Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Columbia Center for Contemporary Critical Thought
Columbia Global Centers/Europe
École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales

vous invitent à une
Journée d’étude

PDF of flyer

Mardi 2 Juin 2015

Premières lectures, premières réactions, et pistes de recherches 

Journée d’étude autours de M. Foucault, Théories et institutions pénales Cours au Collège de France 1972-1973

avec

Étienne Balibar ▪ Claude-Olivier Doron ▪ François Ewald ▪ Frédéric Gros ▪ Bernard Harcourt ▪ Robert Jacob ▪ Sacha Raoult ▪ Stephen Sawyer ▪ Arianna Sforzini ▪ Arnaud Teyssier ▪ Julien Théry

____

Columbia Global Centers/Europe

Reid Hall
4 rue de Chevreuse
75006 Paris
____

de 9 h à 18 h

Autour de Théories et institutions pénales (1972)
Journée d’études

9:00     Introduction – Bernard E. Harcourt, Columbia University/EHESS

9:10     Frédéric Gros, Sciences Po

10:00   Stephen W. Sawyer, American University in Paris

10:45   Pause

11:00 Table ronde: « Foucault et l’histoire » – Claude-Olivier Doron, Université Paris-Diderot

Robert Jacob, CNRS-Lamop
Julien Théry, Université Paul Valéry-Montpellier III
Arnaud Teyssier, ENA/ENS

13:00   Pause

14:00   François Ewald, Responsable de l’édition des cours de Michel Foucault au Collège de France

14:45   Panel : « Foucault, le droit pénal, et la théâtralisation »

Arianna Sforzini, Université Paris-Est Créteil
Sacha Raoult, Université Aix-Marseille
Bernard E. Harcourt, Columbia University/EHESS

16:00   Pause

16:15   Keynote: Étienne Balibar, Université Parix X/Columbia University

Joyce-cover150Michael Joyce, Foucault, in Winter, in the Linnaeus Garden, Starcherone Books, 2015

Publisher’s site.
Extract from the book on The Brooklyn Rail

See also a book trailer narrated by the author at the end of this post.

Michel Foucault famously wrote, “I am fully aware that I have never written anything other than fictions.” In this polylingual, operatic fantasy comprised of invented letters, most of them unsent, set in Sweden during February 1956 while Foucault was undergoing a Swedish winter, the philosopher finds himself not just researching, but living through, his work to come, Madness and Civilization.

“A lovely book, it gives us another approach to a real human being whose face drawn in sand has resisted his biographers as much as his body of work has resisted all conventional critical attempts at constructing a Bildungsroman, something that is just the opposite of what Joyce is doing here.” – Brian Lennon, author of In Babel’s Shadows

“Michel Foucault, demythologizer of reason and man, in an ecstatic mode, his erotic longings so blighted that lyricism has overcome him—I would call it unimaginable if Michael Joyce hadn’t imagined it. And the object of this compulsion, a debased angel whose French kiss, even in dead letters, mingles the tongues of Europe in one mouth. Foucault, in Winter, in the Linnaeus Garden is simply an achievement.” – R. M. Berry

“A winter’s dream of a novel, original and affecting. Foucault’s superbly imagined voice sings of love and madness and death and a boundless need to get at the root of that confounding species called homo sapiens. The liminal, polylingual prose is a tour-de-force, the erudition dazzles, the final snowlight at nightfall will haunt you.” – Paul Russell, author of The Unreal Life of Sergey Nabokov

“Joyce is part of a revolution in narrative form.”
– Newsweek

“Dawn it is, to be sure. The granddaddy of full-length hypertext fiction is Michael Joyce’s landmark Afternoon
– Robert Coover, The New York Times Book Review

Michael Joyce talks about his new novel from Starcherone Books. The novel is a polylingual, operatic fantasy comprised of invented letters, most of them unsent, set in Sweden during February 1956 while Foucault was undergoing a Swedish winter and in which the philosopher finds himself not just researching, but living through, his work to come, Madness and Civilization.

Michael Panser: Foucault und Öcalan (2015)
Macht und Wahrheit: Machtanalytik und nomadisches Denken als Fragmente einer Philosophie der Befreiung

Last Call for Abstracts

MANCEPT Workshops in Political Theory, 1-3 September 2015

‘Resistance and Power beyond Foucault’

Convener: Guilel Treiber, Institute of Philosophy, KU Leuven (Guilel.Treiber@hiw.kuleuven.be)

The nature of political power is changing. The state is no longer the only, or even the main player in the complex mechanisms of power structures at the beginning of the 21st century. Foucault’s oeuvre has a crucial role in analyzing these changes and emphasizing the productive element of power against the idea that power (and the state as its embodiment) fulfills a merely repressive function. Resistance, as a counter-part to power, is changing as well. However, the academic analysis of resistance has remained constrained within the framework of strike and protest, both essentially practices of resistance to repressive state power. What would be a resistance to a productive power, and what could the relation between the two be?

Resistance seems to refuse clear-cut conceptualization. This may be due to the plurality of possible ways in which one can conceive the term, but also to the contextual and practical character of resistance. In fact, resistance is always specific; it is, in other words, always resistance to something, within a certain historical framework. This has led to the development of a series of competing notions, from ‘deconstruction’ to ‘performativity’, from ‘counter-hegemony’ to ‘counter-conduct’, all of which aim at theorizing resistance and clarifying its relation to power. Additionally, empirical analysis of different forms of resistance remains painfully descriptive, avoiding a critical analysis and appraisal of its multiple new forms and practices.

Power and resistance are not two separate phenomena. If we accept Foucault’s analysis of power, even in its most basic intuition, that power is historically bound, then we will need to re-conceptualize resistance as a counter-power. This may mean that power and resistance do not stand in a merely ‘action-reaction’ relation to each other, whereby power is repressive and resistance liberating; or whereby power is predominant and resistance happens in the restrictive space that a totalizing form of power leaves. If we agree with Foucault, that resistance is as productive as power, what would be the implications on our understanding of politics, what forms would resistance then take?

This workshop aims at encouraging discussion between different perspectives on resistance and power (not exclusively limited to a Foucauldian perspective). Propositions engaged with one of the two following themes (or other related issue) are encouraged :

1) Resistance beyond the state: Protest and strike are heavily state-centered forms of resistance. They focus mainly on demands put to sovereign power. Can power be resisted in such a way? What would a resistance that does not focus on power as though it is emanating from one fixed point look like?

2) Different forms of resistance to power: Civil disobedience, whistle-blowing, ‘illegal’ forms of digital resistance such as Pirate Bay or Anonymous, veganism are all examples of contemporary resistance: are they inherently different from previous forms of resistance? Do they embody different ways to resist to different forms of power? What do they require from the individual or communities resisting?

Call for abstracts: Abstracts of about 400-600 words on all topics mentioned above for the MANCEPT workshops should be sent to Guilel.Treiber@hiw.kuleuven.be The deadline for submitting abstracts is JUNE 1st, 2015. Applicants will be informed about acceptance by JUNE 07, 2015. Final papers should be sent by August 2015 (date to be specified later), so that they are circulated between the workshop’s participants.

Diálogo sem Fronteira – Michel Foucault e a Revolução Iraniana (2015)
Broadcast on the TV Channel of the State University of Campinas.

Hodge, S.
Alienating curriculum work in Australian vocational education and training
(2015) Critical Studies in Education, 17 p. Article in Press.

DOI: 10.1080/17508487.2015.1009842

Abstract
Competency-based training (CBT) is a curriculum model employed in educational sectors, professions and industries around the world. A significant feature of the model is its permeability to control by interests outside education. In this article, a ‘Neoliberal’ version of CBT is described and analysed in the context of Australian Vocational Education and Training (VET). In this version of the model, a division of curriculum labour is instituted that, from the perspective of Neoliberal theory, allows the interests of educators to be limited in accordance with the belief that they will neglect the interests of students and other stakeholders if they have control over the whole curriculum construction process. But this version of CBT denigrates the expertise of educators by forcing them to set aside their own judgement about what is important to teach and implement a pre-existing picture of an occupation that may or may not be an effective representation. Empirical evidence is reviewed that suggests curriculum work in VET is indeed alienating for educators. Existing critiques of CBT are considered and found to have overlooked the specifically Neoliberal form of CBT in VET analysed in the article.

Author Keywords

adult education; curriculum; Foucault; teachers’ work and identities; vocational education and training

This video accompanies the petition for a Michel Foucault chair in Brazil. It is a performance in French and Portuguese of an imagined response by Foucault addressed to the Cardinal and Bishops who voted not to authorise the establishment of the Chair.

Serge Audier, Penser le « néolibéralisme ». Le moment néolibéral, Foucault, et la crise du socialisme, Lormont, Le Bord de l’eau, coll. « Documents », 2015, 570 p., ISBN : 9782356874030.


Further Info

Qu’est-ce vraiment que le néolibéralisme ? Et comment en sortir ?

Pour répondre à ces questions, il peut être utile d’élucider d’abord le sens du basculement néolibéral que le monde a connu depuis la fin des années 1970.

Il se trouve que c’est précisément durant cette période, en 1979, que Michel Foucault devait prononcer au Collège de France quelques leçons sur le néolibéralisme appelées à connaître bien plus tard un succès fulgurant. Depuis, un flot ininterrompu de publications ne cesse de célébrer en Foucault le grand prophète du néolibéralisme.

Pour beaucoup, tout a été déjà dit sur l’essence de la « rationalité néolibérale » dans ces leçons géniales qui ont parfaitement su anticiper notre monde, celui de la mise en concurrence de tous contre tous et d’une nouvelle conception de l’individu comme entreprise.

Pourtant, des doutes subsistent. Est-on si sûr que Foucault voyait la société néolibérale comme un cauchemar dont il fallait sortir d’urgence ? Sa relation au libéralisme et au néolibéralisme n’était-elle pas autrement complexe, alors qu’il multipliait à la même époque les critiques contre le marxisme et le socialisme ? Il se pourrait que sa pensée sur le sujet soit plus subtile – ou troublante – qu’on ne l’imagine généralement.

Ce livre, qui dresse un tableau des transformations de la vie intellectuelle française de la fin des années 1970, affronte la fausse transparence de ces cours en vérité ambigus et énigmatiques, pour reprendre les interrogations stimulantes de Foucault. Car même si l’on ne partage pas ses réponses présumées, les questions qu’il a posées restent essentielles dans le moment que nous vivons : qu’est-ce que le néolibéralisme ? Le socialisme survivra-t-il à son assaut, ou doit-il se réinventer entièrement ?

Serge Audier
Serge Audier, philosophe, est maître de conférences à l’Université-Paris Sorbonne. Il a notamment publié Machiavel, conflit et liberté (Vrin/EHESS), La pensée anti-68 (La Découverte), Aux origines du « néo-libéralisme ». Le Colloque Lippmann (Le Bord de l’eau) et Néo-libéralisme(s). Une archéologie intellectuelle (Grasset). La pensée solidariste. Aux sources du modèle social républicain [livre]

Workshop “Actualités Foucault”
Organised by Frédéric Gros, Daniele Lorenzini, Ariane Revel, Arianna Sforzini

5th and last meeting
Wednesday 3 June 2015, 9:30-11:30 am

“Michel Foucault : vérité et résistance de l’expérience”
Agustin Colombo (Université Paris 8 & Université de Buenos Aires)
Daniel Verginelli Galantin (UFPR & Université Paris-Est Créteil)

Sciences Po, 199 bd Saint-Germain, 75007 Paris (3° étage)

Busse, J.
Theorizing Governance as Globalized Governmentality: The Dynamics of World-Societal Order in Palestine
(2015) Middle East Critique, 29 p. Article in Press.

DOI: 10.1080/19436149.2015.1010338

Abstract
In many cases, Middle East Studies and International Relations (IR) fail to provide an appropriate account of governance and power and the underlying dynamics of global political order. In order to overcome these shortcomings, I will highlight the conceptual compatibility between Foucauldian post-structuralist governmentality studies and world society theorization from the perspective of the Stanford School’s sociological neo-institutionalism. On this basis, I will conceptualize governmentality as a globally diffused pattern of political ordering in world society. This global diffusion of governmentality, however, cannot be equated with global homogenization, because decoupling dynamics can lead to significant differences between a global norm and how it is translated into a local context. Hence, governmentality denotes a specific, universalistic configuration of governmental rationalities and technologies but also takes into account localizations of diversity. I will identify biopower, surveillance, and technologies of the self as core dimensions of modern governmentality and analyze their contribution to the establishment of political order in Palestine. In this sense, the examples of modern statistics, good governance, and refugee camp governance not only serve as empirical illustrations for the materialization of modern governmentality in Palestine. They also underline the embeddedness of Palestine into the structural horizon of world society. As a result, political order that comes into existence in Palestine needs to be understood as world-societal order.

Author Keywords
Biopower; Foucault; global governmentality; governmentality; International Relations Theory; Israeli-Palestinian conflict; Palestine; political order; power; world society