Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Jun, M.
The Creation of a Docile Body: What Makes the Practice of Chhaupadi Persistent?
(2022) Asian Women, 38 (1), pp. 107-126.

DOI: 10.14431/aw.2022.3.38.1.107

Abstract
Chhaupadi is a Nepalese patriarchal custom that prohibits menstruating women from participating in daily routines, such as entering houses and temples, touching living plants, cattle, and taps, and eating dairy products. This has led to a number of unfavorable outcomes that threaten the health and safety of women and their babies, leading to it being officially outlawed in 2005. Despite this, the practice persists. Through in-depth interviews with 11 women from a small village in Dhanshingpur, where all residents continue to follow the rules of chhaupadi, this paper explores the complicated mechanisms that maintain the practice of chhaupadi and how it is being reasoned and regulated. In doing so, the paper grounds its discussions in Foucault’s conceptualizations of power, ultimately arguing that power can continue to compel compliance with illegal practices through self-regulation and the effect of community surveillance. © 2022, Research Institute of Asian Women. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords
biopower; chhaupadi; Foucault; menstruation taboo; self-discipline

Psychiatrie et politique dans la France d’Après-guerre. Présentation d’ouvrage (2022)

8 June 2022

Shai Gortler, The sumud within: Walid Daka’s abolitionist decolonization. Contemporary Polital Theory (2022).
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-021-00537-2

Abstract
The texts of Walid Daka, a Palestinian political prisoner incarcerated since 1986, challenge the notion that colonial power ends with decolonization and expose the shortcomings of examining colonial prisons solely through the eliminatory prism of death and deprivation. Studying Daka’s texts, the article presents how the Israeli carceral system has managed to utilize prisoners’ hopes and longings – in their relations with one another, their political actions such as hunger strikes or their building of internal leadership hierarchies, and their affective worlds – to further its own goals. Rather than a pessimistic account, this article critically analyzes Daka’s writings to demonstrate how a first-person study of carceral subjectification can unfold within an activist framework. Daka uses these observations to develop an alternative articulation of decolonization that I term ‘abolitionist decolonization’ as a collective and continued insistence on setting the terms of getting free. By ‘abolitionist decolonization,’ I conjure a difficult conversation between a Fanonian project of never-ending decolonization and a Foucauldian project of never-ending abolition. As such, this critical attitude aims to counter settler-colonial carcerality in ways that will foil the administration’s attempts to reproduce the dangers that the prisoners seek to elude, through the very means they deploy to elude them.

Shai Gortler, (2022). Participatory panopticon: Thomas Mott Osborne’s prison democracy. Constellations, 00, 1– 16.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12641
Open access

Thomas Mott Osborne’s early-20th-century experiment in prison democracy shows us how domination can be disguised as participation. Osborne knew a thing or two about disguise. As the mayor of Auburn, NY, he would go about his business in disguise to eavesdrop on citizens’ conversations. When the Governor of New York asked him to prepare railroad reform recommendations, Osborne dressed as a “hobo” and snuck onto trains. As a cautionary measure, he had “TMO, Auburn, NY” tattooed on his arm so that he could be identified in case of an accident and he did, indeed, die in costume, in 1926 (Chamberlain, 1935; Tannenbaum, 1933).

[…]
Foucault’s conceptualization of productive power is key to questioning how a person’s actions, even if participatory, can be used to extend control over them. Discipline and Punish (1977) differentiates between subjection (sujétion) as the mere use of force versus subjectification (assujettissement) as subject formation that relies on the subject’s action. For this reason, Discipline and Punish is central to the proposal presented here to reevaluate participatory practices. Yet, to achieve this goal also requires revisiting Foucault’s work. Despite the framing of Discipline and Punish around principles of productive power, the book’s periodization (roughly 1790−1830) leads it to focus on penological theories that left little room for incarcerated people’s actions or interrelations. If Foucault suggests that we utilize Bentham’s panopticon design to locate “panopticism” as a “generalizable model of functioning” (Foucault, 1977, p. 205), then reading Osborne’s participatory panopticon reveals even more sophisticated control mechanisms.
[…]

Macherey, Pierre. “Did Foucault Find a ‘Way Out’ of Hegel?” Theory, Culture & Society, (June 2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221084903.

Abstract
A ‘way out’ expresses a movement which looks completely different depending on whether one views it prospectively or retrospectively: in the first instance, it signifies ‘to emerge from’, which suggests a relationship of continuity; in the second it signifies ‘to breach a threshold’, a distancing, that is to say, a rupture. Which of these two meanings should we ascribe to the expression ‘Foucault’s way out of Hegel’ – that of a connection, which emerges when we look behind us, or that of a disjunction, which appears when we look ahead? That of a line of descent, which obliges us to contend with a legacy, or that of rejection, thus a refusal to accept it? This is the very question that we want to confront.

Keywords
dialectic, Foucault, Hegel, subjectification, thought

Hansen, M.P., Triantafillou, P.
Methodological reflections on Foucauldian analyses: Adopting the pointers of curiosity, nominalism, conceptual grounding and exemplarity
(2022) European Journal of Social Theory

DOI: 10.1177/13684310221078926

Abstract
This article seeks to provide a set of pointers for methodological reflections on Foucauldian-inspired analyses of the exercise of power. Michel Foucault deliberately eschewed methodological schemata, which may be why so little has been written on the methodological implications of his analyses. While this article shares the premise that we should refrain from a standardized methodology, it argues that providing broad pointers for analyses informed by the critical ambition and conceptual framework offered by Foucault is both desirable and possible. The article then offers some reflections and general guidelines on how to strengthen the methodological quality of Foucauldian analyses. We argue that the quality of Foucauldian-inspired analysis of modern power may gain from methodological reflections around four pointers: curiosity, nominalism, conceptual grounding and exemplarity. © The Author(s) 2022.

Author Keywords
Critique; genealogy; method; Michel Foucault; relativism

The legacy of deconstructivism “makes me want to retreat to the back of the room” says Bernard Tschumi
Tom Ravenscroft | Dezeen, 23 May 2022

Bernard Tschumi designed the seminal Parc de la Villette in Paris. Photo by Peter Mauss

Deconstructivism was built on intellectual rigour and a desire for exploration that contemporary architects do not share, says French-Swiss architect Bernard Tschumi in this exclusive interview as part of our series on the style.

According to Tschumi, who was one of the seven architects featured in the seminal Deconstructivist Architecture show at the Museum of Modern Art (MoMA), deconstructivism had a serious intellectual ideology that was developed by young architects reinvestigating avant-garde architecture from the 1920s.
[…]

Bernard Tschumi:
To simplify these were neo modernism versus postmodernism. And both were fairly excessive. You may remember names of course, like [Robert] Venturi and [Aldo] Rossi and a few others on one side, and people who believed in the roots of all the modern movements.

The younger generation, very much based around the AA in London, were not interested in either neo-modernism or postmodernism – because they felt it was a tired discourse.

We explored things in an intuitive and spontaneous manner. We had something in common, an interest in early 20th-century avant-garde. Not the official modernism, but surrealism, futurism, constructivism and expressionism in cinema. We felt that there was still something that had not been fully explored.

There were at least a couple of people who read a little more than the others. People who were more interested in the history of ideas. Eisenman and myself had come across the concept of deconstruction – not only Jacques Derrida, but a lot of French philosophers – [Michel] Foucault and [Roland] Barthes.
[…]

Mills, J.P., Gearity, B., Kuklick, C., Bible, J.
Making Foucault coach: turning post-structural assumptions into coaching praxis
(2022) Sports Coaching Review

DOI: 10.1080/21640629.2022.2057696

Abstract
Foucauldian-inspired coaching practices have been a recent focus in the Foucauldian coaching studies literature. There can be no denying the emergence of a number of ethical coaching practices in synergy with Foucault’s work, yet in most coaches’ everyday practices there appears to have been little uptake. Accordingly, our central concern in this paper is considering how Foucault’s work could become a more deliberate feature of coaching. Using Thomas Kuhn’s concept of paradigms, we argue that more significant change is yet to occur because coach education does not include the post-structural paradigmatic assumptions underpinning Foucault’s work. As a result, coaches immersed in a modern disciplinary logic may interpret Foucauldian-inspired practices through incommensurable assumptions. In this paper, we develop numerous post-structural assumptions into coaching post-structural praxis (CPSP) to demonstrate what those assumptions mean for coaches’ knowledge and practice. © 2022 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Author Keywords
Kuhn; paradigms; post structural; praxis; theory

Salinas-Arreortua, L.A., Alcantar-García, E.A.
Reflexions on public space from disciplinary and regulatory mechanisms statement by Foucault [Reflexiones sobre el espacio público desde los mecanismos disciplinarios y de regulación enunciados por Foucault]
(2022) Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 34 (2), pp. 817-834.

DOI: 10.5209/aris.75811

Abstract
Public space, understood as a space for socialization and construction of critical debates in the face of different problems, has been discussed from different theoretical perspectives that indicate its complexity, problems and importance, and even its extinction in the neoliberal context. However, there have been few works from Latin American literature that analyze certain behaviors and the depoliticization of public space based on the disciplinary and regulatory mechanisms exposed by Michael Foucault. Through a theoretical review of the concepts of biopolitics and public space, it is highlighted that various urban interventions have had an impact on disciplining the individual in the use and appropriation of public space and in the control of the population, through self-government, that emanates from society itself as it regulates behaviors. In this way, it is argued that the analysis of public space from biopolitics allows us to understand the why of certain behaviors, as well as the neutralization of the political character. © 2022 Universidad Complutense de Madrid. All rights reserved.

Author Keywords
Biopolitics; Depolitization; Foucault; Power; Public space

Janaína Quinzen Willrich, Luciane Prado Kantorski, Ariane da Cruz Guedes, Carmen Terezinha Leal Argiles, Marta Solange Streicher, Janelli da Silva, Dariane Lima Portela,
The (mis)government in the COVID-19 pandemic and the psychosocial implications: discipline, subjection, and subjectivity
(2022) Revista da Escola de Enfermagem da USP.

DOI: 10.1590/1980-220X-REEUSP-2021-0550

Abstract
OBJECTIVE: to analyze the psychosocial implications arising from the COVID-19 pandemic, reported in online service, from the perspective of Michel Foucault’s concepts of biopower, biopolitics and governmentality.

METHOD: qualitative documental research, with analysis of medical records of users assisted in a therapeutic listening chat, between April and October 2020.

RESULTS: the data were organized into two themes: Governmentality in the COVID-19 pandemic and the production of psychosocial implications of anxiety and fear and Discipline and subjection in the COVID-19 pandemic: subjectivities marked by sadness and anguish. The first demonstrates that the “art of governing” in Brazil produced instabilities and uncertainties that influenced the production of fear of contamination/death/and non-access to treatment and anxiety. In the second theme, we can see how disciplinary control and biopolitical regulation are combined. In Brazil, an extremely unequal country, subjectivity and subjectivities marked by anguish, feelings of discouragement and sadness have been produced.

CONCLUSION: the exclusionary processes were deepened in the pandemic, with the exercise of a biopolitics that makes life precarious and produces psychological distress.

Index Keywords
anxiety, emotion, government, human, pandemic; Anxiety, COVID-19, Emotions, Government, Humans, Pandemics