Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Thakur, S. Environmental crises as crises of representation: Community rights and natural resource (Mis) management in India. Jindal Global Law Review 16, 357–386 (2025).
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41020-025-00273-3

Abstract
If one has to look for the origin to diffusing environmental crises, one must look in the forests and the usurpation of its governance from communities by the developmental state. This paper undertakes an interdisciplinary examination of the nexus between environmental crises, representation, community rights, and natural resource management in India, specifically focusing on the marginalisation of forest dwellers. Drawing insights from subaltern studies and postcolonial theory, the analysis centres on three pivotal moments within the legal framework on forest governance, namely, the enactment of the Forest Rights Act 1972, the Niyamgiri Hills movement and the subsequent court decision, and the 2019 Supreme Court eviction order of forest dwellers from forest land. Through a critical examination of these case studies, the paper argues that environmental crises in India are fundamentally crises of representation, perpetuated by hegemonic structures that marginalise tribal and local voices and interests. The theoretical framework encompasses the works of Antonio Gramsci, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, and Foucault, among others. This framework can help examine how dominant narratives and power structures shape environmental policies and resource management practices, often to the detriment of the forest-dwelling communities.

Keywords
Forest Rights Act, Adivasi, Forest dwellers, Representation, Traditional knowledge, Natural resource management

Call for papers
XIV MICHEL FOUCAULT INTERNATIONAL COLLOQUIUM: 50 YEARS OF THE HISTORY OF SEXUALITY
May 26 to 29, 2026
Federal University of Bahia, in Salvador, Brazil.
Instagram
contact: foucaultnabahia@gmail.com
_______________________________________________________________________
CALL FOR PAPERS AND REGISTRATION OF APPLICANTS: ORAL COMMUNICATIONS IN THEMATIC SYMPOSIUMS AND PANELS

1. OVERVIEW
The XIV Michel Foucault International Colloquium: 50 Years of the History of Sexuality will be held in person from May 26 to 29, 2026, at the Federal University of Bahia, Salvador, Brazil.

The Organizing Committee invites submissions of proposals for Oral Communications in Thematic Symposiums (TSs) and for Panel Exhibition Sessions, under the terms described below.

• Thematic Symposiums (TSs) will take place in the afternoons of May 26–28, 2026.
• Panels will be on display from May 26 to 28, with presentation sessions scheduled within this period.

General information:
a. The submission period for Oral Communication and Panel proposals will begin on September 5, 2025, and close on November 30, 2025. Deadlines will not be extended.
b. Proposals will be evaluated by the Scientific Committee.
c. Up to 80 presentations in TSs and 60 panels will be selected.
d. Results will be published on Instagram and on the event website by December 31, 2025.

2. ABOUT THE THEMATIC SYMPOSIUMS (TSs)

a. Eligible applicants for Oral Communication proposals in TSs include:
1. PhDs from Brazil and abroad;
2. PhD students from Brazil and abroad;
3. Professors from higher education institutions in Brazil and abroad;
4. Master’s students, in co-authorship with PhDs or professors from higher education institutions.

Important: Each Oral Communication proposal may have up to three authors.

b. Applicants may submit a proposal to only one TS.

c. Oral Communication proposals must:
i. Relate to one of the themes described in this Call;
ii. Follow the formatting guidelines in this document;
iii. Be submitted through the form available on the event website, under the ENGLISH menu.

d. Abstracts must include:
• Title (in uppercase) and subtitle (if any, in lowercase);
• Name(s) of the proposer(s), academic background, and institutional affiliation (if applicable);
• Contact email;
• Abstract text (150–300 words), including at least the objective of the work and discussion topics;
• 3–5 keywords (capitalized and separated by periods).

e. The list of accepted papers will be published on the website and Instagram page by December 20, 2025.

f. Each accepted paper will be allotted 15 minutes for presentation, followed by discussion.

g. All accepted abstracts will be included in the event’s Abstract Book.

h. Abstracts will be accepted in Portuguese, French, Spanish, and English.

i. The Colloquium will feature three Thematic Symposiums, organized around the following thematic axes:
Axis 1: Subjection and Insurrection
Race; Gender; Body; Heterotopias; Erotica; Neoliberalism; Governmentality; Madness; The psi field; Criminality.
Axis 2: Toolbox, Foucauldian Field of Action, and Readings
Interlocutors and/or authors read by Foucault (e.g., Marx, Kant, Nietzsche, Deleuze); Foucauldian readings and areas of research (e.g., Arts, Education, Teaching, History, Law, Literature, Languages).
Axis 3: Stories and Events
Foucault’s historical analyses and tools: Archaeology; Genealogy; Epistemes; Experiences; Antiquity; Christianity; Modernity.

j. Proposals that do not comply with the rules and guidelines of the TSs will not be evaluated.

3. ABOUT THE PANELS
a. The panel format is intended for individuals with undergraduate or graduate student status.

b. Each panel may have a maximum of three authors and must fit into one of the three thematic axes:
Theme 1: Subjection and Insurrection
Race; Gender; Body; Heterotopias; Erotica; Neoliberalism; Governmentality; Madness; The psi field; Criminality.
Theme 2: Toolbox, Foucauldian Field of Action, and Readings
Interlocutors and/or authors read by Foucault (e.g., Marx, Kant, Nietzsche, Deleuze); Foucauldian readings and areas of research (e.g., Arts, Education, Teaching, History, Law, Literature, Languages).
Theme 3: Stories and Events
Foucault’s historical analyses and tools: Archaeology; Genealogy; Epistemes; Experiences; Antiquity; Christianity; Modernity.

c. Each panel must include a supervising professor from a higher education institution with a minimum qualification of PhD.

d. Each author may submit only one panel proposal.

e. Before submitting a proposal, panel authors must register on the event website, under the ENGLISH menu. Important: In the case of works with multiple authors, all authors must register, but only one should submit the proposal.

f. The submission period for panel proposals is from September 5, 2025, to November 10, 2025.

g. Abstracts must include:
• Title (in uppercase);
• Names of the proponents;
• Abstract text (150–300 words), including at least the objective of the work and discussion topics;
• 3–5 keywords (capitalized and separated by periods).

h. Authors and advisors are responsible for preparing the panels for display during the event.

i. For questions, please contact: foucaultnabahia@gmail.com

Richard Niesche and Denise Mifsud, Thinking with Michel Foucault in Educational Leadership. Methodological and Conceptual Challenges, Bloomsbury, 2025.

This book brings together key scholars using Foucault in educational leadership to provide an overview of his methodologies, concepts, and examples of applications. Written for both those new to and experienced with Foucault’s work, this book explores new avenues to understand, critique and explore relevant issues in educational leadership. The book features chapters from academics and practitioners based in Australia, Denmark, Italy, the UK and the USA, and includes chapters on global education leadership, decolonial leadership, gender, and digital education governance.

Gibbs, E., Mackenzie, E., McKinlay, A., McNulty, D., Philips, J., Procter, S.
Governing the factory: microhistories of the present
(2024) Management and Organizational History

DOI: 10.1080/17449359.2024.2409127

Abstract
Microhistory is an established form of cultural history but marginal to management and organization history. Methodologically, microhistory searches out moments and practices that are meaningful to participants but deeply strange to us. Such peculiar moments are subjected to intense scrutiny to understand how they were meaningful to participants. Understanding the extraordinary becomes the portal to the cultural commonplace. Michel Foucault’s genealogies of modern disciplinary power deployed microhistorical methods to render their meaning and their strangeness visible. Microhistory’s innovative method often remains implicit in narratives. This paper demonstrates the analytical value of microhistory to management and history by considering two events separated by four decades in an aerospace factory.

In the first event, the factory halted production to celebrate New Year’s Eve in 1953. In this world turned upside down the factory was under the temporary authority of the workers. The second event, some forty years later, involved the dismissal of a shop steward for flouting managerial authority and his refusal to identify as an enterprising individual responsible for his work cell’s competitiveness. Management history and organization theory can be enriched by deploying microhistory’s techniques of intense interrogation of moments that confound our assumptions. Microhistory’s ascending analysis dislodges any temptation to read organizational practices and cultures from the boardroom down. © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.

Author Keywords
Foucault; governmentality; microhistory; Rolls-Royce

Reid-Pharr, R.F. Monster in the Archive (2024) James Baldwin Review, 10 (1), pp. 21-35.

DOI: 10.7227/JBR.10.2

Abstract
“Monster in the Archive” asks what the presence of a figure with a massive archival presence like James Baldwin does to our understanding of the presumed “absence” or “lack” of Black subjects in American archives. Paying careful attention to Michel Foucault’s observations about archives in “Lives of Infamous Men” as well as Baldwin’s correspondence with his friend, Mary Painter, this article argues that Baldwin’s “exceptionality” forces scholars and archivists to treat his archival presence as monstrous. Moreover, it argues that we need to develop new methods to approach Black archives. Again, following Foucault, the article proposes that we imagine approaching archives through the lens of friendship suggested by Foucault shortly before his death. © The Authors. Published by Manchester University Press and.

Author Keywords
archives; critical fabulation; James Baldwin; Mary Painter; Michel Foucault

Sheehey, B.
Between a scalpel and a touch, or, Foucault’s ways of writing the dead
(2023) Diacritics, 51 (3), pp. 8-29.

DOI: 10.1353/dia.2023.a938173

Abstract

This essay draws on Michel Foucault’s reflections on his writing practice to develop a reading of his historical inquiries as exercises of what I call “death-writing.” Death-writing is a type of writing that is predicated on death, both the death of the past and the death of others, comprising a way of orienting oneself toward the dead. I argue that Foucault mobilizes the theme of death and writing already since his earlier work in the 1970s. As a practice of death-writing, genealogy aims to diagnose the death of others by tracing their conditions of possibility in death’s entwinement with power. Finally, I suggest that Foucault began experimenting with another practice of death-writing in his Parallel Lives series, a writing that assumes a different affective bearing toward obscure and brief lives

Mills, J., & Thue Bjørndal, C. (2025). Endurance running coaching’s mechanical topography: a Foucauldian discourse analysis of coaches’ knowledges. Sports Coaching Review, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21640629.2025.2541142

ABSTRACT
Michel Foucault was part of a French revolution of history seeking deeper understandings of history beyond narratives of “great men” and their events. As a historian of the body and power, Foucault’s work is applicable to move endurance running coaches beyond the narratives of great coaches and their knowledges and practices. Discourse and knowledge are well-used concepts in Foucauldian coach scholarship, but specific Foucauldian discourse analyses are rare. Given endurance coaches aim to produce fast runners, adopting Foucault’s work could be both intriguing and compelling. Following, as faithfully as possible, Foucault’s discursive method, we analysed six of the most popular endurance running coaching textbooks to show how the endurance body can only be articulated as a machine, which may undermine coaches and their athletes’ development and performances.

KEYWORDS:
Foucault discourse knowledge body coaching

Jul 1, 2024 Theoretical Puppets: N is for Nietzsche (Michel Foucault)

Matthieu Queloz, The Practical Origins of Ideas: Genealogy as Conceptual Reverse-Engineering, Oxford University Press, 2021

Open access

Abstract
Why did such highly abstract ideas as truth, knowledge, or justice become so important to us? What was the point of coming to think in these terms? In The Practical Origins of Ideas, Matthieu Queloz presents a philosophical method designed to answer such questions: the method of pragmatic genealogy. Pragmatic genealogies are partly fictional, partly historical narratives exploring what might have driven us to develop certain ideas in order to discover what these do for us. The book uncovers an under-appreciated tradition of pragmatic genealogy which cuts across the analytic–continental divide, running from the state-of-nature stories of David Hume and the early genealogies of Friedrich Nietzsche to recent work in analytic philosophy by Edward Craig, Bernard Williams, and Miranda Fricker. However, these genealogies combine fictionalizing and historicizing in ways that even philosophers sympathetic to the use of state-of-nature fictions or real history have found puzzling. To make sense of why both fictionalizing and historicizing are called for, the book offers a systematic account of pragmatic genealogies as dynamic models serving to reverse-engineer the points of ideas in relation not only to near-universal human needs, but also to socio-historically situated needs. This allows the method to offer us explanation without reduction and to help us understand what led our ideas to shed the traces of their practical origins. Far from being normatively inert, moreover, pragmatic genealogy can affect the space of reasons, guiding attempts to improve our conceptual repertoire by helping us determine whether and when our ideas are worth having.

Keywords: concepts, genealogy, pragmatism, state of nature, history, David Hume, Friedrich Nietzsche, Edward Craig, Bernard Williams, Miranda Fricker

PhD course:
Foucault and Organization, Technology, and Subject-formation (4 ECTS)

Copenhagen Business School
Copenhagen, Denmark:
Monday 1 June 2026 to Thursday 4 June 2026

LINK to full program and registration:
https://phdsupport.nemtilmeld.dk/250/

Course coordinator: Kaspar Villadsen, Department of Business Humanities and Law (BHL)

Faculty
Professor Sverre Raffnsøe
Department of Business Humanities and Law, CBS

Associate Professor Marius Gudmand-Høyer
Department of Business Humanities and Law, CBS
Associate Professor Troels Krarup
Aalborg University

Professor (mso) Kaspar Villadsen
Department of Business Humanities and Law, CBS

Prerequisites
Only PhD students can participate in the course.
Participation requires submission of a short paper (see more below). Papers must be in English and deadline is 20th May 2026.

It is a precondition for receiving the course diploma that the PhD student attends the whole course.

Aim

The course will provide the participants with:
1) An introduction to key analytical potentials reconstructed from Foucault’s wide-ranging authorship as well as the lecturers’ own research projects.

2) In particular, we will discuss different approaches to themes of organization, technology, and subject-formation as they are deployed in state-of-the-art Foucault-inspired scholarship.

3) The potentials and limits of the particular way Foucauldian analytics can be applied in the participant’s research will be discussed. Hence, a range of analytical resources and potentials will be explored and discussed in relation to the participants’ current research.

Course content

Michel Foucault’s work continues to offer a major source of inspiration for PhD projects across a wide range of disciplinary domains. This PhD course explores how Foucault’s work speaks to three broad themes in contemporary business school research and beyond: Organization, technology, and subject-formation. The lecturers on the course have all pursued substantive research on these themes, drawing upon different parts of Foucault’s authorship, and they will base their teaching on this research experience. A key aim of the course is that the participants acquire an effective overview of analytical possibilities in Foucault’s work, effective for selecting and deploying such analytics in their own research.

Overall, Foucault’s thinking can help to inquire into the organizations, technologies and techniques of self-formation that make up the conditions of possibility for our contemporary experiences. First, Foucault’s usual genealogical approach (Foucault 1977, 1984) works by tracing how contemporary forms of organization emerged from past struggles, political strategies, and accidental events. From this perspective, the prevailing modes of organizing can be better grasped by recovering their historical conditions of emergence and dispersion. Genealogy takes as its basic premise that history, as well as our present, is a site of evolving struggle, including contest over divergent interpretations, which the development of modern modes of organizing and managing clearly displays. Hence, struggles around definitions and uses of appropriate management, leadership, accountability, transparency or sustainability make up pertinent material for genealogical inquiry.

Foucault developed his own notion of technology during the 1970s, namely the concept of “the dispositive”. A dispositive is defined as a historical configuration, which connects a series of discursive and non-discursive elements such as laws, practices, material artefacts, procedures, and techniques (Foucault, 1980). It designates a propensity in knowledge production and social practice as well as a “dispositionality” in how institutions emerge and transform. The concept opens for analyzing how our practices – for example, risk assessments or anti-pandemic strategies – are conditioned by dispositives that have been formed in historical processes often spanning several centuries. Foucault (2007) suggested that the dispositives of law, discipline and security have been particularly important as responses to thorny governmental problems such as crime, infectious diseases, population welfare, and labor unrest. Current problems such as climate change, environmental degradation and extreme inequality could be analyzed as straddling between these deep-rooted frameworks of calculation, intervention and rationalization. The dispositive has recently been introduced into Foucauldian scholarship as a highly promising analytical resource (##), and the course will explore how it can be used for empirical inquiries.

Finally, Foucault’s late authorship in the early 1980s, often termed his “ethical turn”, took him back to techniques of self-formation in Early Christianity and Greco-Roman antiquity. There, Foucault noticed a “technical” notion of ethics less defined by submission to universal moral codes and instead focused more on the self’s work upon the self.

Foucault’s attention to ethics in the early 1980s hardly signified a departure from political issues, but a re-conception of politics as an ethical politics. The work on your own freedom that ethics comprise is political, Foucault argued, in the sense that our self-fashioning involves what we are willing to accept or want to change in ourselves as well as in our circumstances: “[T]here is no first or final point of resistance to political power other than in the relationship one has to oneself” (Foucault, 2005: 252). Perhaps, the urgent issues of our time call for developing another form of ethics rather than models rooted in legal frameworks and Christian morality. The recent emergence of responsible consumers, ‘life-long learners’, climate conscious youths, “freeganism”, and fluid gender identity could be analyzed with inspiration from Foucault’s work on ethics and self-formation. An analytical key task that will be addressed in this part of the course is how to integrating Foucault’s notion of technology, the dispositive, with his analysis of self-technology, hence bridging the mid-career Foucault’s analytics of power with the late Foucault’s ethics.

The theme of this PhD course requires that the participants engage in some way with Foucault’s historical work, his analytical frameworks, his concepts, or his approach to organization, technology, and subjectivity. Papers that are not underpinned exclusively by Foucauldian analytics but also derive from other thinkers and traditions are welcome too. Our point of departure is that Foucauldian analytics is not only pertinent to philosophical research, since such analytics can also find application in ethnographic, sociological, organizational, historical, and anthropological research.

Teaching style

The goal is to sharpen the participants’ knowledge of the Foucauldian toolbox of analytical resources and how these can be applied in PhD projects. To that end we will set aside sufficient time to carefully examine and discuss the papers submitted by the participants. The course will consist of both workshops and lectures/presentations by scholars who are specialist in Foucault’s work and subsequent Foucauldian scholarship. The goal of the lectures is, first, to clarify the ways in which Foucault worked with his most significant analytics and, second, to demonstrate how to put the analytics at work in specific analysis. The aim of the workshops is to explore how Foucauldian analytics function (or possible may be employed) in each participant’s research – with the aim of strengthening, deepening and nuancing the participants’ dissertations or research articles. In the workshops, the course participants are divided into smaller groups (using shared topics and/or approaches as choice criteria) enabling a substantial peer discussion of both paper and their research project. Each workshop will be supervised and organized by one of lecturers.

All participants are required to submit a paper that deals with the key theme(s) of the PhD project in question. Papers that apply Foucauldian analytics to empirical problems in a variety of domains are welcomed, but so are papers that draw upon other thinkers and traditions. Perhaps the PhD student is interested in considering whether it would be interesting to include perspectives drawn from Foucault and Foucauldian scholarship in their PhD project.

It is possible to submit two kinds of papers. The first option is a short paper/abstract, which briefly presents the PhD student’s project and perhaps poses some questions regarding how it could include perspectives from Foucault. The second option is to submit a brief paper (5-10 pages), which presents the PhD project and some key theoretical and/or empirical considerations, and it can perhaps include notions from Foucault such as power, knowledge, governmentality, technologies of power, self-technology, etc. The key idea is that each participant will take home lots of beneficial inputs to his/her PhD project based on a discussion of challenges and potentials in the project.
Papers must be in English.

Learning objectives

• Achieve a strong reflexivity regarding how the choice of analytics from Foucault’s authorship brings certain questions, problems, entities and processes into the foreground of analysis and critical consideration.

• Awareness of different ways of working with Foucauldian analytics in PhD dissertations, articles and academic writing in general. This awareness will particular concern and be exemplified by the themes of organization, technology, and subjectivity. However, as mentioned above, these themes are not exclusive.

• The course will increase participant’s critical ability to account for the potential role of Foucauldian analytics, in general, and how it is applied in the participant’s research, specifically. This reflexivity concerns, inter alia, the epistemological distinctiveness of Foucauldian analytics, the social ontology its assumes, the analytical practices involved in Foucauldian scholarship, and the potential critical effects of such scholarship. Finally, the increased reflexivity relates to the range of Foucauldian analytical resources that can be effectively explored in relation to the participants’ current research.

LINK to full program and registration:
https://phdsupport.nemtilmeld.dk/250/