Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Bernard Harcourt, On critical genealogy. Contemporary Political Theory (2024).

https://doi.org/10.1057/s41296-024-00715-y

Open access

Abstract
Today most critical theorists who deploy history use a genealogical method forged by Nietzsche and Foucault. This genealogical approach now dominates historically inflected critique. But not all genealogical writings today, nor all philosophical debates surrounding genealogy, advance the goals of critical philosophy. It is crucial now that we assess the value of genealogical critiques. The proper metric against which to evaluate such work is whether it contributes to transforming ourselves, others, and society in a valuable way. In this article, I propose that we use the term “critical genealogy” to identify those genealogical practices that positively nourish our activity and, thereby, advance the ambition of critical philosophy.

Foucault Studies

Number 36: Special Issue: Foucault’s Legacy in Contemporary Thinking: Forty Years Later (1984-2024)

Editorial
Sverre Raffnsøe et al.

Special Issue: Foucault’s Legacy on Contemporary Thinking

Introduction: Foucault’s Legacy in Contemporary Thinking: Forty Years Later (1984-2024)
Valentina Antoniol, Stefano Marino

On Foucault’s Legacy: Governmentality, Critique and Subjectivation as Conceptual Tools for Understanding Neoliberalism
André Duarte, Maria Rita de Assis César

Thinking and Unthinking the Present: Philosophy after Foucault
Martin Saar, Frieder Vogelmann

The Actualité of Philosophy and its History: Michel Foucault’s Legacy on a Philosophy of the Present
Orazio Irrera

The Future Perfect of Suspicion and Prediction as a Dispositive of Security Today? The Legacy of Foucault (1977)
Didier Bigo

Who, in our present, might the Pierre Rivières be? Political Subjectivation and the Construction of a Collective “We”
Valentina Antoniol

Foucault and Ecology

Manlio Iofrida

Foucault and Somaesthetics: Variations on the Art of Living
Richard Shusterman

Overcoming “the Penetration Model”: Rethinking Sexuality with Foucault, Shusterman, and Contemporary Feminism

Stefano Marino

Power + Fashion
Adam Geczy, Vicki Karaminas

Discipline and Power in the Digital Age. Critical Reflections from Foucault’s Thought
Silvia Capodivacca, Gabriele Giacomini

Untruth as the New Democratic Ethos: Reading Michel Foucault’s Interpretation of Diogenes of Sinope’s True Life in the Time of Post-Truth Politics
Attasit Sittidumrong

Gaze and Norm: Foucault’s Legacy in Sociology
Dušan Marinković, Dušan Ristić

‘The Subject and Power’ – Four Decades Later: Tracing Foucault’s Evolving Concept of Subjectivation
Kaspar Villadsen

Pastoral Power, Sovereign Carelessness, and the Social Divisions of Care Work or: What Foucault Can Teach Us about the “Crisis of Care”
Lucile Richard

History, Markets, and Revolutions: Reviewing Foucault’s Contribution to the Analysis of Political Temporality
Alessandro Volpi, Alessio Porrino

A Critic on the Other Side of the Rhine? On the Appropriations of Foucault’s Political Thought by the Heirs of the Frankfurt School
Rodolpho Venturini

Genealogy as an Ethic of Self-determination: Husserl and Foucault

Enrico Redaelli

Foucault and Wittgenstein: Practical Critique and Democratic Politics
Lotar Rasiński

Articles

Foucault’s Hegel Thesis: The “Tragic Destiny” of Life and the “Being-There” of Consciousness
Oliver Roberts-Garratt

Luther and Biopower: Rethinking the Reformation with Foucault
Samuel Lindholm, Andrea Di Carlo

Vervoort, T.
How Does Neoliberalism Form Our Lifes? A Praxeological Approach with Jaeggi and Foucault (2024) Critical Horizons

DOI: 10.1080/14409917.2024.2390335

Abstract
Michel Foucault’s work has immensely enriched the way critical social theorists understand power. Beyond his work on disciplinary normalisation, Foucault’s genealogy of the modern state has discussed governmental power as the conduct of conduct of subjects and populations. Foucault reserves his understanding of norms and normalisation for explaining the prescriptive force of disciplinary power. Accordingly, he hardly uses the language of norms to explain how neoliberal policies interfere in social conduct. In this paper, I aim to elucidate what kind of normative intervention neoliberal governmentality encompasses. By mobilising Rahel Jaeggi’s understanding of forms of life as ensembles of normatively imbued social practices, I suggest that neoliberal governmentality introduces the rationality of market competition into the problem-solving horizon of social conduct, thereby creating and instituting a “neoliberal form of life”. Hence, I argue that neoliberal governmentality is a form of domination that intervenes in ethical norms and social practices that build everyday forms of life. © Critical Horizons Pty Ltd 2024.

Author Keywords
critique; forms of life; neoliberalism; norms; power

Grafton Tanner, Foreverism, Polity, 2023

Description
What do cinematic “universes,” cloud archiving, and voice cloning have in common? They’re in the business of foreverizing – the process of revitalizing things that have degraded, failed, or disappeared so that they can remain active in the present. To foreverize something is to reanimate it, to enclose and protect it from time and the elements, and to eradicate the feeling of nostalgia that accompanies loss. Foreverizing is a bulwark against instability, but it isn’t an infallible enterprise. That which is promised to last forever often does not, and that which is disposed of can sometimes last, disturbingly, forever.

In this groundbreaking book, American philosopher Grafton Tanner develops his theory of foreverism: an anti-nostalgic discourse that promises growth without change and life without loss. Engaging with pressing issues from the ecological impact of data storage to the rise of reboot culture, Tanner tracks the implications of a society averse to nostalgia and reveals the new weapons we have for eliminating it.

Extract

A nostalgic subject became, in the words of Foucault, “an individual to be corrected”: the one who is “regular in his irregularity” and who “appears to require correction because all the usual techniques, procedures and attempts at training… have failed to correct him”. (pp. 6-7)

About the Author
Grafton Tanner is a professor at the University of Georgia and the author of The Hours Have Lost Their Clock: The Politics of Nostalgia.

Geoghegan, Bernard Dionysius. Code: From Information Theory to French Theory. Duke University Press, 2023.

In Code Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization.

Fehr, Burkhard, and Panagiotis Roilos, eds. Mythogenesis, Interdiscursivity, Ritual. Studies Presented to Demetrios Yatromanolakis (Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004679740

The studies included in Mythogenesis, Interdiscursivity, Ritual. Studies Presented to Demetrios Yatromanolakis , a pioneering scholar— shed new light on a variety of areas: the encounters of ancient Greece with other societies and cultures in antiquity; the interplay between art (vase-painting and sculpture) and broader ideological developments/mentalities in antiquity; ritual in ancient Greek contexts; political ideologies and religion; history of scholarship, textual criticism/critical editing, and hermeneutics; the reception of myth and of archaic and classical Greek culture and philosophy in diverse discursive, mediatic, and sociocultural contexts — from impressionist painting, to modernism and the avant-garde, to Foucauldian thought.

Christopher O’Neill, Foucault And Information Theory: On “Message Or Noise?”, Parrhesia , 39 · 2024 · (1966)1-17

Extract
“Message or Noise?” is a short but highly suggestive essay, in which Michel Foucault takes up the question of medical thought and practice through the frame of information-theory – one of the few occasions throughout his enormous œuvre in which he directly engages with the question of the computational. Despite being included as text 44 of the Dits et Écrits, the piece has not before been translated into English, and has led a somewhat subterranean life within Foucault’s reception. Amidst a renewed interest in the impact of cybernetics and information theory on French structuralist and post-structuralist thought, and indeed within something of a neocybernetic turn in critical theory tout court, the significance of the piece comes into focus – even if Foucault’s analysis is perhaps conducted in an ambiguous or somewhat ironic frame. Here I establish the context of its publication, reception, and place in contemporary debates surrounding information theory in the French academy, especially in relation to the more anxious critique of information theory offered by Foucault’s mentor Georges Canguilhem. I also consider the significance of new archival resources which show Foucault was an attentive reader of developments in information theory and cybernetics from even very early in his career, and suggest some potential future research paths regarding Foucault and information theory towards which “Message or Noise?” gestures.

Michel Foucault, “Message or noise?”, Translated by Christopher O’Neill, Parrhesia 39 · 2024 · 18-24

Open access

Extract

In order to “situate” medicine amongst other forms of knowledge (savoir), we have become accustomed to the use of linear schemas. Above the level of the body, the soul; below the level of the organism, the tissues. Medicine then has tended at one end towards psychology, psychopathology, etc., and at the other to physiology. However, the discussions that I have been reading bring to light new, diagonal or lateral, relations. Certain problems arise in medicine which seem isomorphic to those that one might encounter elsewhere; especially in those disciplines which are either concerned with language, or which operate like a language. These disciplines have without doubt no “object relation” to medicine, but the latter, understood as theory-and-practice, is perhaps structurally analogous to them.

William Tilleczek, Between Authority and Care, Plato’s Crito as Defense of the Philosophical Life, Dionysius, Vol. 39 (2024)

Abstract
This paper addresses the question as to why Socrates stays to die in prison through a novel reading of the Crito oriented by the Foucaultian notion of care (epimeleia). It argues that the Laws do not speak for Socrates (the reasons they offer for staying in prison are not reasons he could have accepted). It then reconstructs the logos that did compel Socrates to stay, through a close reading attentive to the principles of philosophical judgment suggested but never fully elaborated in the Crito. Crito’s ethical and philosophical laxity prevent Socrates from fully converting him to the philosophical life via argument, so he adopts the authoritarian voice of the Laws to prevent Crito from making a dangerous judgement. This is a compromise but nonetheless an act of care: preserving his own commitment to philosophy despite pending death, Socrates also leaves intact for Crito a model of an intrinsically good life.

William Tilleczek Receives the 2024 Leo Strauss Award for “Powers of Practice: Michel Foucault and the Politics of Asceticism”, Political Science Now, August 9, 2024

The Leo Strauss Award is presented annually by the American Political Science Association (APSA) to honor the best doctoral dissertation in political philosophy.

Citation from the Award Committee:

Dr. Tilleczek’s “Powers of Practice: Michel Foucault and the Politics of Asceticism” is a meticulously crafted, exceptionally creative, deeply erudite, and beautifully written study of Foucault’s thought that recasts his contributions to contemporary analyses of neoliberalism and a politics of freedom. The dissertation’s accomplishments are noteworthy on several fronts. First, it offers a new approach to reading Foucault centered on his attentions to asceticism, understood not as a normative but rather a methodological framework that situates practices of ethical self-fashioning within their socio-political and interpersonal contexts. Joining a biographical account of Foucault with careful exegesis of his later writings on care of the self, Dr. Tilleczek elaborates a ‘general ascetology’ in which understanding power and agency as they pertain to practices of self-improvement remains a matter of historical anthropological investigation. Second, Dr. Tilleczek’s approach enables them to surface continuities between the different phases of Foucault’s work, persuasively showing how his ‘turn to antiquity’ recuperates his earlier account of discipline as a modern ascetological apparatus. Avoiding heavy-handed impositions of unity across Foucault’s corpus, Dr. Tilleczek makes their case through nuanced argumentation, deft interpretive analyses, and productively provocative intertextual readings. Third, Dr. Tilleczek’s account of Foucault’s general ascetology and the anthropology of ethics subtending it introduces rich resources, conceptual and hermeneutic, for understanding neoliberalism and its self-fashioning homo economicus. The dissertation demonstrates how self-optimization, as the generalized ‘practice imperative’ of a marketized society, both reproduces its social inequalities and cultivates forms of life that can subvert its modes of governance. Taken as a whole, “Powers of Practice” succeeds admirably not only in making significant contributions to our understanding of a pivotal and often divisive thinker but also in enabling us to ‘think (and see) what we are doing’ in the present from a fresh perspective.

William Tilleczek is a SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow at McGill University and L’Université de Montréal, where he is a member of the Research Group on Constitutional Studies and the Centre canadien d’études allemandes et européennes, respectively. Previously, he was a Visiting Professor at Deep Springs College.

Originally from Sudbury (ON), he studied in Halifax (NS) and Toronto (ON) before completing a PhD in Government at Harvard University.

His recent works are united by an interest in ascesis/training and touch on themes and thinkers such as Hannah Arendt, anti-colonial ethics, artificial intelligence, and the moralization of poverty. His first book project works with and beyond Foucault to intervene in current debates regarding the “old” (structuralist) and “new” (individualist) left. Combining insights from classical political philosophy, Marxism, Foucault, and post-colonial theory, he is working to sketch the contours of “the means of training” as a general political problem: How are citizens forced to train, invited to train, prohibited from training? Who has access to meaningful modes of self-transformation, who is forced to train their body as a tool for the gains of the dominant? How can we collectively shape institutions that enable the ascesis required to fulfill our ethical and political goals?

Will also works as a translator and has recently published an English version of Simone Weil’s “Rationalisation.”