Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Anne Brunon-Ernst, Utilitarian Biopolitics: Bentham, Foucault and Modern Power, Routledge, 2012

Description
The works of Foucault and Bentham have been regularly examined in isolation and in reference to Panopticon; or The Inspection House (1791), yet rarely has the relationship between the two philosophers been explored further. This study traces the full breadth of that relationship within the fields of sexuality, criminology, ethics, economics and governance. By drawing on a range of new source material, Brunon-Ernst presents a convincing reassessment of Foucault’s concept of biopolitics and uncovers the neglected continuities between utilitarian thinking and Foucaultian theory. not only does this study challenge our assumptions of Foucault and his intellectual formation, it offers a fascinating insight into the connections between eighteenth and twentieth-century intellectual thought.

I have created a Foucault News page on Facebook for those of you who may be interested in connecting to this blog through the Facebook network. The link can be found at http://www.facebook.com/FoucaultNews and is in the right hand side column of this blog.

 

The Writing & Society Research Centre and the Philosophy Research Initiative at University of Western Sydney, Australia presents following seminar on Wednesday July 4:

SPEAKER: Peter Gratton (Memorial University of Newfoundland)

TITLE: Spinoza and the Biopolitical Roots of Modernity

TIME: July 4, 3-5pm

PLACE: UWS Bankstown Campus, 3.G.55

ABSTRACT:
Much has been written about bio-political sovereignty in the wake of Giorgio Agamben’s work, which relies, at least in the first volume of Homo Sacer, on Carl Schmitt’s transcendental account of sovereignty. I will argue, however, that Foucault and Arendt rightly identify what Derrida once called the “changing shape and place of sovereignty” in modernity, which for them is horizontal and disseminated within a presupposed nation. For this reason, we will look to the source of modern philosophical immanentism, Spinoza, to show that he is not extrinsic to this modern bio-politics, and demonstrates how the sovereign exception and its nationalized version work hand-in-glove in the era of which he was a part. In this way, we argue that it is Spinoza’s political theology, not Schmitt’s, that is the better pass-key to what Foucault and Arendt identify as biopolitical. By doing so, I put in tension two trends in recent Continental philosophy–philosophical vitalism and the critique of biopolitics–while raising questions about the use of political, if not ontological, forms of immanence.

BIO:
Peter Gratton is a professor of Philosophy at the Memorial University of Newfoundland. He has published widely in political, Continental, and intercultural philosophy and is the author of The State of Sovereignty: Lessons from the Political Fictions of Modernity (SUNY Press, 2012) and Speculative Realism (Continuum, forthcoming). Co-Editor of the influential interdisciplinary journal Society and Space, executive board member of the North American Sartre Society and other national philosophical societies, and area editor for Africana philosophy for the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Peter has also edited Traversing the Imaginary (Northwestern University Press, 2007), co-edited with John Mannousakis, and Jean-Luc Nancy and Plural Thinking: Expositions of World, Politics, Art, and Sense (SUNY Press, 2012), co-edited with Marie-Eve Morin. Peter is currently a Research Fellow in the Humanities Centre at Australia National University.

For the entire 2012 program of the Philosophy seminar series at UWS see this page.

O’Byrne, P. (2012). “Population Health and Social Governance: Analyzing the Mainstream Incorporation of Ethnography”. Qualitative health research , 22 (6), pp. 859-67.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732311425049

Abstract
Recently, health care workers (researchers, academics, policy writers, clinicians) have begun to view ethnography as an acceptable research methodology for informing public health work. This corresponds with a change in public health practice toward population health, wherein identifiable groups are examined to identify the group-level and contextual factors that affect their health statuses. Although population health-based methodological and outcomes-focused examinations have already occurred regarding ethnography, no extant literature scrutinizes the incorporation of ethnography into mainstream public and population health work from a sociopolitical viewpoint. Consequently, such an investigation occurs here using Foucault’s concepts of discipline and Lupton’s advancement of Foucault’s ideas about the imperative of health. The outcome of this investigation is the assertion that ethnography is a strategic method for disciplining populations that do not respect the imperative of health. In other words, ethnography helps generate the data that can be used to normalize large groups of people.

Sakellariou, Dikaios (2012). “Sexuality and Disability: A Discussion on Care of the Self”. Sexuality and disability , 30 (2), p. 187-97.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-011-9219-3

Abstract
The aim of this article is to bring together the notions of sexuality, disability and care of the self. This is done by illustrating the importance of care of the self and technologies of the self in the context of sexuality and disability. This paper is partly based on empirical data from a phenomenological study on perspectives of sexuality of Greek men with spinal cord injury. In this article we shift the focus from care offered from one person to another, to self care. Foucault’s work on the care of the self is used as an analytical lens to consider care as a discourse, with associated ideas and practices. In the care of the self what is important is the degree to which chosen practices help people live life as they choose and construct the self they desire. Like everybody, disabled people need to experiment, trying out different technologies of the self and different sexual possibilities. Care of the self is about enactment of identities and choice of how to live one’s life. In other words, it is about control of one’s body, power to guide representations of oneself and access to choices.

stuartelden's avatarProgressive Geographies

Long out of print, Maladie mentale et personnalité was Foucault’s first book from 1954, reissued as Maladie mentale et psychologie in substantially revised form. It is freely available here.

View original post

Youatt, R. (2012). “Power, Pain, and the Interspecies Politics of Foie Gras”. Political research quarterly , 65 (2), pp. 346-58.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912911398049

Abstract
This article examines the practices, logics, and politics of foie gras production and consumption. It argues that scholars need to rethink both pain and sentience to account for the fact that ducks are responsive, and not just reactive. Rather than using the capacities of animals to judge when power relations between species are acceptable, it suggests that scholars should start with the power relations themselves to account for how animal and human experiences are made.

Collectif, « Michel Foucault. Entre sujet et révolte », Revue du MAUSS, 12 juin 2012 [en ligne].
Available for pdf download

Qu’a-t-on fait historiquement des fous et des folles, des pauvres et des malades ? Pourquoi faut-il constamment dire et se dire « qui » on est ? Comment gouverne-t-on ? À quel type de pouvoir avons-nous affaire ? Qu’est-ce que dire « vrai » ? Comment peut-on devenir sujet moral de son action ? Voici un certain nombre de questions foucaldiennes qu’il faut continuer à se poser et qui nous plongent dans l’analyse (l’analytique dirait Foucault) de nos pratiques concrètes prises entre les coercitions de la « nécessité » qu’on doit problématiser pour s’en débarrasser et les virtualités des « possibilités » qu’il faut identifier pour les saisir comme opportunités de transformation. Car, de même que Marx n’est pas seulement un penseur du nécessaire (de la détermination sociale) mais également du possible (de conditions possibles d’émancipation de cette détermination), Foucault est autant un penseur de l’assujettissement que de la subjectivation, du pouvoir que de sa fragilité, de la volonté de normalisation que des pratiques de liberté. Dans ce petit ouvrage, de jeunes chercheurs de l’Université du Québec à Montréal confrontent notamment Foucault à la critique du libéralisme d’Arendt, et prolongent ses analyses sur le cas de Facebook. (François Gauthier)

Entretien avec Arlette Farge

Arlette Farge worked with Foucault on Le Désordre des familles, lettres de cachet des Archives de la Bastille, Paris, Gallimard Julliard, 1982. See the Portail Michel Foucault for info and documents on this book

Rares sont les chercheurs auxquels il arrive de rencontrer des “fans” ; rares sont les auteurs de non-fiction dont on dévore les livres, tous les livres. Historienne du “peuple”, du “subalterne” et de tout ce que le XVIIIe siècle compte de dominés, Arlette Farge fait partie de ceux-là s’il en est. Depuis leur émergence des archives judiciaires jusqu’alors oubliées sous la poussière, sa plume et sa voix sont devenues familières aux habitués des librairies et aux auditeurs de France Culture. Poursuivant un parcours entamé par l’étude de la petite délinquance et de la vie fragile avant d’entreprendre plus récemment l’exploration des sons et des voix ouvrières de la capitale, Arlette Farge n’a eu de cesse d’aborder les corps populaires selon tous les angles offerts par les archives de la police et de la justice royales, imprégnées du grouillement des rues de Paris décidément bien éloignées des salons et des antichambres versaillaises. C’est donc un peu dans la fraîcheur pleine de vie de ces sources de la modernité populaire que nous poursuivons, avec Arlette Farge, nos considérations inactuelles sur la pratique des archives, l’engagement dans le passé du sujet historien et l’écriture de l’histoire.

SOMMAIRE:

1 – Archives – publié le 22 mai 2012

2 – Le Sujet de l’histoire – publié le 29 mai 2012

3 – Ecrire l’histoire – publié le 5 juin 2012

From the Ashgate Publishing blog.

The book edited by Anne Brunon Ernst Beyond Foucault: New Perspectives on Bentham’s Panopticon (details posted earlier on this blog) has been awarded ‘research-essential’ status by Baker & Taylor YBP Library Services.

In the introduction to Beyond Foucault Anne Brunon-Ernst includes a quote from Foucault:

Bentham is more important for the understanding of our society than Kant and Hegel

She continues:

Here, in one beguiling phrase, one finds the many contradictions which cluster around Jeremy Bentham’s legacy in Michel Foucault’s work. Foucault’s statement goes to the very heart of the subject-matter of this volume of essays: what did Foucault understand of Bentham’s philosophy, and to what extent was he influenced by Bentham’s utilitarianism?

You can read the full introduction here.