Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Michel Foucault (1926 – 1984): les arts & les lettres/arts & humanities in the 21st Century

Peter Wall Institute for Advanced Studies & Collège de France Symposium
L’Institut d’études avancées de Paris
17 quai d’Anjou, Paris 75004
June 12 – 13, 2014

Conference website
PDF flyer

Art and architectural history, visual culture, literary studies, media and film studies and aesthetics have all “partaken” of Foucauldian theories, but a comparative exploration of Foucault’s significance has been lacking. If the reception of Foucault has focused on single disciplines and discrete areas of thought, it has also differed across specific linguistic and/or geo-political lines. This colloquium seeks to map the philosophy of Foucault as it impacts the future of the arts and humanities across cultures, institutions and practices.

Participants

Catherine M. Soussloff,
Art History, Visual Art & Theory, University of British Columbia, Canada

Dana Arnold
Architectural History & Theory, Middlesex University, UK

Sophie Berrebi
Art History, University of Amsterdam

Edward Dimendberg
Film and Media Studies, University of California, Irvine, U.S.A.

Françoise Gaillard
Literary Criticism, Art and Intellectual History, Université de Paris VII

Sima Godfrey
French Literature, University of British Columbia, Canada

Fréderic Gros
Philosophie politique, Université de Paris XII

Anton Lee
Art History, University of British Columbia, Canada

Ilka Kressner
Hispanic and Italian Studies, University at Albany, SUNY

Frédéric Pouillaude
Philosophie de l’art, Université de Paris-Sorbonne

Marisa C. Sánchez
Art History, University of British Columbia, Canada

Ariana Sforzini
Philosophie politique, Université de Paris XII

Michael Sheringham
French Literature, Oxford University, UK

T’ai Smith
Art History, Visual Art & Theory, University of British Columbia, Canada

Elisabetta Villari
DIRAAS, Università degli Studi di Genova

Séminaire “Politiques de Foucault”,
6e séance : Luca Paltrinieri, 17 mai 2014, Paris Ouest

webpage

La prochaine séance du séminaire “Politiques de Foucault” accueillera Luca Paltrinieri. Il interviendra sur le thème “’Ou la population ou les classes’ : l’archéologie foucaldienne du débat Marx-Malthus”.

Présentation de la séance  :

“Malthus a mis clairement au centre de la réflexion de l’économie politique moderne la question bio-économique de la population. La sienne est une réponse à l’optimisme des Lumières quant aux régulations possibles du rapport entre population et ressources : à la perfectibilité de la nature humaine de Godwin et Condorcet, Malthus oppose l’obstacle de la loi naturelle de population prescrivant le conflit entre croissance géométrique de la population et croissance arithmétique des subsistances. Par le concept de « surpopulation relative », Marx et Engels ont montré en revanche qu’il n’y a pas de loi naturelle qui règle les rapports entre démographie et économie : la loi de population n’est pas une constante qui fait entrer en contradiction deux progressions naturelles, elle est le produit variable de conditions historiques et notamment, dans le capitalisme, de la surexploitation de la force de travail. Ainsi, derrière la « loi naturelle de la population » se cachent des rapports de classe et, selon les mots de Marx « la population est une abstraction si je néglige les classes dont elle se compose ».

Nous partirons de cette critique marxienne de Malthus pour montrer que la perspective de la gouvernementalité foucaldienne en représente quelque part l’archéologie. Se concentrant sur les théories prémalthusiennes, Foucault tente en effet de gagner un autre point de vue sur la question : ni simple « nature », ni artefact idéologique, la population des Lumières est un ensemble de comportements intotalisables, étrange sujet/objet dont la nature politique la situe pourtant en radicale discontinuité par rapport aux théories de la souveraineté. Son émergence manifeste l’avènement d’un régime gouvernemental où la question du pouvoir ne peut plus être posée dans les termes classique de l’obéissance/désobéissance individuelle, mais impose de repenser les conditions même de (re)production d’une collectivité humaine.

Membre du Collège International de Philosophie, Luca Paltrinieri est directeur du programme De la gestion à l’autogestion. Une généalogie politique de l’entreprise.

Date :
Samedi 17 mai 2014, 10h-12h

Lieu :
Université Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense
bâtiment D, salle 04 (rez-de-chaussée)
Comment venir ? par le train et le RER
Plan du campus de Paris Ouest Nanterre La Défense

Comité d’organisation :
Philippe Combessie
Stéphane Dufoix
Stéphane Haber
Christian Laval
Christian Lazzeri
Emmanuel Renault

Ann Lazarsfeld-Jensen,
A Foucauldian journey into the islands of the deaf and blind
(2014) Social Identities, Published online March 2014

https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2014.893816

Abstract
This autoethnographic study integrates Foucault’s genealogical approach to explore disability, notably deafness and blindness, from historical, social, and personal perspectives. Disability as a modern institution is defined through nuances of language and silence so that power constructs are hidden and continue to evolve through social collusion. Multiple modern circumlocutions intensify the sense of dislocation, emphasising the difference it attempts to conceal, which makes disability a ripe field for ethnographic work. The two men studied, Blind Brewster and Deaf Brewster, led creative working lives that found a small place in history. Both were sustained by a deep piety. The language used to hide disability in the contemporary world is more destructive than protective, in comparison with the blunt labelling of the deaf and blind two hundred years ago when it was a point of distinction, not discrimination.

Author Keywords
autoethnography; blind; deaf; Foucault; genealogy

Chueh, H.-C., Chen, Y.-T.
Social Involvement: Deconstructing practices relating to the formation of students who work with autistic children in a university service-learning course
(2014) Educational Philosophy and Theory, Published online March 2014

Abstract
Participation in service-learning courses has always been considered a part of the informal education in tertiary education worldwide. Originating from the assumption that service-learning courses increase students’ civic engagement and bridge the gap between knowledge and practice, service-learning courses have gradually acquired the status of compulsory courses at universities. This being as it may be, it would seem that the nature of such courses would benefit from further analysis and discussion regarding their function in knowledge reproduction, and their role in teaching and education. The aim of this article is to examine and analyze a university service-learning course-the National Taiwan University (NTU) Star-Rain course with a commitment to serving children with autism-from a Foucaultian perspective, and reflect on how the process of putting knowledge during a service-learning course into practice comes to constitute the subjectivity of students who work with children who are autistic. We argue that the course under investigation has, in effect, become wholly entangled in the medical system’s treatment of autism in Taiwan. The service-learning process involves knowledge acquisition as well as long-term, detailed, concrete hands-on experience, and shapes, in a very complete way, students’ construction of their subject knowledge of autism.

Author Keywords
civic engagement; Foucault; service-learning course; students who work with autism; subjectivity

DOI: 10.1080/00131857.2013.828581

The State of Things

This videoed lecture by Leo Bersani held on 2 June 2011 at the Istituto Veneto di Scienze, Lettere ed Arti in Venice is the second public lecture of the programme ‘The State of Things’, commissioned by the Office for Contemporary Art Norway and organised by its director, Marta Kuzma and OCA’s associate curator, Pablo Lafuente, together with Peter Osborne, director of the Centre for Research in Modern European Philosophy at Kingston University in London.

With this lecture, titled Illegitimacy, Leo Bersani — referring to Bourdieu, Jean Genet and Todd Haynes’s film Safe — attempts to examine strategies of negativity as pre-conditions for inventing what Michel Foucault called ‘new relational modes’.

Call for Papers

A day-long workshop on the topic (with a view to an edited volume)

“Crisis and Reconfigurations: 100 years of European Thought Since 1914”

November 7 2014, Deakin Melbourne City Campus, Australia

An event hosted by the European Philosophy and History of Ideas Research Centre http://www.deakin.edu.au/arts-ed/centre-for-citizenship-and-globalisation/research/thematic-research-groups/ephi and the School of Humanities and Social Sciences

Keynote speaker:

William Altman, author of The German Stranger: Leo Strauss and National Socialism, Martin Heidegger and the First World War: Being and Time as Funeral Oration, Nietzsche: Philosopher of the Second Reich, and Plato the Teacher, the Crisis of the Republic

Overview

August 2014 marks 100 years since the outbreak of the first global war, and the beginning of what some historians have called a second ‘30 years’ war.’  The 1914 war itself, then the Russian revolutions of 1917, a contested peace after 1918, accelerating economic crises, the rise of fascism in Spain, Italy, then Germany, the systematic atrocities committed under these regimes, and the division of the world into the two blocs of the cold war following 1945 profoundly shocked European consciousness and culture.  Many philosophers and thinkers, like Hannah Arendt, argued that there had been an irreversible breach in the continuing traditions of the West.  Many others took these crises as proof positive of the redundancy, or culpability, of the ideals of the 18th and 19th centuries, centring around notions of progress, the beneficence of scientific advance, and the overcoming or taming of natural necessity.  In academic philosophy, this period saw the opening up of the gulf between angloamerican, analytic and ‘continental’ modes of philosophising, a distinction which still has real currency today.  Within European thought, while German post-war thinking largely saw a profound shift away from the figures of Nietzsche, Schmitt and Heidegger, held to have been implicated in their national disaster; in French thought, following 1960, Nietzschean and Heideggerian thought had a huge say in shaping the post-structuralist generation of thinkers whose wider influence around the world, and across disciplinary boundaries, is still felt today.  Differently, the need to avoid any perceived proximities to the oppressive statism of the National Socialist and Stalinist regimes has had a huge role to play, via Hayek, Friedman and others in the economic thought that has widely reshaped the international economic and political landscape since 1979.  This CFP calls for contributions to this workshop (with a view to an edited volume) on and around the hypothesis that European thought since 1914 has been decisively shaped, in both its strengths and weaknesses, by the political, cultural, economic and human crises inaugurated 100 years ago this year.  Possible areas of special interest may be:

– the political and historical context of the analytic-continental divide in philosophy

– the possible shaping force of the European catastrophe in philosophical thinking, rhetoric, modes of argumentation and self-perception

– the role of debates concerning Soviet and Maoist forms of Marxism in wider philosophical and political thought

– the role of reactionary thought in European ideas since 1914, and the centrality of the “crisis” motif

– the motif of a ‘return to the Greeks/Romans/theologians’ in post-1914 European thought

– the influence of theological, and contrastingly, classical motifs inpost-1914 European thinkers’ works

– the oeuvres of particular leading European thinkers, as inflected by the political and cultural crises of the first half of the 20th century.

– what are the future directions for philosophical thought, beyond the attempts to mourn and comprehend the crises set in chain by 1914?

 

People interested in contributing a paper to this event should send a 300-800 word abstract to msharpe@deakin.edu.au or jack.reynolds@deakin.edu.au.   Deadline: 30 May 2014.

Affiche A3PDF of poster

PDF of flyer

foucault-nowJames Faubion (Editor), Foucault Now, Polity, February 2014

ISBN: 978-0-7456-6378-4
232 pages

Publisher’s page

Description

Michel Foucault is recognized as one of the twentieth century’s most influential thinkers, however the authors in this volume contend that more use can be made of Foucault than has yet been done and that some of the uses to which Foucault has so far been put run the risk of and occasionally simply amount to misuse.This interdisciplinary volume brings together a group of esteemed scholars, recognized for their command of and insights into Foucault’s oeuvre. They demonstrate the many respects in which Foucault’s project of an ontology of the present remains vital and continues to yield compelling insights and show that an ontology of the present is restricted to no particular terrain, but instead ranges widely and on paths that frequently intersect.The essays in this much-needed new collection address the key components of Foucault’s thought, ranging from his approach to power, biopolitics and parrhesia to analysis of key texts such as Folie et Déraison and Histoire de la sexualité.

This collection will spark debate amongst students and scholars alike and demonstrates that that every further encounter with Foucault’s corpus is more likely than not to demand a revisiting of interpretations already formulated, conclusions already drawn, uses already devised.

  • Interdisciplinary volume that addresses key themes of Foucault’s thought, including biopolitics and parrhesia
  • Provides analysis of key texts such as ‘Folie et Deraison’ and ‘Histoire de la sexualite’
  • Features innovative contributions from leading Foucault scholars such as Didier Eribon, Ian Hacking and Cary Wolfe
  • Contributors argue that Foucault’s thought demands a revisiting of previously-drawn interpretations

Contributors include Didier Eribon, Eric Fassin, John Forrester, Ian Hacking, Lynne Huffer, Colin Koopman, James Laidlaw, Laurence McFalls, Mariella Pandolfi, Paul Rabinow and Cary Wolfe.

Editor Information
James Faubion is professor of anthropology at Rice University. His previous publications include “Foucault’s Genealogy of Ethics,” in A Companion to Moral Anthropology, edited by Didier Fassin (Wiley, 2012) and An Anthropology of Ethics (Cambridge, 2011) with George Marcus, ed.
Reviews

“No thinker of the last generation helped shape understandings of the world more powerfully than Foucault. This splendid and up-to-date anthology shows that his work, through its various phases, retains its analytic power today.”
Simon During, University of Queensland

“Now is an appropriate time to reassess Foucault’s work, to reflect upon its significance, relevance, and impact. These wide-ranging and challenging essays by leading figures in the field demonstrate the extraordinary breadth and depth of Foucault’s contribution to the social sciences and humanities.”
Barry Smart, University of Portsmouth

Foucault Now shows that ‘Foucault then’ is as relevant today as ever he was. The essays collected here traverse the full range of Foucault’s work. In situating his concerns and methods within the politics of his times, they also connect them to the politics of the present with a compelling urgency. Foucault’s originality still astonishes, and he remains simply indispensable.”
Tony Bennett, University of Western Sydney

Henning, A.D.
(Self-)Surveillance, anti-doping, and health in non-elite road running
(2014) Surveillance and Society, 11 (4), pp. 494-507.

Further info

Abstract

This article explores disciplining effects of current anti-doping surveillance systems on the health consequences of non-elites’ daily behaviors and habits. As they are left out of direct anti-doping testing and enforcement, it is tempting to argue non-elites are unaffected by the anti-doping efforts focused on the elite level of their sport. However, it is because they are not subject to antidoping surveillance systems nor forced to comply with anti-doping regulations that non-elites are implicated within the wider arena of disciplinary power that envelops both elite and non-elite athletes and anti-doping agencies (Foucault 1979). Drawing on data from 28 interviews with non-elite runners, I argue these runners do conform to the rules and norms of their sport as far as they understand them, but their knowledge of banned substances is inadequate and many non-elite runners have only a superficial and sometimes incorrect understanding of doping. Many view doping and its associated health risks as a problem only of elite running, as well as a problem limited to only a handful of widely publicized performance enhancing drugs or doping methods. As a result of these misunderstandings non-elite runners are vulnerable to negative health effects of over the counter (OTC) medications and nutritional supplements, which they view as “safe” and part of normal training as a result of the current elite surveillance model of anti-doping. The recent death of a non-elite marathon runner linked to use of the unregulated energy supplement DMAA demonstrates that questionable products are used by runners who may not be fully aware of the risks of use,

Parker, I.
Madness and justice
(2014) Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 34 (1), pp. 28-40.


Abstract

This article makes the case for “social justice” in relation to the conceptions of “madness” that currently operate in mental health practice. The argument proceeds in eight steps which challenge dominant views of “madness” in the discipline of psychology. Each of these eight steps is linked to the question of social justice. The first step concerns the irresolvable differences between “models” of madness, with a focus here on four mainstream models: the psychiatric medical model, psychoanalytic conceptions of “psychosis,” systemic interventions into family systems, and cognitive-behavioral therapy approaches. The second step concerns the differences internal to each of these models. In the third step I identify a fifth “model” which is usually occluded in psychological debate, the model madness elaborates of itself. The article then turns to the social conditions that structure different models of madness. Step four of the argument is to emphasize the way that models of madness are embedded in structures of power and point five steps back to the historical separation of reason from unreason as condition of possibility for “madness” as such to be configured as object of psychology. Step six is concerned with the “madness” of contemporary social reality, and step seven with the way that this socially structured madness informs clinical practice. The eighth step is to draw attention to already-existing alternative social practices; social justice in action organized by and for the mental health system user and survivor movements.

Author Keywords
Foucault; Madness; Marxism; Psychosis; Social justice

DOI: 10.1037/a0032841