Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Grafton Tanner, Foreverism, Polity, 2023

Description
What do cinematic “universes,” cloud archiving, and voice cloning have in common? They’re in the business of foreverizing – the process of revitalizing things that have degraded, failed, or disappeared so that they can remain active in the present. To foreverize something is to reanimate it, to enclose and protect it from time and the elements, and to eradicate the feeling of nostalgia that accompanies loss. Foreverizing is a bulwark against instability, but it isn’t an infallible enterprise. That which is promised to last forever often does not, and that which is disposed of can sometimes last, disturbingly, forever.

In this groundbreaking book, American philosopher Grafton Tanner develops his theory of foreverism: an anti-nostalgic discourse that promises growth without change and life without loss. Engaging with pressing issues from the ecological impact of data storage to the rise of reboot culture, Tanner tracks the implications of a society averse to nostalgia and reveals the new weapons we have for eliminating it.

Extract

A nostalgic subject became, in the words of Foucault, “an individual to be corrected”: the one who is “regular in his irregularity” and who “appears to require correction because all the usual techniques, procedures and attempts at training… have failed to correct him”. (pp. 6-7)

About the Author
Grafton Tanner is a professor at the University of Georgia and the author of The Hours Have Lost Their Clock: The Politics of Nostalgia.

Geoghegan, Bernard Dionysius. Code: From Information Theory to French Theory. Duke University Press, 2023.

In Code Bernard Dionysius Geoghegan reconstructs how Progressive Era technocracy as well as crises of industrial democracy and colonialism shaped early accounts of cybernetics and digital media by theorists including Norbert Wiener, Warren Weaver, Margaret Mead, Gregory Bateson, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Roman Jakobson, Jacques Lacan, Roland Barthes, and Luce Irigaray. His analysis casts light on how media-practical research forged common epistemic cause in programs that stretched from 1930s interwar computing at MIT and eugenics to the proliferation of seminars and laboratories in 1960s Paris. This mobilization ushered forth new fields of study such as structural anthropology, family therapy, and literary semiology while forming enduring intellectual affinities between the humanities and informatics. With Code, Geoghegan offers a new history of French theory and the digital humanities as transcontinental and political endeavors linking interwar colonial ethnography in Dutch Bali to French sciences in the throes of Cold War-era decolonization and modernization.

Fehr, Burkhard, and Panagiotis Roilos, eds. Mythogenesis, Interdiscursivity, Ritual. Studies Presented to Demetrios Yatromanolakis (Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill, 2024)
doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004679740

The studies included in Mythogenesis, Interdiscursivity, Ritual. Studies Presented to Demetrios Yatromanolakis , a pioneering scholar— shed new light on a variety of areas: the encounters of ancient Greece with other societies and cultures in antiquity; the interplay between art (vase-painting and sculpture) and broader ideological developments/mentalities in antiquity; ritual in ancient Greek contexts; political ideologies and religion; history of scholarship, textual criticism/critical editing, and hermeneutics; the reception of myth and of archaic and classical Greek culture and philosophy in diverse discursive, mediatic, and sociocultural contexts — from impressionist painting, to modernism and the avant-garde, to Foucauldian thought.

Christopher O’Neill, Foucault And Information Theory: On “Message Or Noise?”, Parrhesia , 39 · 2024 · (1966)1-17

Extract
“Message or Noise?” is a short but highly suggestive essay, in which Michel Foucault takes up the question of medical thought and practice through the frame of information-theory – one of the few occasions throughout his enormous œuvre in which he directly engages with the question of the computational. Despite being included as text 44 of the Dits et Écrits, the piece has not before been translated into English, and has led a somewhat subterranean life within Foucault’s reception. Amidst a renewed interest in the impact of cybernetics and information theory on French structuralist and post-structuralist thought, and indeed within something of a neocybernetic turn in critical theory tout court, the significance of the piece comes into focus – even if Foucault’s analysis is perhaps conducted in an ambiguous or somewhat ironic frame. Here I establish the context of its publication, reception, and place in contemporary debates surrounding information theory in the French academy, especially in relation to the more anxious critique of information theory offered by Foucault’s mentor Georges Canguilhem. I also consider the significance of new archival resources which show Foucault was an attentive reader of developments in information theory and cybernetics from even very early in his career, and suggest some potential future research paths regarding Foucault and information theory towards which “Message or Noise?” gestures.

Michel Foucault, “Message or noise?”, Translated by Christopher O’Neill, Parrhesia 39 · 2024 · 18-24

Open access

Extract

In order to “situate” medicine amongst other forms of knowledge (savoir), we have become accustomed to the use of linear schemas. Above the level of the body, the soul; below the level of the organism, the tissues. Medicine then has tended at one end towards psychology, psychopathology, etc., and at the other to physiology. However, the discussions that I have been reading bring to light new, diagonal or lateral, relations. Certain problems arise in medicine which seem isomorphic to those that one might encounter elsewhere; especially in those disciplines which are either concerned with language, or which operate like a language. These disciplines have without doubt no “object relation” to medicine, but the latter, understood as theory-and-practice, is perhaps structurally analogous to them.

William Tilleczek, Between Authority and Care, Plato’s Crito as Defense of the Philosophical Life, Dionysius, Vol. 39 (2024)

Abstract
This paper addresses the question as to why Socrates stays to die in prison through a novel reading of the Crito oriented by the Foucaultian notion of care (epimeleia). It argues that the Laws do not speak for Socrates (the reasons they offer for staying in prison are not reasons he could have accepted). It then reconstructs the logos that did compel Socrates to stay, through a close reading attentive to the principles of philosophical judgment suggested but never fully elaborated in the Crito. Crito’s ethical and philosophical laxity prevent Socrates from fully converting him to the philosophical life via argument, so he adopts the authoritarian voice of the Laws to prevent Crito from making a dangerous judgement. This is a compromise but nonetheless an act of care: preserving his own commitment to philosophy despite pending death, Socrates also leaves intact for Crito a model of an intrinsically good life.

William Tilleczek Receives the 2024 Leo Strauss Award for “Powers of Practice: Michel Foucault and the Politics of Asceticism”, Political Science Now, August 9, 2024

The Leo Strauss Award is presented annually by the American Political Science Association (APSA) to honor the best doctoral dissertation in political philosophy.

Citation from the Award Committee:

Dr. Tilleczek’s “Powers of Practice: Michel Foucault and the Politics of Asceticism” is a meticulously crafted, exceptionally creative, deeply erudite, and beautifully written study of Foucault’s thought that recasts his contributions to contemporary analyses of neoliberalism and a politics of freedom. The dissertation’s accomplishments are noteworthy on several fronts. First, it offers a new approach to reading Foucault centered on his attentions to asceticism, understood not as a normative but rather a methodological framework that situates practices of ethical self-fashioning within their socio-political and interpersonal contexts. Joining a biographical account of Foucault with careful exegesis of his later writings on care of the self, Dr. Tilleczek elaborates a ‘general ascetology’ in which understanding power and agency as they pertain to practices of self-improvement remains a matter of historical anthropological investigation. Second, Dr. Tilleczek’s approach enables them to surface continuities between the different phases of Foucault’s work, persuasively showing how his ‘turn to antiquity’ recuperates his earlier account of discipline as a modern ascetological apparatus. Avoiding heavy-handed impositions of unity across Foucault’s corpus, Dr. Tilleczek makes their case through nuanced argumentation, deft interpretive analyses, and productively provocative intertextual readings. Third, Dr. Tilleczek’s account of Foucault’s general ascetology and the anthropology of ethics subtending it introduces rich resources, conceptual and hermeneutic, for understanding neoliberalism and its self-fashioning homo economicus. The dissertation demonstrates how self-optimization, as the generalized ‘practice imperative’ of a marketized society, both reproduces its social inequalities and cultivates forms of life that can subvert its modes of governance. Taken as a whole, “Powers of Practice” succeeds admirably not only in making significant contributions to our understanding of a pivotal and often divisive thinker but also in enabling us to ‘think (and see) what we are doing’ in the present from a fresh perspective.

William Tilleczek is a SSHRC Postdoctoral Fellow at McGill University and L’Université de Montréal, where he is a member of the Research Group on Constitutional Studies and the Centre canadien d’études allemandes et européennes, respectively. Previously, he was a Visiting Professor at Deep Springs College.

Originally from Sudbury (ON), he studied in Halifax (NS) and Toronto (ON) before completing a PhD in Government at Harvard University.

His recent works are united by an interest in ascesis/training and touch on themes and thinkers such as Hannah Arendt, anti-colonial ethics, artificial intelligence, and the moralization of poverty. His first book project works with and beyond Foucault to intervene in current debates regarding the “old” (structuralist) and “new” (individualist) left. Combining insights from classical political philosophy, Marxism, Foucault, and post-colonial theory, he is working to sketch the contours of “the means of training” as a general political problem: How are citizens forced to train, invited to train, prohibited from training? Who has access to meaningful modes of self-transformation, who is forced to train their body as a tool for the gains of the dominant? How can we collectively shape institutions that enable the ascesis required to fulfill our ethical and political goals?

Will also works as a translator and has recently published an English version of Simone Weil’s “Rationalisation.”

Elden, S. (2024). Alexandre Koyré and the Collège de France. History of European Ideas, 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.1080/01916599.2024.2391378

ABSTRACT
This article discusses an important moment in the career of Alexandre Koyré, and the history of philosophy in France. It looks at the 1951 election of a successor to Étienne Gilson at the Collège de France, for which Koyré was one of the possible candidates, alongside Henri Gouhier and Martial Gueroult. Koyré came close, but Gueroult was elected to the chair. In time, Gueroult was succeeded first by Jean Hyppolite and then, in 1970, by Michel Foucault. Using archival documents to discuss the process in detail, this article shows the weakness of Koyré’s proposers, and the strength of Gouhier’s application. Finally, drawing on Koyré’s outline of his proposed teaching programme, it discusses how success might have shaped his future career, using this as an indication of his position within and beyond a French tradition in the philosophy and history of the sciences.

KEYWORDS: Collège de France Henri Gouhier Martial Gueroult Alexandre Koyré history of the sciences

Stuart Blaney, Equality and Freedom in Rancière and Foucault, Bloomsbury, 2024


Description

Responding to the increasing need for new and peaceful forms of emancipation, Stuart Blaney offers a unique solution in the synergy between two pioneering strands of continental philosophy: Michel Foucault’s ideas on freedom and Jacques Ranciere’s ideas on equality.

Building a dialogue between these two thinkers, Blaney presents new perspectives on their work and a clear picture that emancipation comes from everyday practices rather than any particular movement or revolution.

In exploring these combined views of equality and freedom, Blaney draws on some of the central facets of both concepts, including revolution, disagreement, care for the self, free speech and stoicism. To put these ideas into a practical framework of real, lived experience, we are introduced to the figure of Louis-Gabrielle Gauny the nineteenth century worker-poet and self confessed plebeian philosopher. Gauny is a nexus for Ranciere’s and Foucault’s ideas; his life exemplifying a dual mode of existence in-between conformity and political revolution. This lived philosophy of equality and freedom shows the strong synergy between the two concepts, with one reinforcing the other and strengthening their efficacy as forms of emancipatory practice.

Table of Contents
1. Introduction
Part One: Rancière and Practices of Equality
2. A Presupposition of Equality
3. Disagreement
4. Redefining Emancipation: Politics as Aesthetics and Aesthetics as Politics
5. Archives, Revenants, and Aesthetics: The Milieu of the Life of Louis-Gabriel Gauny
Part Two: Foucault and Practices of Freedom
6. A Historico-Critical Ontology: Discursive and Non-Discursive Practices
7.An Aesthetics of Existence: The Care of the Self
8. Parrhesia and Cynicism
Part Three: Practices of Equality and Freedom
9. The Traces of a Path: The Emancipatory Life of Gauny
10. Fictions: Reframing the Real
11. Conclusion

Elden, Stuart. “Foucault and Dumézil on Antiquity.” Journal of the History of Ideas 85, no. 3 (2024): 571-600. https://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhi.2024.a933859.

Abstract:
The biographical links between Michel Foucault and the comparative mythologist and philologist Georges Dumézil have received more attention than their intellectual connections. This article contributes by surveying Foucault’s engagements, from a 1957 radio lecture to his late lectures at the Collège de France. Particular focus is on lectures on structuralism and history in 1970, some references between 1970 and 1981, and the use of Dumézil’s work in each of Foucault’s two final courses at the Collège de France. In each, Foucault takes up Dumézil’s analyses of mythology in developing his own projects concerning history and antiquity.