Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Discussions on Intolerable: Writings from Michel Foucault and the Prisons Information Group (U of Minnesota Press, 2021), eds. Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn and trs. Perry Zurn and Erik Beranek.

**Conversations in Atlantic theory: Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn on Intolerable: . Podcast (January 2022)

**Recorded Zoom Conversation with Kevin Thompson and Perry Zurn on Intolerable, Radical Philosophy hour, Radical Philosophy Association (2021)

**New Books in Politics and Polemics, Michel Foucault, “Intolerable: Writings from Michel Foucault and the Prisons Information Group (1970-1980)” (U of Minnesota Press, 2021) An interview with Perry Zurn and Kevin Thompson on the New Books network (2021)

**Archival Relations and Activist Intimacies: from the GIP to IntolerableA conversation between Perry Zurn and Erik Beranek. Hopscotch translation. Written discussion

**Symposium in Number 31 Foucault Studies , 9 items

Palti, E.J.
Deleuze’s Foucault: on the possibility of an outside of knowledge/power
(2021) History and Theory, 60 (4), pp. 20-35.

DOI: 10.1111/hith.12234

Abstract
During 1985 and 1986, Gilles Deleuze directed a seminar on Michel Foucault’s work at the University of Paris 8 at Vincennes/St. Denis. The course was divided into three parts, one dedicated to each of the three levels on which, according to Deleuze, Foucault’s concept of thinking unfolds: knowledge, power, and subjectivation. As I will show, Deleuze’s attempt to reconstruct Foucault’s perspective on the history of thought is highly enlightening, although, at some crucial points, it raises doubts regarding the plausibility of the hypotheses that Deleuze attributed to Foucault. In particular, in the third part, which focuses on subjectivation, it is not clear whether Deleuze was attempting to relate Foucault’s concept or to expose his own ideas on the topic. The displacements, which Deleuze introduced into Foucault’s perspective, are particularly interesting, since they are symptomatic of broader epistemological problems that philosophical thought currently faces in attempting to articulate a consistent perspective of the possibility of an “outside” of power or, in Foucault’s formulation, knowledge/power. © 2021 Wesleyan University

Author Keywords
Gilles Deleuze; knowledge/power; metaphilosophy; Michel Foucault; subjectivation

Boyle, C.
The (in)credible fiscal prize: A critical examination of the discourse of evidence in early childhood intervention
(2021) Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood

DOI: 10.1177/14639491211059164
Open access

Abstract
In playing with the concept of ‘credibility’, this article presents a critical examination of the discourse of evidence and the programming of upbringing in early intervention policy and practice. The truth claims of the evidence discourse in policy are explored through a single complex case study of an early intervention city in Northern Ireland. The framework for the study discussed uses Bourdieu’s thinking tools of habitus, capital and field alongside Foucauldian discourse analysis to explore the ways in which early intervention policy and practice impact on children, parents and communities. A key question is to consider how evidence is constructed within the discourse and how this can be considered as a Foucauldian regime of truth. Building from the emerging body of critique around scientism and parenting, the study extends this through a sociopolitical lens to the Northern Ireland context. Despite a strong tradition in Northern Ireland of community-based activism and political transition from direct rule to devolution, early intervention policy and programming have tended towards direct read across from Britain and the USA. The study documents that community-based practice struggles within the policy field for recognition, yet ‘home grown’ carries significant social capital within and across communities. The dominant policy discourse of the (in)credible ‘fiscal prize’, transformation through evidence-based interventions contrasts with the backdrop of worsening child poverty in communities. Contrary to the truth claims, this suggests the reproduction rather than transformation of social disadvantage. © The Author(s) 2021.

Author Keywords
Bourdieu; discourse; early intervention; evidence; Foucault

Le foucaldien relaunched as Genealogy + Critique (2022)

From 2022, the peer-reviewed, open-access journal Le foucaldien, published by the London-based Open Library of Humanities (OLH), and the affiliated foucaultblog appear under the new title GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE at genealogy-critique.net. The relaunch broadens the scope of the journal and its blog by including various approaches of historical-genealogical research and critical theory formation.

GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE focuses on genealogical scholarship and a broad conception of critical theory. Combining historical and systematic forms of inquiry, the interdisciplinary journal fosters critical analyses of the present written in English, German, or French. It also aims at confronting historical-genealogical and critical theory approaches with concepts and methods in more recent fields of knowledge such as media studies, digital humanities, science and technology studies, as well as postcolonial, gender, and race studies.

The journal’s publisher, the Open Library of Humanities, is a nonprofit organization financed by an international consortium of academic institutions. Due to its noncommercial orientation, the OLH does not charge any author fees. All articles published in GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE are peer-reviewed, available open access under the Creative Commons license CC BY 4.0, indexed in the Directory of Open Access Journals (among other databases), and archived for the long term in HTML, PDF, and XML.

The journal is published as a continuous volume and issue throughout the year. Articles go online as soon as they are ready to avoid unnecessary delays in making knowledge publicly available. Special collections are published as part of the normal volumes, but also on separate web pages. GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE is edited by Simon Ganahl, Maurice Erb, Stephanie Marx, Sergej Seitz, and Anna Wieder, who are supported by an advisory board of highly renowned scholars.

Succeeding the foucaultblog, the G+C Blog continues to post announcements related to the activities of GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE. It also keeps publishing shorter essays, interventions, and commentaries by guest authors. While GENEALOGY+CRITIQUE is positioned as a high-quality academic journal, the G+C Blog is an explicitly open platform providing a digital space for more experimental and subjective forms of writing.

Kurtulus, G., İnci, M. “Merkantilizminin Disiplinci İktidar Projesi: Büyük Kapatilma [The Disciplinary Power Project Of French Mercantilism:The Great Confinement]”. Marmara University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences 43 (2021): 253-265
https://dx.doi.org/10.14780/muiibd.1052065

Open access
An extended abstract in English can be found at the end of the paper.

Öz
Fransa, merkantilist doktrinin en önemli temsilcilerinden biriydi. Bu kadar önemli olmasında hiç şüphesiz dönemin maliye bakanı J.B. Colbert’in etkisi büyüktür. Öyle ki, Fransız merkantilizmi tarih boyunca Colbertizm olarak anılmıştır. Colbert döneminde ülkede ekonomik gelişmenin sağlanması amacıyla daha önce benzeri görülmemiş birtakım uygulamalar hayata geçirilmiştir. Bu uygulamalardan biri, verimli olarak görülmeyen kişilerin Colbert yönetimi tarafından bazı kurumlara kapatılması olmuştur. “Büyük Kapatılma” olarak adlandırılan bu sürecin en başından beri bilinçli bir proje olduğu savunulmaktadır. Buna göre projenin amacı, tek tip insanlardan oluşan bir toplum modeli yaratmaktı. Fransa’da devlet bu projenin kurgulanmasında ön planda olmuştur. Foucault on yedinci yüzyılda, iktidar kavramının ilişkisellikten öte somut bir yönetim sanatına dönüşerek farklı bir iktidar biçiminin ortaya çıktığını ileri sürmektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, Fransız merkantilizmi teorisini, Foucault’nun disiplinci iktidar kavramından hareketle eleştiriye açmaktır. Bu kapsamda, dönemin maliye bakanı J.B. Colbert tarafından yönetilen Fransa ekonomisi ile o dönemde yükselişe geçen kapatma kurumları arasındaki ilişki; Foucault’nun disiplinci iktidar kavramı çerçevesinde değerlendirilmiştir.
Anahtar Kelimeler: Büyük Kapatılma, Colbertizm, Disiplinci İktidar, Foucault
Jel Sınıflandırması: B11, B30, B59, Z13.

Abstract
France was one of the most important representatives of mercantilist doctrine. Undoubtedly, the Secretary of the Treasury at the time, J.B. Colbert’s influence was great. So, French mercantilism has been called Colbertism throughout history. In Colbert’s time, a number of unprecedented practices were implemented in provision of economic development in the country. One of these practices was the closure of people who were not seen as efficient to certain institutions by the Colbert administration. It has been argued that the process called “The Great Confinement” was a conscious project from the beginning. The aim of the project was to create a model of society consisting of one kind. In France, the state was at the forefront in the construction of this project. Foucault argues that in the seventeenth century, a different form of power emerged by transforming the concept of power into a concrete art of government rather than relationality. The aim of the study is to open the French mercantilism theory to criticism based on Foucault’s disciplinary power concept. In this context, the relationship between the French economy, which was managed by J.B. Colbert, the Secretary of the Treasury at the time, and the seclusion practices was examined within the scope of the literature. This review has been evaluated within the framework of Foucault’s disciplinary power concept.
Keywords: Colbertism, Disciplinary Power, Foucault, Great Confinement
JEL Classification: B11, B30, B59, Z13.

Nancy Luxon (Ed.) Archives of Infamy. Foucault on State Power in the Lives of Ordinary Citizens. Translated by Thomas Scott-Railton, University of Minnesota Press, 2019

What might it mean for ordinary people to intervene in the circulation of power between police and the streets, sovereigns and their subjects? How did the police come to understand themselves as responsible for the circulation of people as much as things—and to separate law and justice from the maintenance of a newly emergent civil order? These are among the many questions addressed in the interpretive essays in Archives of Infamy.

Crisscrossing the Atlantic to bring together unpublished radio broadcasts, book reviews, and essays by historians, geographers, and political theorists, Archives of Infamy provides historical and archival contexts to the recent translation of Disorderly Families by Arlette Farge and Michel Foucault. This volume includes new translations of key texts, including a radio address Foucault gave in 1983 that explains the writing process for Disorderly Families; two essays by Foucault not readily available in English; and a previously untranslated essay by Farge that describes how historians have appropriated Foucault.

Archives of Infamy pushes past old debates between philosophers and historians to offer a new perspective on the crystallization of ideas—of the family, gender relations, and political power—into social relationships and the regimes of power they engender.

Contributors: André Béjin, Centre national de recherche scientifique; Roger Chartier, Collège de France; Stuart Elden, U of Warwick; Arlette Farge, Centre national de recherche scientifique; Michel Foucault (1926–1984); Jean-Philippe Guinle, Catholic Institute of Paris; Michel Heurteaux; Lynne Huffer, Emory University; Pierre Nora, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales; Michelle Perrot; Michel Rey (1953–1993); Elizabeth Wingrove, U of Michigan.

Contents
Preface and Acknowledgments
Introduction
Policing and Criminality in Disorderly Families
Nancy Luxon

PART I Archival Materials: Audiences and Contexts
1 Lives of Infamous Men (1977)
Michel Foucault

2 “All about the Lettres de Cachet” (1983)
André Béjin, Roger Chartier, Arlette Farge,
Michel Foucault, and Michelle Perrot

3 Review of Disorderly Families (1983)
Jean-Philippe Guinle

4 Denunciation, a Slow Poison (1983)
Michel Heurteaux

PART II Letters and Events: From Composition to Contestation
5 The Order of Discourse (1970)
Michel Foucault

6 The Public Sphere and Public Opinion (1990)
Roger Chartier

7 The Return of the Event (1972)
Pierre Nora

8 Thinking and Defining the Event in History (2002)
Arlette Farge

9 Home, Street, City: Farge, Foucault, and
the Spaces of the Lettres de Cachet
Stuart Elden

10 Parisian Homosexuals Create a Lifestyle,
1700–1750: The Police Archives (1985)
Michel Rey

11 Sovereign Address (2012)
Elizabeth Wingrove

12 Gender, Agency, and the Circulations of Power
Nancy Luxon

13 Foucault’s Rhythmic Hand
Lynne Huffer

PDF dépliant

Michèle COHEN-HALIMI et Orazio IRRERA 

Nietzsche, Foucault et la généalogie

Université Paris 8 | Semestre 2 | mardi 12h15-15h

(Les séances auront lieu sur Zoom et un lien sera transmis aux inscrits)

Inscriptions / contacts : orazio.irrera02@univ-paris8.fr | m.cohenhalimi@gmail.com

Séminaire organisé dans le cadre des activités pédagogiques et de recherche du Département de Philosophie de l’Université de Paris 8, du LLCP (EA, 4008), du GRAF (Groupe de Recherche sur les Archives Foucaldiennes), du Collège international de Philosophie, et du séminaire permanent « Foucault à Paris 8 ». Activité soutenue par le Centre Michel Foucault et la revue materiali foucaultiani.

La généalogie comprise comme méthode surgit tardivement dans le corpus nietzschéen, dans La Généalogie de la morale en 1887, et ne procède pas directement de l’élaboration du concept d’inactualité, ni de celui d’histoire, tels du moins qu’ils sont déployés dans la deuxième Considération inactuelle (1874). L’histoire de l’élaboration des concepts nietzschéens de « méthode généalogique », d’« inactualité », d’histoire (antiquaire, monumentale et critique), sera confrontée à l’usage qu’en fait Foucault et au contexte philosophique français de cet usage ainsi qu’aux transformations de cet usage à l’intérieur même du corpus foucaldien. Devraient ainsi se voir éclairées les perspectives, nietzschéenne et foucaldiennes, fort différentes sur l’historicité et se voir explicités certains enjeux de la lecture foucaldienne de Nietzsche, dont notamment celui qui gravite autour de la notion de diagnostic, celui aussi de l’inspiration nietzschéenne qui accompagne l’inscription par Foucault d’une perspective archéologique dans le discours philosophique, et enfin celui du rapport de l’archéologie avec l’actualité et l’histoire, à l’intérieur de la perspective généalogique.

La première partie du séminaire prévoit les interventions des membres du GRAF :

25 janvier – Khaïang FALVISANER (Université Paris 8 | GRAF)
La généalogie foucaldienne et le devenir philologique de la philosophie. Entre Nietzsche et la psychologie historique d’Ignace Meyerson.

1er février – Benjamin LARVOL (Université Paris 8 | GRAF)
Foucault au prisme de l’exaleiphein : la surcharge de l’oubli d’Athènes réinvesti par Nicole Loraux.

15 février – Camila GINÉS (Université Paris 8 | LLCP | GRAF)
Généalogie, alèthurgie et critique : le geste philosophique de l’Ecce Homo et les stratégies de la critique chez Foucault.

22 février – Alessandro FALCONIERI (Université Paris 8 | LLCP | GRAF)
Réceptions (anti)dialectiques de Nietzsche en France. Peut-on jouer le Nietzsche d’Henri Lefebvre contre Michel Foucault ?

8 mars – Andrea ANGELINI (Université Paris 8 | ENS/Centre Cavaillès | GRAF)
Généalogie et évolutionnismes :  Foucault, Nietzsche et nous.

15 mars – Gabriela JAQUET (Université Paris-Est Créteil | LIS | GRAF)
Deixologie, archéologie, généalogie : variations de l’événement chez Foucault à la lumière du structuralisme et de l’héritage nietzschéen.

Warwick Continental Philosophy Conference 2021/2022
Continental Philosophy and Global Challenges
Historical perspectives through practical engagements

09-11 June 2022
University of Warwick (UK)
Conference Venue:
Department of Philosophy, University of Warwick
Coventry, United Kingdom

Keynote Speakers:
Prof. Bernard Harcourt (Columbia Law School)
Dr Elena Louisa Lange (University of Zurich)
TBA

Call for Abstracts
The aim of the fourth edition of the WCPC is to explore the ways in which continental philosophy has addressed and continues to address ‘global challenges’ – a term we use to indicate phenomena that can be described as problems affecting the entire globe and concerning the whole of humanity as well as non-human agents. More specifically, we aim to interrogate the kind of temporality that underlies the notion of global challenges both in philosophical reflection and in ensuing political practices.

In speaking of the temporality of such a concept, we are specifically thinking about the drive to address worldwide issues only as concluded events, in the aftermaths of which we live – a drive we could argue to be widespread, as the concepts of post-neoliberalism, post-fascism, or post-democracy suggest. The attitude some countries have towards the Covid emergency is another striking example. The local response to the pandemic, for instance, has seen the UK government advising (until a few weeks ago) that we were living in a post-Covid era; despite many of us feeling that the pandemic was and is far from being over, we were encouraged to act as if the contrary was the case.

Whilst treating challenges of global importance as past events might seem to promise an easier way to think about them, such an approach may harbour a fundamental responsibility for the difficulties we encounter when we try to come to terms with more temporarily extended events, such as climate change or, as suggested above, the covid pandemic. Further, we are compelled to interrogate whether philosophy can understand an event only when it is over (as the Hegelian image of the owl of Minerva seems to suggest), when it is vanquishing (capturing an idea only at the moment of its disappearance, as Benjamin indicates with his analysis of the aura), or if it can aspire to understand its own time and challenges whilst they are still happening.

In questioning this temporalisation of global challenges, we thus primarily intend to highlight the ways in which traditional approaches might have: i) prevented the development of potential solutions; ii) foreclosed alternative conceptual frameworks that could promise more effective practices. This suggests that it is worth exploring the historical sense that grounds different practices aimed at responding to global challenges, and even examining whether a clear perspective on the nature of these events is required in order to act on reality.

We are particularly interested in looking beyond Western perspectives to develop an understanding of the global nature of these challenges. In light of this problematisation, some of the questions we want to engage with in the fourth edition of WCPC are:

Can philosophy only give sense to global challenges when living in their aftermath, or can it conceptualise them in their midst, and point out possible ways forward?
Can the continental tradition provide us with still-relevant reflections on the place that philosophy can assume in the unfolding of history?
How have the continental philosophers of the past addressed the global challenges of their time; did they, implicitly or explicitly, assume a stance regarding the role of philosophy with respect to these events?
How do contemporary thinkers belonging to this tradition answer these questions and/or conceptualise the historical nature of our global challenges?
What kind of practices are enabled by certain approaches to the temporal nature of global challenges, and what are interdicted?
Is an historical sense required for philosophy to come out of itself and transform the world?

Submission Guidelines
Submitted abstracts should be approximately 500-800 words long. Abstracts must be written in English, and should be sent to the WCPC committee at wcpc@warwick.ac.uk. Please use “Abstract, [your name]” as the subject of your email. In the text of the email, please include 1) the title of your paper, 2) your institutional affiliation, and 3) your preferred email contact address. Please exclude any identifying information from the abstract itself.

The deadline for abstract submission is the 12th of February 2022.

We will be asking the speakers to pre-circulate their papers and provide, during their speaking slot, a short 5-minute introduction, which will be followed by 25 minutes of questions and discussions (maximum). This means that, if your abstract is accepted, we will require you to send us a 3000-word paper in advance and no later than on 13th of May 2022.

Your paper will be shared with other speakers and conference participants, and conference discussions will be based on the submitted version.

We particularly encourage submissions by philosophers from groups who are underrepresented in the discipline.

Summary of Dates
12th of February 2022 – deadline for abstract submission
13th of May 2022 – deadline for the submission of conference papers (3000 words)
9th – 11th of June 2022 – conference dates

Additional information
This conference is made possible by generous funding provided by the University of Warwick Philosophy Department, British Society for the History of Philosophy and The Mind Association. It is an annual event within The Centre for Research in Post-Kantian European Philosophy (University of Warwick). The conference is organised in compliance with the BPA/SWIP guidelines for accessible conferences, the BPA/SWIP good practice scheme for gender equality, and the BPA Environmental Travel Scheme. Further details regarding the conference, registration, and travelling to the University of Warwick can be found on the official conference website.

Tobias, S.
Critique as virtue: Buddhism, Foucault, and the ethics of critique
(2021) Comparative and Continental Philosophy

DOI: 10.1080/17570638.2021.2008846

Abstract
This article examines Michel Foucault’s views concerning the ethical salience of critique and compares those views to the Buddhist Madhyamaka tradition. As a critic of the Enlightenment, Foucault’s approach to ethics vacillated between deconstructing moral concepts such as “self” and “freedom,” and affirming them as the basis of an ethics conceived as “self-fashioning.” Madhyamaka thought provides a critical account of social reality that resonates with Foucault, particularly concerning the emancipatory potential of critique, but it arrives at different ethical conclusions, viewing compassion rather than vertiginous freedom as the outcome of any thorough critique of the self. © 2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Author Keywords
Buddhism; critique; ethics; Foucault; post-structuralism

stuartelden's avatarProgressive Geographies

Between 1967 and 1968. Louis Althusser and some of his students delivered a course at the ENS pitched as philosophy for scientists or non-philosophers.

Some parts of the course have been published, including Alain Badiou’s Le concept du modèle in 1969 and Michel Fichant and Michel Pécheux, Sur L’histoire des sciences shortly afterwards. Badiou’s text was reissued by Fayard in 2007 and translated as The Concept of Modelby re:press that same year.

These early volumes indicate others to follow, including an Introduction by Althusser, Expérience et Expérimentation by Pierre Macherey and Etienne Balibar, and a Conclusion provisoire.

The series as listed in the Badiou and Fichant/Pécheux volumes

Between Badiou’s book and the Fichant/Pécheux one the structure of the series changed, with François Regnault withdrawing his contribution, and the third and fifth volumes being merged. Of the second plan, only Althusser’s Introduction was published, as Philosophie et philosophie…

View original post 301 more words