Robin Hickman, Annika Mosser, Daniel Abendano, Yanliang Dong, Discourses on the Lower Thames Crossing: rationality or rationalisation?, Transport Policy, Available online 7 August 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2026.104348
Abstract:
This paper examines the Lower Thames Crossing in discursive terms, seeking to understand the multiple socially-constructed realities associated with the project. Nine in-depth interviews are carried out, with transport planners, academics and environmental activists, to examine the project in relation to the discursive formation, discursive practice, discursive meaning; and related concepts of truth, power/knowledge and ethics. The analysis finds that the project is rationalised and presented as the obvious technical solution, overlooking wider contestation and the lack of contribution towards environmental and social equity goals. This represents a process of depoliticisation, serving some interests over others, including using infrastructure provision for capital accumulation. Broader implications for transport planning are discussed, including how the process may align more effectively with public policy.
Keywords:
Lower Thames Crossing; depoliticisation; discourse; truth; power/knowledge; ethics
