Foucault News

News and resources on French thinker Michel Foucault (1926-1984)

Maddalena Cerrato, Michel Foucault’s Practical Philosophy. A Critique of Subjectivation Processes, SUNY Series in Contemporary French Thought, De Gruyter Brill, 2025

Interview with author on New Books site, 2 September 2025

About this book
Offers a wholistic approach to Michel Foucault’s thought introducing the idea of practical philosophy as an original interpretative framework.

Michel Foucault’s thought, Maddalena Cerrato writes, may be understood as practical philosophy. In this perspective, political analysis, philosophy of history, epistemology, and ethics appear as necessarily cast together in a philosophical project that aims to rethink freedom and emancipation from domination of all kinds. The idea of practical philosophy accounts for Foucault’s specific approach to the object, as well as to the task of philosophy, and it identifies the perspective that led him to consider the question of subjectivity as the guiding thread of his work. Overall, Cerrato shows the deep consistency underlying Foucault’s reflection and the substantial coherence of his philosophical itinerary, setting aside all the conventional interpretations that pivot on the idea that his thought underwent a radical “turn” from the political engagement of the question of power toward an ethical retrieval of the question of subjectivity.

Maddalena Cerrato is Assistant Professor of Critical Theory in the Department of International Affairs at the Bush School of Government and Public Service, Texas A&M University.

Allsobrook, C. (2025). The Structural Violence of Imperial Trusteeship in Postcolonial Governmentality. African Studies, 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00020184.2025.2536036

ABSTRACT
The article considers how structural violence in African polities has displaced sovereign agency and responsibility for its harmful effects by extending imperial practices of trusteeship in postcolonial governmentality. It explains how, with liberation, decolonisation and political independence, imperial practices of indirect rule and informal empire – legitimised with reference to trusteeship – have resulted in practices of domination, which are instantiated in structural violence. Trusteeship formally displaces the direct agency of coercive imperial colonisation, first, by disguising it as protection and development assistance, and second, by setting up proxy domestic political agents to stand in for absent imperial sovereignty. I analyse these dynamics with reference to Foucault’s account of governmentality and his theories of power to explain African complicity with empire. I then review and critique Mbembe’s analysis of necropolitics in the postcolony to explain a weakness in his account, which leads him to misconstrue these conflicts in terms of sovereign power, thereby misrepresenting the agency of the consequent African victims of postcolonial structural violence, without pointing to any way out. To correct this misunderstanding, and to identify a basis for emancipatory agency in Africa, I turn to Biko’s critical analysis of Black governmentality under apartheid, which points forward to postcolonial empowerment.

KEYWORDS:
structural violence, postcolonial governmentality, necropolitics, biopower, disciplinary power, trusteeship

CALL FOR PAPERS
The twenty-fourth annual meeting of the
Foucault Circle
University of Notre Dame, South Bend, Indiana
April 3-5, 2026

We seek submissions for papers on any aspect of Foucault’s work, as well as studies, critiques, and applications of Foucauldian thinking. This conference also celebrates the centennial of Foucault’s birth, so we also welcome biographical retrospectives and papers that set an agenda for the next century of Foucauldian thought.

Paper submissions require an abstract of no more than 750 words. All submissions should be formatted as a “.doc” or “.docx” attachment, prepared for anonymous review, and sent via email to the attention of program committee chair Anna Ahlgren (anna.ahlgren@specped.su.se) on or before November 1, 2025. Indicate “Foucault Circle submission” in the subject heading. Program decisions will be announced in December.

We expect that the conference will begin Friday afternoon and will conclude around lunchtime on Sunday. Presenters will have approximately 40 minutes for paper presentation and discussion combined; papers should be a maximum of 3500 words (20-25 minutes reading time). Please note that conference presentations will be in person and in English.

Logistical information about lodging, transportation, and other arrangements will be available after the program has been announced.

For more information about the Foucault Circle, please see our website
http://www.foucaultcircle.org
or contact our Coordinator, Brad Elliott Stone
brad.stone@lmu.edu

Mu, Y., & Vásquez, C. (2025). “Waste-sorting is the new fashion”: waste, power, and the semiotic landscape. Social Semiotics, 1–22.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2025.2543085

ABSTRACT
This study examines how the Chinese government uses multiple semiotic resources, in both online and offline contexts, to (re)shape citizens’ behaviors and construct knowledge about wastesorting under the recent national waste-sorting policy. Informed by Foucault’s notion of governmentality, we show how governmental strategies operate at the level of both material artifacts (e.g. rubbish bins in one city) as well as in national media reports (i.e. news articles from state-sponsored news websites). By integrating geosemiotics with multimodal critical discourse analysis, we demonstrate how rubbish bins visually, interactively, and spatially construct wastesorting as “fashionable” public behavior. At the same time, online news media reports complement these artifacts by highlighting certain elements of the new bins (e.g. CCTV cameras and card-swiping systems) and by capturing strategic moments of residents using the bins, thus supporting and promoting actions that are aligned with national policy.

KEYWORDS:

Semiotic landscape, Foucauldian power, multimodality, waste

Le Blanc, G. (2025). Let Live or Let Die: Stranger to the Nation. Translated by Kaitlin Sager. In: Elhariry, Y., Keller-Privat, I., Tamalet Talbayev, E. (eds) Re-Membering Hospitality in the Mediterranean. Mediterranean Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-84043-2_9

Abstract
This chapter explores Michel Foucault’s analysis of biopolitics and its application to contemporary migration and refugee issues. Drawing on Foucault’s analogy between the madman and the foreigner, the study examines how modern migrants embody the status of “border-being,” as they are simultaneously included and excluded from society. The notion of hospitality is criticized as a mechanism that facilitates exclusion under the guise of care, with refugee camps serving as the instruments of segregation and invisibility. The text extends Foucault’s concepts, arguing that biopolitics today bifurcates toward the management of productive lives and the relegation of unproductive ones—especially migrants—to the margins. The chapter highlights the racialization of migrants, which moves from biological to cultural “neo-racism,” wherein cultural differences sustain exclusion. An interrogation of the role of humanitarian governance likens the process to managing “undesirables,” and identifies parallels between historical mechanisms of exclusion and contemporary migration management, such as surveillance and detention. The analysis critiques the re-legitimization of the nation-state through the biopolitical distinction between nationals and foreigners, underpinned by disciplinary technologies. Finally, the study reflects on the symbolic invisibility of migrant spaces, like camps and jungles, as heterotopias that spatialize exclusion and reinforce national identities. The conclusion calls for a reconsideration of the intersection of biopolitics, national borders, and social governance in the face of global migration challenges.

Frank Fischer, Critical Policy Inquiry. Interpreting Knowledge and Arguments. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2024

Presenting a critical approach to the study of public policy and policy analysis, this book offers a postpositivist foundation that challenges empiricist and technocratic approaches to policy studies. Critical Policy Inquiry draws on Jürgen Habermas’s work on communicative action and deliberation, Michel Foucault’s writings on discourse, and the epistemics of social constructivism.

Frank Fischer advances deliberative policy argumentation and the logic of practical reason, exploring how this can be used as a framework for interpreting the interaction of normative and empirical arguments in policy politics. He applies this approach to a diverse range of topics, including technocracy, policy expertise, deliberative democratic politics, interpretive policy analysis, post-truth, climate and Covid denialism, participatory governance, local and tacit knowledge, and the role of emotion in policy controversies. The book concludes with a look to transformative policy learning and the future of the field.

Connecting social and political theory with empirical research, this book is essential for students and scholars of public policy, politics, governance, public administration, and regulatory policy. Its practical, real-world applications will also be of value to policymakers worldwide.

If you’re in the market for a Foucault teeshirt cap or a mug, or indeed either of these items featuring other theorists, have a look at this page on the Zazzle site.

Zazzle is an American site which has a number of mirror sites around the world. I have linked to the Australian one. I first came across these in 2011. They are still going strong with new additions in 2025.

I first posted about these in 2011. They are still going strong.
Presents perhaps for the theorist who has everything?
For purchase from this site. Sales are still going strong in 2025. There are a range of other buttons covering other theorists and iconic figures as well.

Valentina Antoniol and Stefano Marino (Eds)
Foucault’s Aesthetics of Existence and Shusterman’s Somaesthetics. Ethics, Politics, and the Art of Living, Bloomsbury, 2024

Description
Bringing together Michel Foucault’s aesthetics of existence and Richard Shusterman’s somaesthetics, this volume provides a critical comparison of two of the most influential philosophical theories of the late 20th and early 21st centuries.

Introduced by a comprehensive overview of both concepts by editors Stefano Marino and Valentina Antoniol, the ensuing chapters interrogate the affinities and variances between Foucault’s and Shusterman’s philosophies. Building on the interdisciplinary character of somaesthetics and aesthetics of existence, international scholars explore these ideas through a wide range of topics ranging from care of the self and of the social self to the ethical and political challenges posed by themes as white ignorance, construction of resistances, and production of subjectivities. Given the central role played by the body in both concepts, this volume also affords particular attention to the philosophy of sexuality.

Demonstrating the value of reading these two thinkers together through the adoption of radical interpretive perspectives, Foucault’s Aesthetics of Existence and Shusterman’s Somaesthetics highlights the potentialities and the relevance of Foucault’s and Shusterman’s theories, even with respect to our actualité.

Xinling Li, The Manufacturing of ‘Correct Collective Memory’ in Chinese Media and the Resistance of Chinese Netizens, In Rawnsley, M.-Y.T., Ma, Y., & Rawnsley, G.D. (Eds.). (2025). Routledge Handbook of Chinese Media (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003362500

Abstract
This chapter examines the concept of ‘correct collective memory’, articulated by China’s foreign affairs spokeswoman Hua Chunying during a press conference confirming the coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan. It explores the construction of correct collective memory in Chinese media and the increasing challenges from rising civilian dissent enabled by new media. The Chinese government’s efforts to control negative perceptions of the zero-Covid policy through mass media propaganda ultimately failed, leading to a significant concession: the country’s reopening in response to the Blank White Paper movement. While mainstream analyses have attributed the movement’s temporary ‘success’ to the extreme inhumanity of China’s Covid restrictions, this chapter argues that new media platforms, particularly social media, have emerged as spaces for contesting memory, for example in the emergence of lockdown diaries. These platforms allow for a clash between citizen and official narratives of social events, preventing the government from easily imposing a unified correct collective memory through traditional methods like survivorship bias and collectivist storytelling.