neuroscience, with its contemporary conceptions of the neuromolecular, plastic, and social brain, could make possible a new and productive engagement between the social and brain sciences.

Nikolas Rose is professor of sociology and head of the Department of Social Science, Health, and Medicine at King’s College London. His books include The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton). Joelle M. Abi-Rached is a PhD candidate in the history of science at Harvard University.

Review:

“Rose and Abi-Rached make a convincing argument for a more positive engagement between the social and brain sciences in their discussion of the effects of neuroscience on public understanding of the self.”–Wayne Hall, Lancet

“As the title implies, this book offers interesting thoughts and findings for any scholar with a connection to neuroscience.”–Choice

Endorsement:

“The ‘neurofication’ of the humanities, social sciences, public policy, and the law has attracted promoters and detractors. What we have lacked until now is a critical but open-minded look at ‘neuro.’ This is what Rose and Abi-Rached have given us in this thoughtful and well-researched book. They do not jump on the neuro bandwagon, but instead offer a clear accounting of its appeal, its precedents in psychology and genetics, its genuine importance, and ultimately its limitations. A fascinating and important book.”–Martha J. Farah, University of Pennsylvania

Neuro makes a significant and original contribution to our understanding of the impact of the brain sciences on social and cultural processes. The scholarship throughout is brilliant. This book gives us extremely perceptive, detailed, and illuminating analyses of what is actually being claimed in the various branches of the neurosciences. It will attract a great deal of interest and controversy.”–Emily Martin, author of Bipolar Expeditions: Mania and Depression in American Culture

“I enjoyed reading this book. It provides an interesting and comprehensive map of the many sciences and quasi-sciences that have embraced the ‘neuro’ prefix. I also appreciate how Rose and Abi-Rached manage to examine the explosion of ‘neuros’ with a critical eye, but without dismissing the genuine prospects that it may hold.”–Michael E. Lynch, Cornell University

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Acknowledgments ix
Abbreviations xi
Introduction 1

  • Beyond Cartesianism? 3
  • Governing through the Brain 6
  • Our Argument 9
  • Human Science? 23

One The Neuromolecular Brain 25

  • How Should One Do the History of the Neurosciences? 28
  • Infrastructure 38
  • A Neuromolecular Style of Thought 41
  • Enter Plasticity 47
  • A Neuromolecular and Plastic Brain 51

Two The Visible Invisible 53

  • The Clinical Gaze 55
  • Inscribed on the Body Itself 56
  • Open Up a Few Brains 61
  • Seeing the Living Brain 65
  • The Epidemiology of Visualization 74
  • The New Engines of Brain Visualization 80

Three What’s Wrong with Their Mice? 82

  • Artificiality? 85
  • Models1, Models2, Models3, Models4 (and Possibly Models5) 92
  • The Specificity of the Human 102
  • Translation 104
  • Life as Creation 108

Four All in the Brain? 110

  • To Define True Madness 113
  • The Burden of Mental Disorder 125
  • All in the Brain? 130
  • Neuropsychiatry and the Dilemmas of Diagnosis 137

Five The Social Brain 141

  • The “Social Brain Hypothesis” 143
  • Pathologies of the Social Brain 148
  • Social Neuroscience 151
  • Social Neuroscience beyond Neuroscience 156
  • Governing Social Brains 160

Six The Antisocial Brain 164

  • Embodied Criminals 167
  • Inside the Living Brain 173
  • Neurolaw? 177
  • The Genetics of Control 180
  • Nipping Budding Psychopaths in the Bud 190
  • Sculpting the Brain in Those Incredible Years 192
  • Governing Antisocial Brains 196

Seven Personhood in a Neurobiological Age 199

  • The Challenged Self 202
  • From the Pathological to the Normal 204
  • The Self: From Soul to Brain 213
  • A Mutation in Ethics and Self-Technologies? 219
  • Caring for the Neurobiological Self 223

Conclusion Managing Brains, Minds, and Selves 225

  • A Neurobiological Complex 225
  • Brains In Situ? 227
  • Coda: The Human Sciences in a Neurobiological Age 232

Appendix How We Wrote This Book 235

With thanks to Matt Ball for this info

Arthur E. Walzer, Parrēsia, Foucault, and the Classical Rhetorical Tradition
(2013) Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 43 (1), pp. 1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2012.740130

Abstract
In his last seminars, Michel Foucault analyzed parrēsia (frank speech) in classical Greece and Rome, a subject also addressed by classical rhetoricians. Foucault regards parrēsia as an idealized modality of truth telling-unartful, sincere, courageous speech that tells an unwelcome truth to power. Aligning rhetoric with flattery, Foucault excludes rhetorical parrēsia from his history of thought. This essay offers an alternative analysis of parrēsia from the perspective of classical rhetoric. Drawing especially on the comprehensive description in the Rhetorica Ad Herennium, this essay identifies within the classical tradition a feigned parrēsia as well as a sincere one and a rhetorically artful parrēsia as well as the unartful, bold one that Foucault favors. Furthermore, the essay traces a genealogy that highlights changes in the practice of parrēsia as the term is conceptualized in the context of friendship, at which point parrēsia takes on an unmistakably rhetorical character.

DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2012.740130

Appel à participation

Les samedi 26 et dimanche 27 octobre de 14h à 18h, le collectif F71 propose deux séances de travail avec des amateurs,
à l’occasion de sa résidence au Collectif 12 à Mantes la Jolie (78)

Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page

[Editor: Update 14 April 2026. See video on YouTube posted 1 October 2019]

Prochain rendez-vous

Le 18 octobre à 17h, performance à partir du texte Le corps utopique de Michel Foucault,
dans le cadre du Laboratoire Eutopia, Savoir/pouvoir, Saline Royale d’Arc et Senans (25)

Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page

Notre corps utopique

Le nouveau spectacle du collectif F71, Notre corps utopique,
à partir du texte de Michel Foucault, Le Corps Utopique, sera créé en décembre 2013.

Dans une conférence radiophonique donnée en 1966, Michel Foucault arpente le corps comme un territoire.
Espace a priori limité, personnel, imposé à chacun mais territoire que nous partageons en commun, sujet et objet de notre imaginaire. Comment s’emparer collectivement de ce corps utopique, lieu de tous les possibles ?

A venir en 2013-2014

Le 12 novembre à 19h30, Notre corps utopique – restitution d’atelier dans le cadre de TP-Travaux publics,
Le Carré, Scène Nationale, Château-Gontier (53)

Les 19 décembre à 14h30 et 20 décembre à 14h30 et 20h30, création de Notre corps utopique, Théâtre Eurydice, Plaisir (78)
avec le soutien de la Ferme de Bel Ebat, Guyancourt (78)

Du 7 au 22 janvier à 19h30, les Dimanche à 15h, Notre corps utopique, Théâtre de la Bastille, Paris (75)
(Relâche les 9, 13, 14 et 20 janvier)

Les 24 et 25 janvier à 20h30, Notre corps utopique, Collectif 12, Mantes la Jolie (78)

Les 27 et 29 mars à 19h00 et le 28 mars à 20h30, Foucault 71, Théâtre La Grange de Dorigny – Université de Lausanne (CH)

Contact

Mélanie Autier, 06 22 13 06 82, production.collectiff71@gmail.com

www.collectiff71.com

Paolo B. Vernaglione, Il bel rischio, Alfabeta2, Pubblicato il 30 settembre 2013

Update September 2025: Link above is to the archived page on the Wayback Machine

Scrivere è Il bel rischio perché è pericoloso. Essere nel linguaggio per l’animale umano comporta avere a che fare con il lato oscuro, il rovescio di sé, di cui oggi invero la superficie della prassi raramente rende conto. Nell’immensa opera di Foucault, scrivere significa confrontarsi con un’esteriorità, cioè riconoscere il mondo e l’insieme delle relazioni individuali, come effetto di un’azione comunque rischiosa in cui trovano corpo relazioni molteplici e intricate.

Nel 1968 il critico letterario della rivista “L’Art” Claude Bonnefoy, propone a Foucault una serie di interviste sul senso della scrittura come impresa personale. Leggere adesso quest’unica conversazione, interrotta e redatta da Philippe Artières, curatore dell’edizione francese del saggio, procura un piacere non dissimile da quello intenso e sfrangiato che si prova nello studiare Storia della follìa, Le parole e le cose, Il coraggio della verità. Con un supplemento, che emerge al vivo dalla puntuale traduzione di Antonella Moscati. Foucault infatti, incitato dalle domande di Bonnefoy, parla dello scrivere come “rovescio del ricamo”, cioè di quel modo in cui corpo e linguaggio tentano di aderire l’un l’altro nella radicale differenza che li separa.
[…]

Affiche (S2)

 

Collège International de Philosophie
Séminaire de recherche et d’enseignement
sous la direction de Orazio Irrera et Matthieu Renault

Race et colonialisme. Sur les épistémologies de la décolonisation

[Editor: Update 14 April 2026. See list of seminars 2011-2017]

Séminaire organisé en collaboration avec l’Université Paris-Est Créteil – EA4395 LIS,
la revue materiali foucaultiani et avec le soutien du Centre Parisien d’Études Critiques

Deuxième Séance

Lundi 14 octobre 2013 ; 18h30-20h30
Centre Parisien d’Études Critiques
(37 bis rue du Sentier, 75002 Paris : métro Bonne Nouvelle)

Le racisme et la question coloniale chez Deleuze et Foucault
< b>Guillaume Sibertin-Blanc (Université de Toulouse II – Le Mirail)
Schizo-analyse et décolonisation de l’inconscient

Orazio Irrera
Racisme et colonialisme chez et à partir de Michel Foucault