Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Essien, Essien Oku. 2025. “Climate Change Disinformation on Social Media: A Meta-Synthesis on Epistemic Welfare in the Post-Truth Era” Social Sciences 14, no. 5: 304.

https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14050304

Abstract
Climate change disinformation has emerged as a substantial issue in the internet age, affecting public perceptions, policy response, and climate actions. This study, grounded on the theoretical frameworks of social epistemology, Habermas’s theory of communicative action, post-truth, and Foucault’s theory of power-knowledge, examines the effect of digital infrastructures, ideological forces, and epistemic power dynamics on climate change disinformation. The meta-synthesis approach in the study reveals the mechanics of climate change disinformation on social media, the erosion of epistemic welfare influenced by post-truth dynamics, and the ideological and algorithmic amplification of disinformation, shedding light on climate change misinformation as well. The findings show that climate change disinformation represents not only a collection of false claims but also a broader epistemic issue sustained by digital environments, power structures, and fossil corporations. Right-wing populist movements, corporate interests, and algorithmic recommendation systems substantially enhance climate skepticism, intensifying political differences and public distrust in scientific authority. The study highlights the necessity of addressing climate change disinformation through improved scientific communication, algorithmic openness, and digital literacy initiatives. Resolving this conundrum requires systemic activities that go beyond fact-checking, emphasizing epistemic justice and legal reforms.

Keywords:
climate change; disinformation and misinformation; epistemic harm; ideological polarization; post-truth; algorithmic amplification; social media

Joakim Slinning Lange, “Stemmen som fortsetter etter døden (om Henri-Paul Fruchaud (red.), Michel Foucault, Entretiens radiophoniques 1961-1983). In Agora. Journal for metafysisk spekulasjon, nr. 1-2, 2025 “Judith Butler”, 265-89

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18261/agora.43.1-2.12

40 år etter forfatterens død fortsetter det han sa og skrev, å snakke til oss. På tampen av en lang rekke posthume utgivelser fra Centre Michel Foucault, som har hatt som effekt både å tilgjengeliggjøre og transformere Michel Foucaults «œuvre», utkom høsten 2024 en samling som lenge har glimret med sitt fravær: Forlagene Flammarion og J. Vrin utga i samarbeid med Institut National de l’Audiovisuel (INA) boka Michel Foucault, Entretiens radiophoniques. Utgivelsen er redigert av Henri-Paul Fruchaud, Foucaults nevø og redaktør av flere posthume utgivelser, som sammen med Frédéric Gros, tidligere leder for Centre Michel Foucault, også har skrevet en innledning. Boka for øvrig består av 900 sider med transkripsjoner av i alt 63 radioprogrammer som Foucault deltok i fra 1961 til 1983. I likhet med tekstene samlet i Dits et écrits, dukker Foucault opp i intervjuer om bøkene sine, han holder forelesninger og deltar i debatter. Kanskje mer overraskende er involveringen i radiodokumentarer som Recherche de notre temps (april 1963), hvor Foucault presenterer sju sosiologiske programmer om rollen til «smerte og lidelse» i samtiden, og hvor han blant annet intervjuer filosofen Gilles Deleuze og historikeren Jacques Le Goff.

Utgivelsen av Entretiens radiophoniques (heretter forkortet ER) gir anledning til å reflektere over hvordan Foucaults posthume forfatterskap er konstruert, nærmere bestemt over den spesifikke rollen den audiovisuelle delen av verket har fått. Samlingen representerer nemlig et klart brudd med den implisitte redaksjonelle linjen som har fulgt i utgivelsen av Foucaults verker, der man har skilt mellom de audiovisuelle og de tekstlige arbeider. ER gir derfor et viktig tillegg til de posthume bokutgivelsene som til nå har utkommet. Samlingen involverer også, i likhet med Senterets tidligere utgivelser, et redaksjonelt arbeid som, gjennom utvalg, utelatelse, presentasjon og kontekstualisering av kilder, fungerer som en viktig minnehandling, som bidrar til å skape en bestemt forestilling, ikke bare om Foucault, men også om hans samtid og samtidige.

English
The article contains a list of 5 pages of additional audiovisual material that was not included in Entretiens radiophoniques

Speech that continues after death
40 years after the death of the author, what he said and wrote continues to speak to us. On the eve of a long series of posthumous publications from the Centre Michel Foucault, which have had the effect of both making Michel Foucault’s “œuvre” accessible and transforming it, a collection was published in the Autumn of 2024 that has long been conspicuous by its absence: the publishers Flammarion and J. Vrin, in collaboration with the Institut National de l’Audiovisuel (INA), published the book Michel Foucault, Entretiens radiophoniques. The publication is edited by Henri-Paul Fruchaud, Foucault’s nephew and editor of several posthumous publications, who, together with Frédéric Gros, former director of the Centre Michel Foucault, has also written an introduction. The book consists of 900 pages of transcriptions of a total of 63 radio programs that Foucault participated in from 1961 to 1983. Like the texts collected in Dits et écrits, Foucault appears in interviews about his books, gives lectures and participates in debates. Perhaps more surprising is his involvement in radio documentaries such as Recherche de notre temps (April 1963), in which Foucault presents seven sociological programs on the role of “pain and suffering” in the present, and in which he interviews, among others, the philosopher Gilles Deleuze and the historian Jacques Le Goff.

The publication of Entretiens radiophoniques (hereinafter abbreviated ER) provides an opportunity to reflect on how Foucault’s posthumous writings are constructed, more specifically on the specific role that the audiovisual part of the work has been given. The collection represents a clear break with the implicit editorial line that has been followed in the publication of Foucault’s works, where a distinction has been made between the audiovisual and the textual works. ER therefore provides an important addition to the posthumous book publications that have been published to date. The collection also involves, like the Centre’s previous publications, an editorial work that, through selection, omission, presentation and contextualisation of sources, functions as an important act of memory construction, which contributes to the creation of a specific idea, not only of Foucault, but also of his time and contemporaries.

Summary
In brief, the text provides a critical perspective/introduction to the collection, which highlights some of its shortcomings (in terms of the promise of presenting “Foucault on the radio” implied by the collection): situating it in relation to the relative absence of radio and TV material among previous posthumous (print) publications; showing some of the material that has been left out (knowingly or unknowingly) by ER; as well as discussing some of the contexts that have been omitted, and which could be explored further. Without wanting to take away from the importance of the text, the article points towards some important contexts, as well as highlighting the need and the opportunities for further exploring the audiovisual aspects of Michel Foucault’s multifaceted work.

Foucault Studies, Issue 37, Spring 2025

Open access

Table of Contents

Editorial
pp. iii-v
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00001

Special Section: Contributions from the Foucault Circle
Lauren Guilmette, Ege Selin Islekel
pp. 1-4
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00002

black Foucault: An Intellectual Reparations Project
Taryn D. Jordan, Haylee Christine Harrell
pp. 5-34
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00003

On COVID and Racism as “Twin Pandemics”: Foucault, Anti-Racism, and Inoculation
Eyo Ewara
pp. 35-54
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00004

Legopolitics
Robert S. Leib
pp. 55-74
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00005

Strategic Matters: Apparatuses, Sub-Individuals, and Anthropological Slumber
Daniel Perlman
pp. 75-102
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00006

Reviews

Dispositif: A Cartography ed. by Greg Bird and Giovanbattista Tusa (review)
Sebastián Rodríguez Cárdenas
pp. 103-105
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00007

Foucault in Brazil: Dictatorship, Resistance, and Solidarity by Marcelo Hoffman (review)
Stephen Shapiro
pp. 106-108
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00008

The Limits of Scientific Reason: Habermas, Foucault, and Science as a Social Institution by John McIntyre (review)
Evangelia Sembou
pp. 109-113
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/fou.00009

I’m pleased to announce that Foucault Studies is now published by Penn Press. Foucault Studies is the only international journal in the English language devoted to the work and influence of Michel Foucault. The journal remains open access. Future issues will be hosted on Project MUSE, while back issues will continue to be available on the journal’s website.

The journal is edited by Knut Ove Eliassen, Robert Harvey, Daniele Lorenzini, Clare O’Farrell, Sverre Raffnsøe, and Dianna Taylor. Led by an international editorial board of renowned Foucault scholars, Foucault Studies provides a platform for interdisciplinary scholarship engaging with Foucault’s thought across the humanities and social sciences. In keeping with Foucault’s wide-ranging theoretical and political commitments, past contributions have spanned philosophy, comparative literature, political theory, art, anthropology, sociology, geography, and law. The journal is committed to preserving and extending Foucault’s legacy by supporting rigorous contemporary engagement with his work.

Foucault Studies is online-only and published biannually. To submit or learn more, visit https://fs.pennpress.org.

Alex Taek-Gwang Lee, Encoding Plasticity: The Rise of Molecular Biopolitics and Human Capital, University of Toronto Quarterly 2025 94:2, 257-275

Abstract
This article explores the fundamental concept of plasticity in living organisms and its complex relationship with capitalism and its datafication of life. Plasticity is presented as a crucial adaptive mechanism allowing organisms to respond to environmental changes. I examine how capitalism has uniquely developed methods to exploit this biological plasticity for economic growth, transforming adaptive processes into commodifiable resources, and the paradoxical nature of this relationship, where capitalist systems simultaneously depend on, and potentially undermine, the adaptive capacities of living systems. My focus is on how this exploitation ranges from genetic modification of crops to the manipulation of consumer behaviour through neuroplasticity-based marketing strategies. Furthermore, my discussion traces the historical roots of this dynamic, referencing Adam Smith’s and Karl Marx’s observations on the mechanization of labour and its connection to the division of tasks. It then expands on this by introducing Michel Foucault’s concept of disciplinary power and its role in shaping and restricting the plasticity of life within industrialized societies. The article details how this form of power operates through surveillance, normalization, and the meticulous control of bodies, as exemplified by Taylorism in factory settings. My argument goes on to explore the transition from disciplinary power to biopower, a more expansive form of control that regulates life processes on a population scale. It also recounts Foucault’s analysis of neoliberalism as a pervasive form of governmentality that shapes human conduct and subjectivity in alignment with market-oriented principles. In conclusion, this work provides an analysis of the connections between biological adaptability, economic systems, and power mechanisms.

Xenia Chiaramonte, Bio-story. Michel Foucault and the history of social medicine. In Eds. Marta-Laura Cenedese, Clio Nicastro, Violence, Care, Cure. Self/perceptions within the Medical Encounter, Routledge, 2025

Abstract
In October 1974, Foucault gave three lectures in Rio de Janeiro on the archaeology of the cure. This piece will comment on the first two, published a few years later in France with the original titles ‘Crise de la médicine ou crise de l’antimédicine?’ and ‘La naissance de la médicine sociale’. Bio-history is the term Michel Foucault initially uses – in the second lecture – to refer to the effect of the strong medical intervention at the biological level, which started in the eighteenth century and has left a trace that is still visible in our society. It is on this occasion that Foucault introduces the concept, or rather the prefix, ‘bio’ in his analysis, and it is here – as my reflections intend to demonstrate – that we may trace the original meaning of a term that today seems rather abused, in order to find a valuable analytical framework for a cogent approach to the relationship between medicine and power dynamics.

Paolo Vernaglione Berardi, Per una storia della verità, Archeologia del presente blog, 2 Aprile 2025

Michel Foucault nella prima lezione dell’ultimo corso al Collège de France, Il coraggio della verità, riprende la nozione di parresia e definisce diversi modi del dir vero. le strutture caratteristiche dei differenti discorsi che vengono accetatati come veri si riferiscono a campi del sapere e a pratiche di verità che costituiscono eventi storico-politici.

Diversi modi di produrre il discorso vero delimitano lo spazio in cui si producono i rapporti tra soggetto e verità e attraverso l’insieme delle relazioni di verità il soggetto riconosce sè stesso ed è riconosciuto come colui che dive la verità. «Il soggetto che dive la verità si manifesta». La circoscrizione di questo insieme di relazioni alla verità si può chiamare aleturgia. Le forme aleturgiche riferiscono i modi in cui un soggetto manifesta a sè e agli altri la verità del proprio discorso e le aleturgie sono anche i modi in cui il soggetto si lega alla verità. Il doppio vincolo alla verità del discorso e del soggetto nel manifestarsi genera il riconoscimento del soggetto come colui che dice il vero.

[…]

Shahidullah, A. K. M., & Mohiuddin, H. (2025). Indoctrinated Developmentalism and Local Sustainability: A Social–Ecological Model for Community-Based Enterprises. Sustainability, 17(9), 4181.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su17094181

Abstract
Developmental approaches over time have been largely economistic and overlooked local sustainability preconditions. They were greatly influenced by a host of doctrines, theories, and strategies argued through macro-level, macro-scale policies. This research retrospectively views these approaches as they have evolved post-WWII and their effect on sustainability at a community level. It eventually focuses on a specific community-level developmental strategy, i.e., “microfinance”, which has led to the establishment of millions of microenterprises. In recent decades, community-based enterprise (CBE) development has been a widely practiced mode of developmental intervention to develop underdeveloped communities in developing countries. The primary goal of CBEs is to generate profit for people’s livelihood. This research indicates that CBEs offer potential. They can be ecologically sustainable and socially responsible too. A shift in the present model to encourage CBEs’ pursuit of ecological principles is tenable. Foucault’s notion of “dispositif” allows such a shift with incorporation of environmental alongside economic and social goals as a new strategic disposition (model). Therefore, this study presents a social–ecological model of CBE and asserts that it embeds the necessary components to bring about sustainability at a community level.

Keywords:
developmentalism; community-based enterprise; sustainability; dispositif; microfinance