Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Poster Foucault New School

PDF Flyer

Audio of seminar

Saran Ghatak & Andrew Stuart Abel, Power/Faith: Governmentality, Religion, and Post-Secular Societies (2013) International Journal of Politics, Culture and Society, 26 (3), pp. 217-235.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10767-013-9141-z

Abstract
Foucault’s concept of governmentality, and its attending modalities of biopower and disciplinary technologies, provides a useful conceptual schema for the analysis of the role of religious and quasi-religious institutions in contemporary society. This is particularly important in the study of those neoliberal democratic states where religious organizations constitute an important presence in the civil society. As religion is thoroughly involved in the reproduction of social structure in most societies, an appraisal of the social and political importance of religious institutions is needed to understand the articulation and exercise of governmentality. This is not just limited to partnerships between state agencies and faith-based organizations in providing for social services, but also in rituals and other religious group activities of these organizations that play a vital role in shaping and molding the social and political subjectivities of the adherents. We argue that synergy between the scholarship on governmentality, and sociology of religion would allow for a more nuanced understanding of the politics and culture of post-secular societies.

Author Keywords
Civil society; Faith-based initiatives; Foucault; Governmentality; Post-secularism; Religion; Rituals

Nikolas Rose & Joelle M. Abi-Rached, Neuro:The New Brain Sciences and the Management of the Mind, Princeton University Press, 2013

The brain sciences are influencing our understanding of human behavior as never before, from neuropsychiatry and neuroeconomics to neurotheology and neuroaesthetics. Many now believe that the brain is what makes us human, and it seems that neuroscientists are poised to become the new experts in the management of human conduct. Neuro describes the key developments–theoretical, technological, economic, and biopolitical–that have enabled the neurosciences to gain such traction outside the laboratory. It explores the ways neurobiological conceptions of personhood are influencing everything from child rearing to criminal justice, and are transforming the ways we “know ourselves” as human beings. In this emerging neuro-ontology, we are not “determined” by our neurobiology: on the contrary, it appears that we can and should seek to improve ourselves by understanding and acting on our brains.

Neuro examines the implications of this emerging trend, weighing the promises against the perils, and evaluating some widely held concerns about a neurobiological “colonization” of the social and human sciences. Despite identifying many exaggerated claims and premature promises, Neuro argues that the openness provided by the new styles of thought taking shape in neuroscience, with its contemporary conceptions of the neuromolecular, plastic, and social brain, could make possible a new and productive engagement between the social and brain sciences.

Nikolas Rose is professor of sociology and head of the Department of Social Science, Health, and Medicine at King’s College London. His books include The Politics of Life Itself: Biomedicine, Power, and Subjectivity in the Twenty-First Century (Princeton). Joelle M. Abi-Rached is a PhD candidate in the history of science at Harvard University.

Review:

“Rose and Abi-Rached make a convincing argument for a more positive engagement between the social and brain sciences in their discussion of the effects of neuroscience on public understanding of the self.”–Wayne Hall, Lancet

“As the title implies, this book offers interesting thoughts and findings for any scholar with a connection to neuroscience.”–Choice

Endorsement:

“The ‘neurofication’ of the humanities, social sciences, public policy, and the law has attracted promoters and detractors. What we have lacked until now is a critical but open-minded look at ‘neuro.’ This is what Rose and Abi-Rached have given us in this thoughtful and well-researched book. They do not jump on the neuro bandwagon, but instead offer a clear accounting of its appeal, its precedents in psychology and genetics, its genuine importance, and ultimately its limitations. A fascinating and important book.”–Martha J. Farah, University of Pennsylvania

Neuro makes a significant and original contribution to our understanding of the impact of the brain sciences on social and cultural processes. The scholarship throughout is brilliant. This book gives us extremely perceptive, detailed, and illuminating analyses of what is actually being claimed in the various branches of the neurosciences. It will attract a great deal of interest and controversy.”–Emily Martin, author of Bipolar Expeditions: Mania and Depression in American Culture

“I enjoyed reading this book. It provides an interesting and comprehensive map of the many sciences and quasi-sciences that have embraced the ‘neuro’ prefix. I also appreciate how Rose and Abi-Rached manage to examine the explosion of ‘neuros’ with a critical eye, but without dismissing the genuine prospects that it may hold.”–Michael E. Lynch, Cornell University

TABLE OF CONTENTS:

Acknowledgments ix
Abbreviations xi
Introduction 1

  • Beyond Cartesianism? 3
  • Governing through the Brain 6
  • Our Argument 9
  • Human Science? 23

One The Neuromolecular Brain 25

  • How Should One Do the History of the Neurosciences? 28
  • Infrastructure 38
  • A Neuromolecular Style of Thought 41
  • Enter Plasticity 47
  • A Neuromolecular and Plastic Brain 51

Two The Visible Invisible 53

  • The Clinical Gaze 55
  • Inscribed on the Body Itself 56
  • Open Up a Few Brains 61
  • Seeing the Living Brain 65
  • The Epidemiology of Visualization 74
  • The New Engines of Brain Visualization 80

Three What’s Wrong with Their Mice? 82

  • Artificiality? 85
  • Models1, Models2, Models3, Models4 (and Possibly Models5) 92
  • The Specificity of the Human 102
  • Translation 104
  • Life as Creation 108

Four All in the Brain? 110

  • To Define True Madness 113
  • The Burden of Mental Disorder 125
  • All in the Brain? 130
  • Neuropsychiatry and the Dilemmas of Diagnosis 137

Five The Social Brain 141

  • The “Social Brain Hypothesis” 143
  • Pathologies of the Social Brain 148
  • Social Neuroscience 151
  • Social Neuroscience beyond Neuroscience 156
  • Governing Social Brains 160

Six The Antisocial Brain 164

  • Embodied Criminals 167
  • Inside the Living Brain 173
  • Neurolaw? 177
  • The Genetics of Control 180
  • Nipping Budding Psychopaths in the Bud 190
  • Sculpting the Brain in Those Incredible Years 192
  • Governing Antisocial Brains 196

Seven Personhood in a Neurobiological Age 199

  • The Challenged Self 202
  • From the Pathological to the Normal 204
  • The Self: From Soul to Brain 213
  • A Mutation in Ethics and Self-Technologies? 219
  • Caring for the Neurobiological Self 223

Conclusion Managing Brains, Minds, and Selves 225

  • A Neurobiological Complex 225
  • Brains In Situ? 227
  • Coda: The Human Sciences in a Neurobiological Age 232

Appendix How We Wrote This Book 235

With thanks to Matt Ball for this info

Arthur E. Walzer, Parrēsia, Foucault, and the Classical Rhetorical Tradition
(2013) Rhetoric Society Quarterly, 43 (1), pp. 1-21.

https://doi.org/10.1080/02773945.2012.740130

Abstract
In his last seminars, Michel Foucault analyzed parrēsia (frank speech) in classical Greece and Rome, a subject also addressed by classical rhetoricians. Foucault regards parrēsia as an idealized modality of truth telling-unartful, sincere, courageous speech that tells an unwelcome truth to power. Aligning rhetoric with flattery, Foucault excludes rhetorical parrēsia from his history of thought. This essay offers an alternative analysis of parrēsia from the perspective of classical rhetoric. Drawing especially on the comprehensive description in the Rhetorica Ad Herennium, this essay identifies within the classical tradition a feigned parrēsia as well as a sincere one and a rhetorically artful parrēsia as well as the unartful, bold one that Foucault favors. Furthermore, the essay traces a genealogy that highlights changes in the practice of parrēsia as the term is conceptualized in the context of friendship, at which point parrēsia takes on an unmistakably rhetorical character.

DOI: 10.1080/02773945.2012.740130

Appel Ă  participation

Les samedi 26 et dimanche 27 octobre de 14h à 18h, le collectif F71 propose deux séances de travail avec des amateurs,
à l’occasion de sa résidence au Collectif 12 à Mantes la Jolie (78)

Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page

[Editor: Update 14 April 2026. See video on YouTube posted 1 October 2019]

Prochain rendez-vous

Le 18 octobre Ă  17h, performance Ă  partir du texte Le corps utopique de Michel Foucault,
dans le cadre du Laboratoire Eutopia, Savoir/pouvoir, Saline Royale d’Arc et Senans (25)

Pour en savoir plus, visitez cette page

Notre corps utopique

Le nouveau spectacle du collectif F71, Notre corps utopique,
à partir du texte de Michel Foucault, Le Corps Utopique, sera créé en décembre 2013.

Dans une conférence radiophonique donnée en 1966, Michel Foucault arpente le corps comme un territoire.
Espace a priori limité, personnel, imposé à chacun mais territoire que nous partageons en commun, sujet et objet de notre imaginaire. Comment s’emparer collectivement de ce corps utopique, lieu de tous les possibles ?

A venir en 2013-2014

Le 12 novembre Ă  19h30, Notre corps utopique – restitution d’atelier dans le cadre de TP-Travaux publics,
Le Carré, Scène Nationale, Château-Gontier (53)

Les 19 décembre à 14h30 et 20 décembre à 14h30 et 20h30, création de Notre corps utopique, Théâtre Eurydice, Plaisir (78)
avec le soutien de la Ferme de Bel Ebat, Guyancourt (78)

Du 7 au 22 janvier à 19h30, les Dimanche à 15h, Notre corps utopique, Théâtre de la Bastille, Paris (75)
(Relâche les 9, 13, 14 et 20 janvier)

Les 24 et 25 janvier Ă  20h30, Notre corps utopique, Collectif 12, Mantes la Jolie (78)

Les 27 et 29 mars Ă  19h00 et le 28 mars Ă  20h30, Foucault 71, Théâtre La Grange de Dorigny – UniversitĂ© de Lausanne (CH)

Contact

Mélanie Autier, 06 22 13 06 82, production.collectiff71@gmail.com

www.collectiff71.com

Paolo B. Vernaglione, Il bel rischio, Alfabeta2, Pubblicato il 30 settembre 2013

Update September 2025: Link above is to the archived page on the Wayback Machine

Scrivere è Il bel rischio perché è pericoloso. Essere nel linguaggio per l’animale umano comporta avere a che fare con il lato oscuro, il rovescio di sé, di cui oggi invero la superficie della prassi raramente rende conto. Nell’immensa opera di Foucault, scrivere significa confrontarsi con un’esteriorità, cioè riconoscere il mondo e l’insieme delle relazioni individuali, come effetto di un’azione comunque rischiosa in cui trovano corpo relazioni molteplici e intricate.

Nel 1968 il critico letterario della rivista “L’Art” Claude Bonnefoy, propone a Foucault una serie di interviste sul senso della scrittura come impresa personale. Leggere adesso quest’unica conversazione, interrotta e redatta da Philippe Artières, curatore dell’edizione francese del saggio, procura un piacere non dissimile da quello intenso e sfrangiato che si prova nello studiare Storia della follìa, Le parole e le cose, Il coraggio della verità. Con un supplemento, che emerge al vivo dalla puntuale traduzione di Antonella Moscati. Foucault infatti, incitato dalle domande di Bonnefoy, parla dello scrivere come “rovescio del ricamo”, cioè di quel modo in cui corpo e linguaggio tentano di aderire l’un l’altro nella radicale differenza che li separa.
[…]

Affiche (S2)

 

Collège International de Philosophie
Séminaire de recherche et d’enseignement
sous la direction de Orazio Irrera et Matthieu Renault

Race et colonialisme. Sur les épistémologies de la décolonisation

[Editor: Update 14 April 2026. See list of seminars 2011-2017]

SĂ©minaire organisĂ© en collaboration avec l’UniversitĂ© Paris-Est CrĂ©teil – EA4395 LIS,
la revue materiali foucaultiani et avec le soutien du Centre Parisien d’Études Critiques

Deuxième Séance

Lundi 14 octobre 2013 ; 18h30-20h30
Centre Parisien d’Études Critiques
(37 bis rue du Sentier, 75002 Paris : métro Bonne Nouvelle)

Le racisme et la question coloniale chez Deleuze et Foucault
< b>Guillaume Sibertin-Blanc (UniversitĂ© de Toulouse II – Le Mirail)
Schizo-analyse et décolonisation de l’inconscient

Orazio Irrera
Racisme et colonialisme chez et Ă  partir de Michel Foucault

Ondrej Ditrych, From discourse to dispositif: States and terrorism between Marseille and 9/11 (2013) Security Dialogue, 44 (3), pp. 223-240.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0967010613484076

Abstract
This article is a historical study of how states have articulated statements about terrorism since the 1930s; under what conditions these statements have been articulated; and what effects the discourses made up of these statements have had on global politics. This includes the constitutive role of the present discourse on what is posited as a terrorism dispositif. The inquiry is inspired by Foucault’s historical method, and comprises the descriptive archaeological analytic focused on the order of the discourse (including basic discourses in which the terrorist subject is constituted) and the genealogical power analysis of external conditions of emergence and variation of discursive series, whose treatment benefits also from Carl Schmitt’s concept of the nomos.

Author Keywords
discourse; Foucault; genealogy; nomos; Schmitt; terrorism

Carla Edgley, A genealogy of accounting materiality, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, Volume 25, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 255-271
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.06.001

Abstract
This study explores the relevance of the historical dimensions of the materiality concept and its past role. Metaphors applied to materiality provide insights into conditions and traces of power that have shaped its discursive configuration. Rather than viewing materiality as the gradual development of a technical idea over time, metaphorical discourses suggest that it has been constituted as multiple categories of knowledge, with divergent roles, as: a moral responsibility; a solution to the problem of over-auditing; a solid epistemic foundation for financial reporting; a scientific technique; a quantitative rule of thumb; a risk management concept; and a mysterious shield. The malleable nature of the concept has allowed the profession to realign and reinvent it to meet shifting priorities and challenges. Divergence in the trajectories of materiality discourses is relative to certain conditions, events, actors and financial scandals. The paper draws on the metaphor of performance, to interpret materiality as a performative activity at the crux of truth games about making visible, controlling, taming, managing and hiding translation errors in accounting inscriptions. The extent to which a genealogical analysis identifies different styles of reasoning that have shaped its meaning over time has implications for debate about its future development.

Author Keywords
Critical; Foucault; Genealogy; Materiality; Social

Paul Veyne Ă  propos de Michel Foucault

Emission
Le cercle de minuit France 2 (television), 22 juin 1994

Dans son Ă©mission consacrĂ©e au philosophe Michel FOUCAULT, Michel FIELD reçoit Paul VEYNE, professeur au Collège de France. L’historien parle de la vie de salon très agrĂ©able que Michel FOUCAULT avait recréée et de l’influence que le philosophe a eu sur lui.